I received yesterday a copy of the brand-new book by Ilya Narsky and Frank Porter, "Statistical Analysis Techniques in Particle Physics" (Wiley-vch 2014), and I would like to offer here my impressions and thoughts on the material.
The book comes in soft cover (I am unaware if a hardcover will also be available any time soon), and is printed on nice and good-smelling acid-free paper. This might look like a detail to you, but a good part of my judgement about a book comes from the way it smells ;-). The book costs $89 at WILEY, and you can get a good preview of the material and sample chapters at this site.
The cover shows a CMS heavy-ion event display overlaid to a few typical graphs of multivariate techniques. I should mention that the subtitle reads "Fits, Density Estimation and Supervised Learning". Indeed, the book is geared toward multivariate techniques in data analysis, and cannot be mistaken for a general-purpose book on statistical techniques; despite that, the authors have made an effort to insert in the first two chapters (ch.2 and ch.3, as the first is an introduction) some reminder of the most important techniques. Of course one cannot imagine that this is more than a quick reminder aimed at readers who already know the topics dealt with there: goodness-of-fit tests, which are the main subject of chapter 3, are done with in 15 pages; confidence intervals, in chapter 2, occupy even a few less.
The main part of the book is a discussion of the many multivariate techniques that exist for advanced data analysis, with a few examples taken from particle physics and astrophysics. Rather than trying to be a deep treatise (there exist others on the market), the book deals with every topic at a level suitable to anybody who is only generically familiar with statistical tools and who wants to learn the basics of methods which most of us have not even ever heard about. For good or for bad, these methods have become extremely important in basic science once computing power has surpassed the required level to easily handle them.
Every chapter is complemented with a few exercises and a selected list of references. I am not a big fan of books that give you work assignments without offering a solution at the back, or at least some trace of the solution; I hope authors will make an effort to provide worked out solutions to at least a sample of the exercises in their site. That would be a great addition to the material they offer.
All in all, I believe this is a very useful book for researchers who wish to learn more about the techniques that have become available in the course of the last 20 years to achieve more powerful inference from their data. Not knowing what are kernel estimation, bootstrap, or random forests has become increasingly embarassing if you work in the field.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Graphene Sensor Tracks Down Cancer Biomarkers
- Why Natural Gas, Including Fracking, Is Better For The Environment Than Wind And Solar
- Phase-Change Materials Set New Speed Limit For Silicon
- M60-UCD1: Tiny Galaxy, Supermassive Black Hole
- More Children Making Music, But Are Lessons Too Conventional?
- Life After The 125 GeV Higgs: What Is Left Of Two-Higgs Doublet Models
- Watching Neurons Learn: Learning New Ideas Is More Difficult
- "I suppose when all you can see is political bias, it stands to reason that you would interpret..."
- " Actually that's a pretty good misrepresentation of the studies. Thanks for contributing more nonsense..."
- "Yeah. Who would feel angry in an airport?..."
- "Why do you call Dawkins a militant atheist? Has he ever killed anyone or advocated as such? By..."
- "Why do you seem to associate non-belief with being self-centered? That is not the case. ..."