Banner
    Berlusconi for The Times: a Chauvinist Buffoon
    By Tommaso Dorigo | June 1st 2009 10:20 AM | 16 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Tommaso

    I am an experimental particle physicist working with the CMS experiment at CERN. In my spare time I play chess, abuse the piano, and aim my dobson...

    View Tommaso's Profile
    As elections to renew the european parliaments get closer, the political arena in Italy fails to deal with the matters that should interest voters, and instead concentrates on the behavior of Italy's prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi.

    In a crescendo of events, each of which could have brought less gutsy politicians to resign, the italian press is getting totally dominated by the personal matters of the prime minister. Let me give a brief summary below.

    A trial proved that Berlusconi had corrupted an English lawyer, Mills, to get a false testimony from him; a law masterfully crafted by Berlusconi's lacqueys only a year ago is now preventing his impeachment. Berlusconi's wife Veronica Lario publically announces she is asking for a divorce, and claims Berlusconi is a "sick man" and should seek help. This happens a few days after the italian premier visits the 18-year-old birthday party of Noemi Letizia, bringing costly presents to the girl. Then, a story of underage girls invited for a week of parties in Berlusconi's villa in Sardinia (Noemi among them) unfolds, with details on how the attendees allegedly traveled there with state-owned aircraft, on how Berlusconi's version of his acquaintance of one of them does not hold water, on pictures of girls in topless at this week-long party being offered to newspapers by a paparazzi and then confiscated by request of Berlusconi's lawyer Ghedini.

    Berlusconi is unmoved. He claims it is all a conspiration of the communists, and shows that the country is with him, quoting polls that see him at a whooping 73% popularity. But here is what The Times -only the last in a sizable list of newspapers dealing with the matter outside Italy- writes today:

    The Clown's Mask Slip

    The most distasteful aspect of Silvio Berlusconi’s behaviour is not that he is a chauvinist buffoon. Nor is it that he cavorts with women more than 50 years younger than himself, abusing his position to offer them jobs as models, personal assistants or even, absurdly, candidates for the European Parliament. What is most shocking is the utter contempt with which he treats the Italian public.

    The ageing Lothario may find it amusing, or even perhaps daring, to act the playboy, boasting of his conquests, humiliating his wife and making comments that to many women are grotesquely inappropriate. He is not the first or the only one whose undignified behaviour is inappropriate to his office. But when legitimate questions are asked about relationships that touch on the scandalous and newspapers challenge him to explain associations that, at best, are puzzling, the clown’s mask slips. He threatens those newspapers and televisions stations that he controls, invokes the law to protect his “privacy”, issues evasive and contradictory statements and then melodramatically promises to resign if he is caught lying.

    Read the rest of this artiche here.

    Comments

    Quoting from the article:

    "Many may also say that Italy is not America: that the puritan ethic framing standards in the US has never dominated Italian public life, and that few Italians are shocked by womanising. This is patronising nonsense. Italians understand just as well as Americans what is and what is not acceptable. And like Americans, they regard a cover-up as contemptible."

    I would really like to have reasons to share such a good opinion of Italians...

    dorigo
    Agreed. Italians do not understand nearly as well as Americans what is not acceptable as far as womanizing behaviors are concerned.

    That said, if I had to choose between the puritanism of Americans and the libertinism of Italians, I have no doubt where I'd land. But that is a different issue.

    Cheers,
    T.
    rholley
    between the puritanism of Americans and the libertinism of Italians
    Better to avoid both of them.  As Qohelet (It. Ecclesiaste) wrote getting on for 3000 years ago:

    • Be not overly righteous, and do not make yourself too wise. Why should you destroy yourself?

    • Be not overly wicked, neither be a fool. Why should you die before your time?

