Politicians want to control their image - and that means controlling the media when they can. And when they can't, that means removing a highly respected journalist in one of the most liberal cities in the country, one that voted 80% for Barack Obama during the 2008 election - and even re-elected Nancy Peloso in 2010.
Part of the press' job is to strip away the cloaks and veneers politicians and their media flaks create. But they have rules and one of them is that if you are a 'pen and pad' reporter, you shouldn't take video with your phone, it seems - especially if the video is a protester of Pres. Obama.
A 2009 blog by the White House Director of New Media stated that "President Obama is committed to making his administration the most open and transparent in history."
The day before the reporter was banned for filming a protest a week earlier, Pres. Obama sat with confirmed misogynist yet wealthy Democratic donor Mark Zuckerberg and said, "The main reason we wanted to do this is, first of all, because more and more people, especially young people, are getting their information through different media. And historically, part of what makes for a healthy democracy, what is good politics, is when you've got citizens who are informed, who are engaged."
And the White House Press Correspondents' Association guidelines say, "Print poolers can snap pictures or take video. They are not obliged to share these pictures...but can make them available if they so choose."
So why were S.F. Chronicle Carla Marinucci and possibly other Hearst reporters from the press pool covering the President in the Bay Area under threat of being banned? No one knows, because Press Secretary Jay Carney and his staff refuse to discuss it on the record - but off the record, Marinucci's associates confirm the banning was put in place and, if it was reported, they were told, the ban would extend to all of Hearst.
Presidents can certainly create mythologies. One of those is that they care about transparency and openness. The last President who didn't talk about it, but actually let some new media air into the room? Republican Dwight Eisenhower, when he allowed cameras in 1952.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Part I: Bee Deaths Mystery Solved? Neonicotinoids (Neonics) May Actually Help Bee Health
- Microwave Electron Guns: A Field-Emission Plug-And-Play Solution
- Ancient Buried Canyon In South Tibet Rules Out Tectonic Aneurysm
- Interstellar Is A Dangerous Fantasy Of US Colonialism
- In A Snowstorm, Do You Want Salt Or Vegetable Juice On Your Road?
- The BPA Paradox – Too Many Studies?
- Extraordinary Claims: Review My Paper For $10
- "Way to miss the point of the article, genius. Let me guess, you call yourself a nice guy?..."
- "Seriously? You reveal the final scene of a movie and yet do not provide a spoiler alert in advance..."
- "Well, that is not a great example. If you prefer basketball, you don't watch the NBA at all. ..."
- "Men are better athletes than women. If someone had a choice between watching the NBA and the WNBA..."
- "Why did you find it interesting? It's a rather bland political statement by someone not even in..."
- Investigational drug reduces high potassium levels in chronic kidney disease patients
- Study: Doubling saturated fat in the diet does not increase saturated fat in blood
- Women with serious mental illness less likely to receive cancer screenings
- Only half of patients take their medications as prescribed
- Rare new species of plant: Stachys caroliniana