Banner
    For Adlène Hicheur
    By Tommaso Dorigo | May 17th 2011 03:23 AM | 23 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Tommaso

    I am an experimental particle physicist working with the CMS experiment at CERN. In my spare time I play chess, abuse the piano, and aim my dobson...

    View Tommaso's Profile
    I was unaware of the following story, which was brought to my attention by Monica Pepe-Altarelli yesterday. Since I totally agree that nobody should be detained without proof of guilt for long periods of time, and since we are talking of a physicist, I am glad to broadcast the story here.

    A colleague from LHCb, Adlène Hicheur, of French-Algerian origin, was arrested on 8 October 2009 on suspicion of having contacts with a member of Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, through internet forums. After being detained for several days for questioning, Adlène was placed under formal investigation for suspected “conspiracy with a terrorist organization”. Since then, he has been kept in jail in Fresnes, near Paris, under “provisional detention”, although no proven material facts appear to have been produced against him to justify his detention in jail for more than 18 months.

    The only incriminating information was in the form of e-mail messages and other communications obtained at the time f Adlène's arrest; there has been nothing fresh since that time.

    It should be the concern of any of us who love freedom that nowadays in France, a country which has "liberté" among the three words at the root of its republican nature, a person can be arrested and kept in jail under “provisional detention” and without any trial for such a long time.

    Adlène's colleagues are worried for him and his health. Even in the case that he is publically demonstrated to be innocent of all charges, his scientific career is likely to be destroyed by the length and  arbitrariness of the procedure.  A support committee has been created by them in order to bring Adlene’s case to the attention of the scientific community and help him in any legal way possible. Since he was arrested, Adlène has consistently professed his innocence and has stated that the accusations against him are completely false.

    Most recently, the matter has also been discussed in Physics World, in a piece by Michael Dittmar.

    Comments

    The length of time he has been held without trial is concerning, but it seems right to me terror suspects are denied bail. There is also one very questionable passage in the Dittmar article:

    "He was arrested...apparently because he had
    participated in Internet discussion groups. We do
    not know the details of these discussions, but
    obviously this alone does not make him a terrorist."

    If the charge is "conspiracy with a terrorist organisation", then the content of those discussions could well be enough to determine his guilt.

    "Instead of the media writing articles about
    the right to freedom of speech, however,
    they preferred to focus on absurd accusations."

    Freedom of speech doesn't mean that you can say whatever you like. Rights go hand in hand with responsibilities, even though this often seems to be forgotten. Perhaps some headline writers went a bit over the top, but that doesn't change the fact that he was arrested on suspicion of terror-related activities, which is what the papers reported.

    "It is ridiculous to even think that Hicheur
    was an Al-Qaeda terrorist attempting
    to attack military installations in France."

    Why? Because Dittmar doesn't want it to be true? This is a vacuous statement.

    dorigo
    Rhys, I think you should beware of what it means "determine one's guilt" before a trial. In any case the issue is an old and much debated one -whether we should diminish our freedom in exchange for more safety. I think that the guy deserves a trial, and if a trials has not bene done, he should be given back his freedom.

    T.
    I agree that if they have enough evidence to try him, then he should be tried, and if not, he should be released. At first I didn't realise that he isn't even "awaiting trial", rather "awaiting the outcome of a secret investigation which may or may not lead to a trial". Holding somebody for up to two years in such a situation is indeed terrible.

    Sorry for him. But feminists and their fake allegations routinely violate human rights of men (Julian Assange, Jörg Kachelmann, possibly Strauss-Kahn...)

    dorigo
    Oh, July. Strauss Kahn a victim of feminists ? Give me a break!
    T.
    Hank
    I was a little skeptical of his feelings on Assange but when I got to Strauss-Kahn I started laughing.  Perhaps it is customary in France to chase after the hotel maids with your noodle, but Americans insist you at least buy her dinner first.    His creepy weirdness was not caused by feminism, it was caused by his never being arrested for being a creepy weirdo elsewhere when he was younger.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    What's happening to Hicheur is probably perfectly legal, though repulsive, probably under "strengthened" anti-terrorism laws. If that is the case, then the best thing to do is to use international pressure on the French authorities, especially by professional associations, scientific institutions, human rights organizations and prestigious personalities. At least, that seems to have worked in the case of political prisoners under dictatorial regimes. But it may take quite some time, and he may well end up expelled from the country (still much better than being in prison, of course).

