Ancient Northern Europeans Looked More Like Vanessa Williams Than Aryan Supermen
    By News Staff | January 26th 2014 12:30 PM | 11 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

    In the late 19th century, classification of humans was in vogue and a lot of it was done based on languages and physical characteristics. Physical anthropology and ethno-linguistics created the Aryan classification among Caucasians, meaning people of Europe and western Asia whose language descended from a common root and who shared physical/biological characteristics also.

    The term Aryan became common among scholars of the day and science-fiction author H.G. Wells, a famous progressive eugenics proponent, popularized it in his best-selling The Outline of History, though it had been criticized decades earlier for being inaccurate. Yet the image created by the French anthropologist Vacher de Lapouge that Aryans were long-headed "dolichocephalic-blond" Europeans - and superior to other others because of their skulls - remained.

    Science has a lot more tools available now and an analysis of La Braña 1, a 7,000 year old specimen from the the Mesolithic Period, debunks those who had such a Teutonic predisposition once again; rather than being blonde, the first recovered genome of an European hunter-gatherer shows that they probably had dark skin. At least the blue eyes were correct.

    The La Braña-Arintero site was discovered in 2006 and excavated by Julio Manuel Vidal Encinas, archaeologist of the Council of Castilla y León. The cave, located in a cold mountainous area with a steady temperature and 1,500 meters below the sea level, contributed to the "exceptional" preservation of the DNA from two individuals found inside, and they were called La Braña 1 and La Braña 2. 

    The study by Carles Lalueza-Fox, researcher from the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), in collaboration with the Centre for GeoGenetics (Denmark) is published in Nature.

    The Mesolithic, a period that lasted from 10,000 to 5,000 years ago (between the Paleolithic and the Neolithic), ends with the advent of agriculture and livestock farming, coming from the Middle-East. The arrival of the Neolithic, with a carbohydrate-based diet and new pathogens transmitted by domesticated animals, entailed metabolic and immunological challenges that were reflected in genetic adaptations of post-Mesolithic populations. Among these is the ability to digest lactose, which the La Braña individual could not do. 

    Lalueza-Fox says, "However, the biggest surprise was to discover that this individual possessed African versions in the genes that determine the light pigmentation of the current Europeans, which indicates that he had dark skin, although we can not know the exact shade." 

    CSIC researcher, who works at the Institute of Evolutionary Biology (a joint centre of CSIC and the University Pompeu Fabra (UPF), located in Barcelona, adds: "Even more surprising was to find that he possessed the genetic variations that produce blue eyes in current Europeans, resulting in a unique phenotype in a genome that is otherwise clearly northern European." 

    So while boring old science will note he looked something like this:

    Credit: PELOPANTON / CSIC)

    We can also speculate the women looked something like this...

    Vanessa Williams. Credit and link: InStyle magazine

    ...which is sure to make Hollywood producers happy because, really, movies about ancient people can't star that guy.

    The study of the genome suggests that current populations nearest to La Braña 1 are in northern Europe, such as Sweden and Finland. In addition, the work points out that La Braña 1 has a common ancestor with the settlers of the Upper Paleolithic site of Mal'ta, located in Lake Baikal (Siberia), whose genome was recovered a few months ago.

    Lalueza-Fox concludes, "These data indicate that there is genetic continuity in the populations of central and western Eurasia. In fact, these data are consistent with the archeological remains, as in other excavations in Europe and Russia, including the site of Mal'ta, anthropomorphic figures –called Paleolithic Venus– have been recovered and they are very similar to each other". 

    According to Iñigo Olalde, lead author of the study, "the intention of the team is to try to recover the genome of the individual called La Braña 2, which is worse preserved, in order to keep obtaining information about the genetic characteristics of these early Europeans."

