Like our own world history, the Universe had its own cycle of events. After the initial Big Bang (though 'Bang' is a confusing word, it may have been rather dull), there were no light sources in the Universe. Instead, 370,000 years after the Big Bang electrons and protons combined to form neutral hydrogen gas and released the radiation presently observed as the cosmic microwave background (CMB), so stars and galaxies formed in a kind of cosmic 'Dark Ages' (sans invading barbarians) but those early star-forming galaxies produced enough ultraviolet radiation to ionize most of the intergalactic gas in the Universe, say researchers in Nature.
Their evidence are recent observations made with the Hubble Space Telescope and they say the transformation of this neutral hydrogen into the mostly ionized gas that we see today is thought to have been caused by ultraviolet photons generated by primitive stars and galaxies.
How to know? How much ultraviolet radiation was produced by young stars at early times and what fraction of this ionizing radiation was able to escape from galaxies into the intergalactic medium is at least hypothesized with confidence so the researchers limited their search to properties of galaxies at redshifts near 7, when the Universe was only about 800 million years old.
The authors say that, obviously given some level of uncertainty in an observational Review, the observed galaxy population at that time was sufficient to produce the photons required for cosmic re-ionization.
Caption: A true-color image of the central regions of the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field (HUDF), constructed from the most sensitive near-IR imaging ever obtained. Based on these recent data it has been possible to identify a new population of the most-distant known galaxies (white circles) present when the universe was less than 800 Million years old. These galaxies may be responsible for ionizing intergalactic gas early in the universe's history. Credit: Ross J. McLure (University of Edinburgh, UK), James S. Dunlop (University of Edinburgh, UK), Richard S. Ellis (California Institute of Technology, USA), Brant E. Robertson (California Institute of Technology, USA), and Daniel P. Stark (University of Cambridge, UK).
The installation of the new Wide Field Camera 3 in the HST was a key factor. The first year WFC3/IR observations produced sufficient enough data on high red shift galaxies to make a reliable determination of the galaxy luminosity function but they also had to establish what percentage of the ultraviolet photons were needed to escape to allow reionization and if that happened. But they couldn't measure it directly due to limitations to current methods at redshift 7 so they inferred it based on redshift slopes in lower luminosity galaxies.
Is that bulletproof? No, but future Hubble data can narrow the statistical uncertainties.
Citation: Brant E. Robertson, Richard S. Ellis, James S. Dunlop, Ross J. McLure&Daniel P. Stark, 'Early star-forming galaxies and the reionization of the Universe', Nature November 4, 2010 v 468 doi:10.1038/nature09527
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- What Do EU Countries Give Up When They Opt-out Of GMO Crops? And For Whom?
- Coincidence Or Conspiracy? Investigating If Believers Really See So Much Secret Design
- Nobel Prize Validates Chinese Medicine? Nope.
- An Easy Problem
- Sex Change Hormonal Treatments Alter Brain Chemistry
- Houston Is A Lot More Tolerant Of Immigrants Than Copenhagen Is
- Prenatal BPA Exposures (Don’t) Affect Birth Weight
- "This is a bit of irony: Mother Jones, which can never be bothered with facts or truth and got sued..."
- "Great piece Steve. While the potential for suffering and death in Africa especially thanks to this..."
- "I look forward to more threats and libel from you in the very near future. It's your stock in trade..."
- "Dear Mr. Campbell: Again you spin and dissemble. It was quite clear from the many tweets between..."
- "One of us does not know what libel means (hint: It is you). Calling me a felon and a fraud is libel..."
- FDA-Approved Test for Meningitis is a Home Run
- Trends In Smoking – Chinese Men In Peril, American Women Get Better Cessation
- Counter-Point: Activists Operate By Outrage, Not Fear
- Whole Foods Recalls Organic Roquefort Cheeses After Listeria Found
- Suicide Tries Linked to Weight-Loss Surgery? Study Doesn’t Show
- Following Rules, Refreezing Thawed Meat is Safe
- Beetles provide clues about the genetic foundations of parenthood
- Teens value results of genetic tests to inform future life decisions
- Trees to power: McMaster engineers build better energy storage device
- High dose chemo & stem cell transplantation results in long-term survival for amyloid patients
- 'Blind analysis' could reduce bias in social sciences papers