    vongehr
    Brad Manning is psycho tortured on a 24h a day basis for providing us with data. As a scientists, I have a deep appreciation for transparency, for data as such, for without data, science or any rational endeavor is impossible. I do not see an uproar among scientists against the ongoing torture of him. Instead I have to now be concerned about a physicists that may or may not be involved in terrorism. Sure - unwarranted detention is bad, but I should care now about this particular and relatively mild case because he is a physicist? Sorry, but there are too many asshat physicists out there who do not give a shit about anything but their own career. Lets concentrate on people who have clearly deserved our support and not just go into a knee jerk reaction whenever it is "one of us".
    So your point is that if we don't get outraged and up-in-arms by some other similar (worse) injustice somewhere else, we should not be allowed to take action against this one?

    Sure, you have a point that other people out there need help too, but you are not making a convincing argument.

    The point here is that a number of people in high energy experiment are personally familiar with Adlene, and so have an informed personal opinion about the likelihood that he is a terrorist. This makes them uniquely qualified to take action in this case, unlike the other.

    Surely the suffering of Bradley Manning does not invalidate the suffering of others? And what is "relatively mild" about being in prison for 18 months? Have you tried it? In fact there are dozens of people in the UK in similar situations - some have been locked up for as long as 10 years - and Michael Dittmar tells me there are over 100 in France. We should campaign for all of these men - whether they are physicists or not - and we should go on campaigning until they all get justice.

    vongehr
    Exactly, precisely my point (except for that you might like to look into what they are actually doing to Brad Manning - he is not just in jail my friend - at least the last time I looked, British jails did not look like US military psycho torture dungeons!). So as we agree on the general point, you may also agree on that it is highly suspect if somebody does not really care about these matters until somebody of his own profession/background/skin-color/whatever is a victim. Getting Brad Manning out of torture? I am in. But establishing a class system where instead of the rich now scientists are treated differently under the law? No - count me out. All such can possibly result in is that the already bad situation (regarding the sociology of science) becomes yet more corrupted. Again: Somebody nice is treated unfairly? Show me that he is a nice guy and maybe I care about one more being fucked over. A physicist should get special treatment? Nope - too many asshat physicists out there. I'd rather give gardeners special considerations - none of them ever hype data, play the peer review system for their advantage, etc etc etc.
    dorigo
    Sascha, you are being excessive, overreacting, and unnecessarily rude. Nobody was suggesting anything like singling out physicists or such. The guy is in jail for no apparent good reason, and some colleagues of him (friends of him, that is -and I hope you understand that friends might have an additional reason to campaign in favor of him) asked me to broadcast the story.

    Sorry but your texts above are a total rant, plus are directed in the wrong direction.

    Cheers,
    T.
    Leave him alone, Tommaso. Some "asshat physicist" reviewer must have rejected a paper of his, and now he thinks that they should all languish in jail without trial...

    vongehr
    Well then write it like that, and not "It should be the concern of any of us who love freedom", as if you usually cared about more than rumors about blibs on little humps. "The guy is in jail for no apparent good reason" - oh yeah - welcome to reality Tommaso - the jails are stuffed with people in there for no good reason, which you would know about if you took some of my blog entries serious. But hey, why care about those druggies right, they are not like we good physicists obviously better people.
    dorigo
    Sascha, I was leaning toward assuming you had a bad day when you wrote the comments above, but I see that there is something that moves you, since you continue to misbehave and be flippant on this thread.

    What is it ? Did you have a relative imprisoned for a long period of time unjustly ? I did, although I did not blog about it.

    I am afraid I did not read the blog entries you mention. This is inexcusable on my part, but I won't feign I understand what you mean.

    Cheers,
    T.
    After this length of time, this is becoming a serious issue, and it is important that a tenured CNRS researcher or two that is interested in legal issues from an academic standpoint start spending some time learning seriously about the legal issues (hopefully with an interested pro bono lawyer), and then begin filing motions for habeas corpus, because his incarceration without trial has gone on entirely too long.

    Thank you Tommaso for broadcasting this story via your blog.
    What's happening to Adlen Hicheur is unacceptable and all his colleagues and people who know him are surprised and alarmed by the inhumane treatment he is facing.
    The french failed to give anything showing his guilt. He is detained "provisionally" or "just in case" since months..
    The situation is ridiculous... his only guilt is that he's half Algerian.

    and ***, if he really wanted to do something, he wouldn't use a public forum or whatever they are claiming... he's not that stupid ! what was meant to be a political move (the timing of his arrest was fine-tuned with political considerations) is becoming more and more dangerous for his health and life.