    • It is good that you should take hold of this, and from that withhold not your hand, for the one who fears God shall come out from both of them.
    (Ecc 7:16-18)
    Robert H. Olley Quondam Physics Department University of Reading England
    dorigo
    Very elegant, and yet so useless. Those who fear god fear themselves, because it is them who created her.
    Cheers,
    T.
    I've been reading about the Roman Emperors lately (Suetonius' "The Twelve Cesars"), and Berlusconi seems to act like one sometimes (especially one of the deranged ones).

    dorigo
    Oh yes, he's number 14.
    Cheers,
    T.
    Very funny line, Tommaso. I can imagine Woody Allen delivering that one. By the way, who is number 13?

    dorigo
    Mussolini, who else ?
    Cheers,
    T.
    El Pais has photographed the party of Berlusconi for our ex-PM Topolanek. It's a pretty repelling intervention to their privacy. See the 5 photos here:

    http://www.elpais.com/fotogaleria/imagenes/censuradas/Berlusconi/6527-3/...

    I am afraid that the naked guy - according to El Pais, it's Topolanek, has been more heavily affected than Berlusconi who is very correct to protect the privacy in the courts.

    dorigo
    Hi Lubos, what is repelling ? That a prime minister does not have a private life ? Come on. If a prime minister holds week-long parties with dozens of underage girls, flown there with flights paid by taxpayers, he deserves to be crucified. What is repelling is that this is not what happens in Italy.

    Cheers,
    T.
    Hank
    America had its own leader with some personal transgressions.  Some argued intangibles, like his recklessness and security issues, others argued moral ... but what got him in impeachment trouble was the legal issue of lying about it.   So Berlusconi may be a wiser politician.
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    dorigo
    Hell, no Hank, he lives in another league. He can lie and fear nothing. In fact he did: he repeatedly told the press that he had seen the underage Noemi Letizia only three or four times, always in the company of her parents -and that is a lie, he saw her several times alone. He said he had met her because he befriended her father, and that is a lie (he called her on the phone directly, after seeing a photographic book).

    So you see, he does live in a different league.

    Cheers,
    T.
    Dear Tommaso, I don't know where you got the "underage girls". At any rate, I recommend you not to make your comments available in Czech because here you could be sued for a libel and be ordered to pay a substantial amount that could effectively terminate your financial life.

    Berlusconi has paid for the food and housing, while Topolanek paid the rest (transportation etc.), see

    http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http://domaci.ihned.cz/c3-25186090-002A00_d-topolanek-dovolenou-v-italii-si-uhradim-sam&hl=en&langpair=auto|en&tbb=1&ie=windows-1250

    At any rate, it's very symptomatic how the far-left people always behave as Stalinist big brothers. Arbitrarily lousy justification is good for you to humiliate an individual and invade his or her private life. Who has the human rights if prime ministers don't? You surely don't believe that other people can have human rights if it is impossible to enforce them even for the leaders of countries.

    I've heard similar disgusting attacks against human dignity when I was surrounded by the feminist trash in the Academia. They were also saying that the president of Harvard, or myself, for that matter, didn't have the freedom of speech and other rights because we were in public places. What the fuck!? These freedoms are even more important for the people who are actually doing something than for some nobodies in inner cities - because it's the former and their freedom that our civilization is really based upon.

    People like you are just far too dangerous, and if there is going to be another war of freedom against tyranny and bolshevik methods, we must be much more strict against your side than we have been in the past.

    dorigo
    Hah, Lubos, you make me chuckle. You have it upside down, and reason as if leaders of a country are kings, and not people elected to serve their citizens. They are elected to lead a country, and they are expected to give an example. It is part of the rules of the game in any truly democratic country that they have *fewer* rights. For instance, in the US anybody can say what they like of people in the administration, without fear of libel charges. This is democracy, baby, and you sure do not belong to it. It is you, dear Lubos, who should experiment some repressive government in order to come to like what you are lucky to have now.

    Cheers,
    T.
    You have it upside down - because you clearly misunderstand what it means to "lead" or "give an example". If Berlusconi is "leading Dorigo or giving an example to Dorigo, it means that Dorigo should behave as Berlusconi does or suggests, not the other way around. So please fuck off.

    I don't accept that politicians or anyone else have "fewer rights". They have as many rights as any other citizen. This is guaranteed by the constitutions of all civilized countries.

    In the U.S., everyone can say anything about anyone.