Banner
    Controlling Your Kids: Cut Up Their Food And They'll Calm Down
    By News Staff | April 23rd 2014 08:04 AM | 1 comment | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

    Modern Western parents spend a lot of time trying to figure out new ways for kids not to be kids and to force their behavior into narrow ranges. Then modern Western spend a lot of time filling out surveys saying they want their kids to be intelligent, creative and independent. 

    If you are a parent who wants to mollify the animalistic eating behavior of your child, don't give them a chicken drumstick, cut their food into little pieces for them. Yes, whole foods are causing bad behavior, according to a new paper.

    Cornell marketing guru Professor Brian Wansink and colleagues write in Eating Behaviors that, in a (weak) observational study, of 12 kids at a camp over 2 days, when 6-10 year old children ate foods they had to bite with their front teeth— such as drumsticks, whole apples, or corn on the cob— they were rowdier than when these foods had been cut.  

    "They were twice as likely to disobey adults and twice as aggressive toward other kids," said Wansink, Director of the Cornell Food and Brand Lab.


    They you have it. Imagine how docile Western kids would be if you chewed up their food for them.


    Credit: Daniel Miller

    The 12 elementary children were observed over two days at a 4-H summer camp. On the first day, half of the children were seated at one picnic table and were given chicken on the bone that had to be bitten into with their front teeth; the other half were seated at a nearby picnic table and given chicken cut into bite sized pieces. On the second day, the conditions were reversed.

    Each day, two camp counselors instructed the children to stay inside a circle with a 9-foot radius. Both meal sessions were videotaped and evaluated by trained coders who indicated how aggressive or compliant the children were, and if they exhibited any atypical behaviors, such as jumping and standing on the picnic tables.


    That's drumstick causalation right there. Really, this methodology would get kicked out of any journal not devoted to marketing or social sciences.

    Results from both the counselors and coders observations indicated that when children were served chicken on the bone, they acted twice as aggressively, and were twice as likely to disobey adults, than when they were served bite sized pieces of chicken. Furthermore, the children who were served chicken on the bone left the circle without permission more frequently and were more likely to jump and stand on the picnic tables.

    Citation: Brian Wansink, Francesca Zampollo, Guido Camps&Mitsuru Shimizu, 'Biting versus Chewing: Eating Style and Social Aggression in Children', upcoming in Eating Behaviors, DOI:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.03.013


    Comments

    I don't believe that the cutting up a child's meal is the major factor contributes to the manner in which the child will act. i think it has to do with how the child was raised,in what type of household the child was brought up in and generally the manners that the child has. I believe that a child that is generally mischievous will misbehave regardless of his/her food being cut. a child that has manners will in turn also act in a manner in which she/he is used to behave in. the rules in-forced at the dinner table will be followed but if there are no rules in-forced the child will act as he/she pleases. Yes children love convenience so cutting their food up will make the food easier to eat but this shouldn't be the major contributing factor. u14312434