Fake Banner
By Tom Rees | April 14th 2009 03:03 PM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
About Tom

Tom, an Australian national, lives in Brighton, on the south coast of England. He graduated from Southampton University with a BSc in physiology...

View Tom's Profile
Religion and mental health seems to be a double-edged sword. Religion features in a lot of psychotic delusions, but there's also a lot of evidence linking religious belief to better mental health. There's some new research which suggests that part of the problem in teasing out the relationships is that it's not belief itself, but rather the type of god that you believe in, that matters.

The data came from a 2004 US survey on religion and health, which included measures of what people thought about god, and also a variety of health measures including some standard psychiatric scales.

The researchers took out all those who said they had no religion (just 3%). What's more they found no effect of how religious people said they were, or how often they went to church. So this is not a study comparing religion with nonbelief.

The essence of what they found is shown in the graph.

They looked at whether people agreed with each of three statements describing god:
  • Close and Loving,

  • Approving and Forgiving, or

  • Creating and Judging.


<

Believers in a close and loving god had the lowest incidence of a range of psychoses, especially anxiety. Belief in a creator/judge god had the opposite effect.

Last year they also showed that there is a similar relationship between beliefs about the afterlife and mental health. People who believed that the afterlife will bring nice things, like union with god, peace and tranquillity, reunion with loved ones, or paradise, were less psychotic. Those who thought that there is no afterlife, or that the afterlife is just a pale and shadowy life, or even those that it would bring reincarnation or the possibility of punishment had more psychoses.
 
So what's going on? Of course there's a significant chicken and egg problem here. Is it that particular religious beliefs making people less psychotic, or is it simply that psychotic people have negative opinions of both other people and of god?

But Kevin Flannelly, the lead researcher, has a theory to explain these results. He suggests that there is a system in the brain that's specifically designed to alert you to threats in the environment around you (the Evolutionary Threat Assessment System, or ETAS).

Dysfunction of this system, he believes, underpins a lot of mental health problems. The idea is that activation of the ETAS causes a decrease in the sense of security and also an increase in psychiatric symptoms.

Flannelly thinks that belief in a close and loving god (i.e. a protective one that's looking out for you)  decreases activation of the ETAS.

To be sure, alternative theories abound - in particular attachment theory, which suggests that God acts as a surrogate parent. But this doesn't explain why belief in a loving god does not reduce somatisation.

Whatever the cause, Flannelly's results are further evidence that positive beliefs about God are linked to less psychosis, especially anxiety-related psychosis (see also Xanax of the people)

Originally posted at Epiphenom.
_____________________________________________________________________________________

ResearchBlogging.orgFlannelly, K., Galek, K., Ellison, C.,&Koenig, H. (2009). Beliefs about God,
Psychiatric Symptoms, and Evolutionary Psychiatry Journal of Religion and Health DOI: 10.1007/s10943-009-9244-z

Flannelly, K.,& Galek, K. (2009). Religion, Evolution, and Mental Health: Attachment Theory and ETAS Theory Journal of Religion and Health DOI: 10.1007/s10943-009-9247-9

Comments

adaptivecomplexity
I'm not surprised a belief in reincarnation induces anxiety - for most of us, it could get so much worse next time around.

Interesting study.


Mike

Larry Arnold
Reincarnation certainly does my head in, prompting me into areas where no rationalist should tread without the protection of a proverbial tin foil helmet.

Let us start with the popular notion that most people who favour this ideology have - that they must have had a previous life (usually something exotic, but that is by the by).

If there has been a growth in population, not to mention even an exponential growth, it cannot possibly be so that everyone has had a previous life. Either new souls are coming into being all the time, or there is some other mechanism.

So if one starts with a constant number of souls, and assumes that the soul in between incarnations inhabits something other than linear time (all things are possible to the theologian remember) then it gets interesting, because the soul does not have to be incarnated along the arrow of entropy. That is to say, why does one always have to be the reincarnation of someone who died before they were born? Why can one not be the re-incarnation of someone yet to be born who died/will die (language is very flexible here) in the future?

It gets worse, because if that is possible, why cannot one soul actually be incarnate in several bodies at the same time?

I dreamed this whole peculiar notion up some time in my teens (as teens are wont to do) and called it 'multiple re-entrant co-incarnation'.

I had forgotten all about this until I got into conversation with a group of 'new agey' types, and in an attempt to argue the absurdity of the concept of re-incarnation I failed miserably having the opposite effect since one of my disputants  went so far as to proclaim that my proposition of 'multiple re-entrant co-incarnation' must be true and went on to tell others of the notion with the zeal of a convert.

Did I inadvertently start a cult back there ?

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><span>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
CAPTCHA
If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.