    As you say, It should be the concern of any of us who love freedom and justice. The scientific community first. The least we can do is to spread the awareness about his situation.

    Thanks again for showing such high ethics and commitments Tommaso. Much appreciated.

    ps.
    It is ironic that the French "elite" are appalled by how DSK is treated here in the US where he's facing obvious criminal charges (although innocent until proven guilty) and at the same time do not utter a word when it comes to their malfunctioning justice. Le monde a l'envers.... !
    liberte, egalite, et fraternite ..... a la francaise, de pures slogans creux.

    From what I understand, this sort of policing, (i.e. to keep a very close eye on those who have the smallest contact with known terrorists and to throw them in jail on the least pretext), is how the various red groups were brought to ground some decades ago. Perhaps you could share some tales or history of the brigatto rosso from the Italian point of view.

    Do you have any reply to the below?

    A Franco-Algerian nuclear scientist goes on trial on Thursday for allegedly plotting terror attacks in France, where an Islamist's killing spree has already overshadowed the presidential campaign.

    A week after police shot dead Franco-Algerian Mohamed Merah for killing seven people in and around Toulouse, Adlene Hicheur goes on trial charged with criminal association as part of a terrorist enterprise.

    French police arrested Hicheur, a researcher studying the universe's birth - the Big Bang - at the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN), in October 2009 after intercepting emails he wrote.

    Following his arrest at his parents' home near CERN, which lies on the Franco-Swiss border northwest of Geneva, police discovered a trove of al-Qaeda and Islamic militant literature.

    France's DCRI domestic intelligence agency's suspicions were raised following a statement from al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) that was sent to President Nicolas Sarkozy's Elysee Palace in early 2008.

    Police carried out surveillance on several email accounts including Hicheur's and his exchanges with Mustapha Debchi, an alleged AQIM representative living in Algeria.

    On March 1, 2009, Hicheur wrote an email to Debchi saying he would 'propose ... possible objectives in Europe and particularly in France'.

    On March 10, he continued: 'Concerning the matter of objectives, they differ depending on the different results sought after the hits. For example: if it's about punishing the state because of its military activities in Muslim countries - Afghanistan - then it should be a purely military objective. For example: the air base at Karan Jefrier near Annecy in France. This base trains troops and sends them to Afghanistan.'

    Hicheur was referring to a French military base at Cran-Gevrier, close to CERN.

    In June 2009, Debchi asked Hicheur: 'Don't beat around the bush: are you prepared to work in a unit becoming active in France?'

    Hicheur replied on June 6: 'Concerning your proposal, the answer is of course YES but there are a few observations: ... if your proposal relates to a precise strategy - such as working in the heart of the main enemy's house and emptying its blood of strength - then I should revise the plan that I've prepared.'

    Magistrates investigating the case said the exchanges 'crossed the line of simple debate of political or religious ideas to enter the sphere of terrorist violence'.

    He had a trial, and he had a chance to speak for himself.
    He, in fact , hadconfessed about having ties with terrorist group, blaming it to bad mental shape at the time.
    I beleive that most criminals having bad mental state when they are commiting their crimes; it does not mean they should not pay for them...

    I beleive everyone has a right to fair public trial and ofor an pportunity to defent one self, or to hire a defender. I am agaianst atrocities commited by Penthagon at Guantanamo for this exact reason: becasue I beleive every person, no matter how grave is a crime he is suspected of, has a right to be treated as innocent untill proven guilty by the court of law. Eventually the four hundred or something individuals held at Guantanamo are nothing but hostages.

    But if one is taken to the court, and court finds him or her guilty after all required procedures - it fine with me.. Courts asquited many terror suspects in the recent years, so if this one was sentenced - it only means he might be guilty.
    He can appeal of course.

    today the result of the trial (first grade) came out.
    court has sentenced him to five years in prison.
    I think many of your reader would like to hear your opinion

    D

    dorigo
    What opinion, on a sentence ? The matter here was the detention without trial.
    I am happy if he is in prison now that there is a reason for him to be there.
    Cheers,
    T.
    we (western country) should ask ourself if the preventive imprisonment (because this is what we are talking about here) is real and good method agaist crime, if it helps the inquiry and if it is right for the convict.
    You, as Italian, know that this method helped changing the political situation in italiy in 90s.
    And, apparently, awating trial in italy is still very (ab)used
    D