While lauded by activists as leadership, the Air Resources Board in California and its mandate of a controversial cap-and-trade scheme was always scientifically and economically suspect (see California grossly overstates emissions to get mandates passed) and it has turned out to be ethically questionable also.
San Francisco superior court judge Ernest H. Goldsmith has placed the program on hold, stating that the Air Resources Board did not consider public comments on the measures before adopting them. Voters turned down the option to delay the implementation of the plan last November, part of a 2006 law which requires the state to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
But even environmental groups knew cap-and-trade was flawed and this latest lawsuit was filed by six of them, because they contended it would allow refineries and power plants in poor neighborhoods to avoid cutting emissions of both greenhouse gases and traditional air pollutants.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- "I agree yoga should not be promoted as a treatment for BD, but everyone can gain benefits from..."
- "I had the opportunity to sit on the 3rd baseline at Wrigley, nice field!..."
- "Yes, I've been waiting for this for at least a few decades!Too bad it's use in a dirty bomb would..."
- "Oddly, you took the time to do that research yet lack the ability to do any at all on the topic..."
- "Sure. And you're the king of diction. A google search for your name and crackpot reveals that you..."
- NASA sees Tropical Storm Kalmaegi weakening over Vietnam
- Size at birth affects risk of adolescent mental health disorders
- Artificial 'beaks' that collect water from fog: A drought solution?
- Parts of genome without a known function may play a key role in the birth of new proteins
- Iberian pig genome remains unchanged after 5 centuries