    Citation: Iñigo Olalde, Morten E. Allentoft, Federico Sánchez-Quinto, Gabriel Santpere, Charleston W. K. Chiang, Michael DeGiorgio, Javier Prado-Martinez, Juan Antonio Rodríguez, Simon Rasmussen, Javier Quilez, Oscar Ramírez, Urko M. Marigorta, Marcos Fernández-Callejo, María Encina Prada, Julio Manuel Vidal Encinas, Rasmus Nielsen, Mihai G. Netea, John Novembre, Richard A. Sturm, Pardis Sabeti, Tomàs Marquès-Bonet, Arcadi Navarro, Eske Willerslev& Carles Lalueza-Fox, 'Derived immune and ancestral pigmentation alleles in a 7,000-year-old Mesolithic European', Nature January 26 2014 doi:10.1038/nature12960


    This is old news, and Vanessa Williams is part African. The connection is quite pathetic. Had you actually READ the results, and maybe the gene sampling, you'd realize that they are still ethnic Europeans and not Africans as you claim. The women would look more like Italian women than Africans.

    The study does not talk about Ancient North Europeans. It talks about Eurasians.

    This journalist did not read the paper.

    The study of the genome suggests that current populations nearest to La Braña 1 are in northern Europe, such as Sweden and Finland
    Seems pretty clear.
    Uhm. Not Northern Europe. At all.

    rofl, this article is ridiculous and totally debunked.

    According to a libtarded journalists who didn't read the paper. The paper mentions Eurasians, not Northern Europeans.
    Yet another attempt to wipe out European history. You only have to read upto the 3rd paragraph to realise where it's going. Propaganda nonsense.
    That's true about the Neanderthals. The skin colour doesn't necessarily tell much, especially considering "he had dark skin, although we can not know the exact shade."

    The Vanessa Williams picture adds to the hilarity of it, despite clearly having lots of Caucasian DNA she still straightens it. From what I can see there's no mention or evidence in the artistic impression of La Braña 1 having a Brillo pad for hair or a spade nose. So it's unlikely a female version would've looked like her. That's just wishful liberal thinking.
    The way the same article is presented on this site is a bit better. It just presents the finding without the liberal slant.
    Are there a link to any more of Carles Lalueza-Fox writings that you know of?
    Dark skin does not a negro make. There are humans in this world with dark skin who are certainly not of african decent.

    If you read a few paragraphs into the paper it says:
    To investigate the relationship to extant European samples, we conducted a principal component analysis (PCA) and found that the approximately 7,000-year-old Mesolithic sample was divergent from extant European populations (Extended Data Fig. 3a, b), but was placed in proximity to northern Europeans (for example, samples from Sweden and Finland)
    And the find itself was in southwestern Europe. 

    I am not sure where you get this stuff (you and the other commenters must be coming from the same site because you all say the same thing and get it wrong) or why you think it is an attempt to 'wipe out' European history, since there is none from 7,000 years ago. 
    Humans originated in Africa, genius. Thus, we are ALL of African decent. Defend that white power Aryan mythos though, you morons would likely be screaming master race if someone invents a time machine and takes you back and shows you that the first race wasn't white.

    Of course you are wrong. Many dark skins people like Aborigines and people in India orginate from Africa.

    There are humans with white skin who are considered Caucasian but are of African negro descent on maternal, paternal or both sides of their ancestry. Western Europe, United States, South Africa, South and Central America are full of them.

    I wonder what Y-haplogroups those two individuals had? I1* or N*?

    "you'd realize that they are still ethnic Europeans and not Africans as you claim."

    Actually, neither is accurate, because there was no "Europe" nor "Africa" at that time. Ethnicity and race as social constructions, and I highly doubt any of these people identified themselves or others as either. Anthropological perspective is 100% in agreement with the article's biological perspective and Hank's historical one.

    Yup, if the science doesn't fit your prejudices you say the Libtards did it. Is this site sponsored by the Pioneer Institute, BTW. We live in a dangerous world if people feel they are free to reject science they don't like out of hand.