Banner
    Copyright Infringement and International Law
    By Patrick Lockerby | January 18th 2012 09:57 AM | 7 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Patrick

    Retired engineer, 60+ years young. Computer builder and programmer. Linguist specialising in language acquisition and computational linguistics....

    View Patrick's Profile
    Copyright Infringement and International Law

    What with the day of action on SOPA taking up the front pages of the media, a new legal definition published by the UN has been mostly overlooked.

    I think it is very important that more people should realize how much a seemingly trivial change in a legal definition can affect their entire lives.  Accordingly, I am pleased to re-publish the information here - even at risk of the entire site being taken down for copyright infringement.

    [quote]
    United Nations Organization
    Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea

    Revised definition of offenses committed by lawless seafarers against persons and or property.

    Whereas the term 'piracy' has been formally co-opted by various legislators and jurisdictions to mean or imply or include the exchange of information without the paying of tithes to those fictitious persons known or defined as legal persons:

    Therefore, let it be known that henceforth, for all purposes of international law having regard to the activities of persons of the class known generally as brigands, buccaneers, barbarians and such-like, the following definition of such persons shall be used as of this day and henceforth in all acts and communications of the high contracting parties, to wit:

    Acts of file sharing defined:

    Acts of file sharing are herewith defined as all or any acts which threaten maritime security by endangering, in particular, the welfare of seafarers and the security of navigation and commerce. File sharing acts may result in the loss of life, physical harm or hostage-taking of seafarers, significant disruptions to commerce and navigation, financial losses to shipowners, increased insurance premiums and security costs, increased costs to consumers and producers, and damage to the marine environment.

    Acts of file sharing are also any acts which have widespread ramifications, including preventing humanitarian assistance and increasing the costs of future lawful commerce in the affected waters.

    This definition shall enter into legal force as of this publication such as to emphatically change the international law so as to state that the use of deadly force against file sharers shall be assumed to be legal and it shall be incumbent on the file sharer after the fact to prove that it was not.
    [endquote]

    I don't expect that anybody will see any problems with this trivial change in the long-established meanings of words.   Except, perhaps, we will need to have an international 'talk like a file sharer day'. Avast there, ye swabs! Shiver me timbers, melads: touch my DVD burner and ye shall walk the plank!

    Comments

    Can you cite a source for this alleged document? The international law definition of piracy (or the maritime variety) is contained in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, an international treaty signed by most of the world's nations. The Division for Ocean Affairs and law of the Sea doesn't have the authority to issue binding legal definitions. The document is therefore suspect.

    logicman
    ... The document is therefore suspect.

    Darn! Sussed!  And I thought I was being so subtle! ;-)
    rholley
    Two thoughts on this, Patrick,

    (1) Memo to self: Re-read Treasure Island; teach parrot to say “Pieces of eight, pieces of eight!

    (2) We still use the word prince to apply to men such as him who got married on April 29th last year.  However, as G.K.Chesterton noted on his visit to America (around 1930) our British monarchs are de facto presidents, while the President of the USA is much more like a king.  Taking this further, if we apply the term to the leaders (Latin principes) of commerce, then the following, by Martin Luther, is most apt.  Anyway, this is what SOPA and such-like make me think:

    For there are very few princes who are not reckoned fools or knaves.  That is because they show themselves to be such; the common man is learning to think, and the prince’s scourge, which God calls contemptum, is gathering force among the mob and with the common man.

    Secular Authority: to what Extent it should be Obeyed, 1523

    Robert H. Olley Quondam Physics Department University of Reading England
    logicman
    ... the common man is learning to think ...

    And about time, too!  ;-)
    I particularly like the 'shoot first, ask questions later' part.

    'talk like a file sharer day' 1 83 1337

    logicman
    'talk like a file sharer day' 1 83 1337
    ROFL!

    1 83 1337 2


    This is really a big change. The author is very brave to post this article. The site might be taken down. And he knows it. But what really matters most is that he was able to express whats in his head. And he really had a lot to say. We cannot do anything about SOPA, its an international law. The law is the law and anyone should abide it. If no one will follow the rules, then its not a law.

    online casino