Fake Banner
    Satellite Radio Requirements, FCC, IARU
    By Project Calliope | April 5th 2011 02:00 AM | 4 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Project

    'Project Calliope' is a pico-satellite funded by Science 2.0 and being launched in 2011 by a mad scientist who is a space & music enthusiast...

    View Project's Profile
    Upon launch, there will be 32 picosatellites, all desperately trying to beam their messages to Earth. FCC frequency coordination and requirements are the next hurdle to solve for Project Calliope.

    Calliope is an amateur mission so we play by amateur radio rules. Calliope is armed with a half-watt Radiometrix transmitter. I already have an FCC-issued amateur HAM radio technican-class license, but that is just the first step.

    The FCC rules the spectrum, but the International Amateur Radio Union (IARU) are the entity that actually coordinates satellites. I need to file/coordinate with the IARU to use the amateur-band with my personal ham callsign as the satellite's callsign. Like any regulation, there are many details.

    The main IARU requirement is 'play nice, and be able to turn off your transmitter at a moment's notice'. My approach will be to have the required 'stop transmit' command, of course. To make this really work, however, I will also have all transmissions time out and shut down automatically after an appropriate interval (10 minutes?). Transmission only starts when a 'start transmitting' command is uplinked, with possibly a few orbits that are pre-arranged to have the satellite automatically turn on based on a clock (if IARU allocates the time).

    Since most hams use transceivers (can receive and transmit, for non-hams reading this), it is more fair to only broadcast when someone is willing and able to receive and yet shouldn't reduce the ability to get Calliope data down. I need to do some minor orbit calculations to figure out the optimum window (est: 10 minutes), then apply to IARU to ask to share the frequency.

    From a ground station listener point of view, when you wish to listen, you transmit the 'start transmitting' command to Calliope, then it broadcasts for the set time (while you're in range) then shuts down. By definition, you can also shut it down earlier (since you're the one that sent the 'on' and are still in range), so it provides assurance that Calliope won't hog spectrum.

    This complies with the IARU requirements without requiring me being able to guarantee 24/7 uplink to the satellite. Note that I have not yet contacted IARU, however, so this remains theoretical. I may be missing an FCC requirement somewhere. There could be roadblocks. IARU may say 'no'. I have no idea how 32 satellites will share spectrum.

    It is possible IOS may assist with radio, but this is an area that I have not yet investigated. Ultimately, IOS could offer radio as a service, but it isn't IOS's job, as launcher, to negotiate frequencies. This was one reason I got my ham license. Somethings you just gotta do yourself. It helps with the IARU bit to have a solid launch window, so that's one reason (among many) I haven't pushed faster on this. When I do, I'll be sure to write about the process so others can follow!

    I would enjoy my own ground station, beyond my little hand-held test radio.  Dream hardware I would love to get is something akin to a satellite-ready rig able to let you adjust for doppler shift. And a nice antenna-- antennas are crucial. Talking with Jeff C. over on the original $8K thread brought out my wish for nice hardware, beyond just a Blance DeBois stance of relying on the kindess of other hams.

    this is what $1500 of Yaesu FT-847 radio looks like

    Having a good antenna and a Yaesu FT-847 or Kenwood TS-2000X would run perhaps $2000 for radio gear.  At the time I write this, I am only halfway through the excellent "ARRL Satellite Handbook", so I admit be being a little weak on what gear is out there.  I will need to be able to handle packet data, directly interfacing with a computer, and I'm happy to take gear recommendations.  Fortunately, I enjoy shopping.  The price tag, though, after what I've sunk into Calliope already, that's a puzzler.  I may have to fundraise to set up a 'Ground Station Calliope', while continuing my hope of working with other hams for better coverage.

    I have a friend who considers Calliope a justifiable reason to upgrade his own gear, so I'm happy to be an excuse. Note to any hams-- internal conscience or significant other complaining that you spend too much on gear? Tell 'em it's for SCIENCE! Let me be your excuse!

    Alex

    DIY satellite news every Tuesday here and at Project Calliope
    General space science every Friday at the Daytime Astronomer

    Comments

    Aitch
    Hi Alex Isn't satellite transmission data set up like networking router signals for multiple client PCs, with anti-collision rules for packets sent/received? It would seem to make sense...? Its been a good few years since I flew model planes, and only had sequential controllers, but digital only seems to have been separated into xtal frequencies, and I've seen flyers with crossover calls because 2 planes had the same frequency.....though I believe now they use colour coding? Aitch
    calliope
    It's all shared spectrum with low power transmitters, the closest to networking is that it's hard to acquire any given satellite-- it's moving and most antennas need a directional fix on it to get the signal, and it passes by quickly.  The IARU tries to ensure everyone gets a chance to be heard, without one mission dominating the airwaves over the rest.
    That said, a satellite guy named Wes working on Tubesats just pointed us to an interesting coordination for packet data from satellites, at http://beacon.engr.scu.edu/Submission.aspx, that I need to study further.

    Alex

    What kind of packets are you going to be transmitting? Normally I think of CCSDS packets with satellites, but that seems a bit much for Calliope.

    It might be worth it to ask the NASA Near Earth Network if they could capture your data downlinks on an "as available" basis. I don't know if they'd be willing to play, but it seems the sort of thing that could be done with zero effort as long as they didn't want to actually decommutate your data. Just grab it for you and forward it to you.

    Hi,

    I haven't had a chance to look through all your postings, so maybe the problem is solved. However, if not:

    Your comments about recruiting hams are a good approach. Many cubesat groups request help with capturing telemetry. An announcement to satellite operators will probably get you a lot of hams willing to copy the downlink and upload captured data files to a web site (especially if the web site lets them listen to what they've captured). Consider joining the amsat-bb mailing list for this (sign up at www.amsat.org). (And be sure to make it clear that you're transmitting only data; sending music over ham radio is illegal.)

    There are many inexpensive options for a ground station, depending on your requirements. You could put together a portable receive-only station for under $250. One neat option is the FunCube Dongle, a software defined receiver that plugs into a computer's USB port--just add software and an antenna. A command station will cost more because of the need for a strong transmitted signal, but even that could be done for under $1000 (something like an FT-817, amplifier, and homemade antenna on an inexpensive TV rotor). -- Dave

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.