In time for Valentine's Day, researchers have determined which champagne glass size will give drinkers the optimal experience.
A new study highlights the effects that champagne glass shape and temperature can have on carbonation upon serving - and therefore the drinking experience. The researchers, led by Gerard Liger-Belair (GSMA), Guillaume Polidori (GRESPI) and Clara Cilindre (URVVC) of the University of Reims in France, studied the gaseous CO2 and volatile organic compounds like ethanol in the space above the champagne surface after it is poured into either a tall, narrow flute or a wide, shallow coupe. The progressive CO2 and volatile organic compounds (VOC) losses escape in the form of bubbles (effervescence) and by “invisible” diffusion through the free surface of the glass. They found a much higher concentration of the gas above the flute than the coupe. Carbon dioxide is a potent irritant in the nasal cavity, as are many other organic compounds, which partly accounts for the very different drinking experiences from the two glasses.
Scheme illustrating the two well-defined valve sampling injection valve positions in the headspace above the champagne surface, whether champagne is served into the coupe (a) or into the flute (b) (dimensions are indicated in mm). doi:info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030628.g001
These results were also visualized by micro-gas chromatography and infrared thermography, which provided images of the gas escaping from the champagne surface. The authors also determined that decreasing the champagne temperature decreased ethanol vapor concentrations in the headspace of a glass but had no impact on the level of gaseous CO2 found above the flute.
These results "might be a precious resource to depict champagne consumer's sensation according to various tasting conditions," says Cilindre.
Citation: Liger-Belair G, Bourget M, Pron H, Polidori G, Cilindre C (2012) Monitoring Gaseous CO2 and Ethanol above Champagne Glasses: Flute versus Coupe, and the Role of Temperature. PLoS ONE 7(2): e30628. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030628
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- An Easy Problem
- Nobel Prize Validates Chinese Medicine? Nope.
- Thank You Guido
- Mother Jones Hates Scientists - And Their Bias Shows
- Prenatal BPA Exposures (Don’t) Affect Birth Weight
- Coincidence Or Conspiracy? Investigating If Believers Really See So Much Secret Design
- Nobel Prize To Neutrino Oscillations
- "It is unlikely anyone did anything to you. And most of the slaves - before importation was outlawed..."
- "Yes, the war on guns will be about as successful as the war on drugs. Just say No! 3D-printed guns..."
- "Yes, we people of color need mental health care; we hallucinated white-perpetrated slavery, segregation..."
- "I am betting you need mental health care. You are trying to contend that the color of skin - but..."
- "Indeed, the name of the article is This Is the Lamest Defense of GMO Foods Ever and he false equivalences..."
- Why Is Mother Jones So Afraid Of Science? And Journalism?
- Weight-Loss Surgery Improves Health of Some Diabetics
- Ben Carson Bungles Again, Treating Cancer with Supplements
- No Vax, No School: US Supreme Court Backs NY State
- Remaking the Peanut to Make Schools Safer
- Ancient Chinese Medicine Not Magical, Nobel Prize or Not