A new slave-making ant species from the eastern USA quite literally means 'to pillage'. The listing in Zookeys tell us of the new ant Temnothorax pilagenspilere is plunder in Latin.

Temnothorax pilagens is different from other slave-making ants, like the famous slave-hunting Amazon Ants whose campaigns may include up to 3000 warriors, the new slave-maker is minimalistic in expense, but most effective in result. The length of a “Pillage Ant” is only two and a half millimeters and the range of action of these slave-hunters restricts to a few square meters of forest floor.

Targets of their raiding parties are societies of two related ant species living within hollow nuts or acorns. These homes are castles in the true sense of the word – characterized by thick walls and a single entrance hole of only 1 millimeter in diameter, they cannot be entered by any larger enemy ant.
An average raiding party of the Pillage Ant contains four slave-hunters only, including the scout who had discovered the target. Due to their small size, the raiders easily penetrate the slave species’ home. A complete success of raiding is achieved by a combination of two methods: chemical camouflage and artistic rapier fencing.

Pilagens lateral
Worker of Temnothorax pilagens, the newly described slave-making ant species. Credit: © Bernhard Seifert 

The observed behavior is surprising as invasion of alien ants in an ant nest often results in fierce, usually mortal, fighting. Here, however, in several observed raids of the Pillage Ant, the attacked ants did not defend and allowed the robbers to freely carry away broods and even adult ants to integrate them into the slave workforce. The attacked ants did not show aggression and defence because the recognition of the enemy was prevented by specific neutralizing chemical components on the cuticle of the slave-hunters.
The survival of slave ant nests is an ideal solution from the perspective of slave hunters as it provides the chance for further raids during the next years. In other observed raids chemical camouflage was less effective – perhaps because the attacked ant population was strongly imprinted to a more specific blend of surface chemicals. In fact, a defence reaction was more probable if theattacked colony contained a queen that causes a strong imprinting of chemical recognition cues.

Pilage ant and slave
A slave hunter (below) and a slave (upper) in head-to-head contact. Credit: ©Miriam Papenhagen.