Politicians want to control their image - and that means controlling the media when they can. And when they can't, that means removing a highly respected journalist in one of the most liberal cities in the country, one that voted 80% for Barack Obama during the 2008 election - and even re-elected Nancy Peloso in 2010.
Part of the press' job is to strip away the cloaks and veneers politicians and their media flaks create. But they have rules and one of them is that if you are a 'pen and pad' reporter, you shouldn't take video with your phone, it seems - especially if the video is a protester of Pres. Obama.
A 2009 blog by the White House Director of New Media stated that "President Obama is committed to making his administration the most open and transparent in history."
The day before the reporter was banned for filming a protest a week earlier, Pres. Obama sat with confirmed misogynist yet wealthy Democratic donor Mark Zuckerberg and said, "The main reason we wanted to do this is, first of all, because more and more people, especially young people, are getting their information through different media. And historically, part of what makes for a healthy democracy, what is good politics, is when you've got citizens who are informed, who are engaged."
And the White House Press Correspondents' Association guidelines say, "Print poolers can snap pictures or take video. They are not obliged to share these pictures...but can make them available if they so choose."
So why were S.F. Chronicle Carla Marinucci and possibly other Hearst reporters from the press pool covering the President in the Bay Area under threat of being banned? No one knows, because Press Secretary Jay Carney and his staff refuse to discuss it on the record - but off the record, Marinucci's associates confirm the banning was put in place and, if it was reported, they were told, the ban would extend to all of Hearst.
Presidents can certainly create mythologies. One of those is that they care about transparency and openness. The last President who didn't talk about it, but actually let some new media air into the room? Republican Dwight Eisenhower, when he allowed cameras in 1952.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Suggestion: The EM Drive Is Getting The Appropriate Level Of Attention From The Science Community
- It's Naive To Pretend Differences Between Women And Men Are Just Genetics
- Bang! Meet The Highest-Energy Hadron Collision Ever Imaged!
- Will Aspartame Critics Now Be Less Bitter?
- GMOs Have Formaldehyde? Bizarre Claim Challenged By Experts
- Bees: Activists Remain Silent While This Pollinator Killer Decimates Millions
- Vladimir Putin Thinks The World Of Sepp Blatter
- "OK thats interesting, you got me thinking about light and momentum etc. It makes sense that..."
- "Hi RobertRelativistic momentum is P = E/c and E = hf for photons. So not *just* Planck's constant..."
- "Unfortunately the real reason is not forgetting to include a step in the methods section. It is..."
- "Your post is precisely why there is so much misinformation about this nonsense. Crooke's Radiometer..."
- "I really enjoy James Burkes connections style history!..."
- Environmental activists are ignoring the real bee killer
- Corporate leader’s science creds under attack
- Rare bacteria cause outbreak in NYC
- John Stossel rips the EPA and NRDC too. Because they’re practically the same thing
- Fact checking pHony water
- Hopewell NJ votes gas pipeline off the island; why not shut down your entire energy supply to save Mother Earth?
- How bees naturally vaccinate their babies
- Mild hypothermia in deceased organ donors improves organ function in kidney transplant
- Trying to quit smoking? First strengthen self-control
- Paralyzed men move legs thanks to non-invasive spinal cord stimulation
- California 'rain debt' equal to average full year of precipitation