Social security is in a crisis even worse than Medicare. Because Congress has consistently spent contributions, social security is always on the edge of insolvency and now that the Baby Boomers have begun retiring, the crisis is going to get worse, with not enough workers to fund the retirees.
Ideas such as raising the retirement age are floated by University of Michigen economists have a more positive approach; they say if we stop collecting social security payroll taxes when workers are 55-years old, their take-home pay would jump by 10.6 percent, older people would work 1.5 years longer on average and end up still paying more in income taxes and helping to reduce the Federal deficit while not drawing retirement.
Basically, they say that if every U.S. worker got that automatic 10 percent pay raise at age 55, due to no longer paying into social security, most people would work quite a bit longer to enjoy the extra income before they retired. A large net gain.
"People are living longer, healthier lives, and so far have opted to take most of that extra time as additional retirement rather than work," says economist John Laitner, who conducted the analysis with Dan Silverman."We are proposing a way of responding to this situation through targeted tax-rate changes that would reward older workers for staying on the job and also benefit the economy as a whole."
Using data from the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research (ISR) Health and Retirement Study and from the Consumer Expenditure Survey conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Laitner and Silverman analzyed how tax cuts targeted at older workers would affect the likelihood of working longer and the size of the federal deficit.
"Our idea is to lower the taxes on an individual precisely at the time of life when people are making decisions about whether to work longer or retire," Silverman said.
Workers would need to pay about one percent higher payroll taxes a year until age 55 in order for the Social Security system to break even, the researchers show. This would mean that over their lifetimes, households would pay about $15,000 more in Federal income tax, providing welcome reductions in the Federal deficit.
And workers age 55 and over would see their after-tax earnings increase by a healthy 10.6 percent – inducing them to work longer and enjoy the extra income. Work years beyond age 54 would not affect benefits, and as in the current system, workers could claim benefits as early as age 62 although waiting until full retirement age would continue to be rewarded with higher benefit levels.
"Not everyone would benefit," Laitner said. "Households with a strong preference for very early retirement would pay the slightly higher payroll tax before age 55, but leave the labor force before gaining much from the elimination of the payroll tax after that. Late retirees would, by the same token, be big winners. And the point of the reform, after all, is to encourage work by rewarding it."
Their analysis appears in The Journal of Public Economics.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- A 3 TeV Dielectron Event By CMS !
- Love & Math, A Review Of Edward Frenkel’s Bestseller, A Math Planetarium
- Aspartame: Believe Science, Or A Homeopath Like Joe Mercola?
- Mountain Doomed: CO2 Bubbles And Heart Attacks
- Germany Versus Science, Round Two
- The Dynamical Origin Of Quantum Mechanics (I)
- Why Girls Are Less Interested In Computer Science: Classrooms Are Too 'Geeky'
- "Methanol (wood alcohol) has to be avoided: wood and cigarette smoke; aspartame; fresh tomatoes..."
- "The 1948 paper by Richard P. Feynman on the path integral approach to Quantum Mechanics, Space..."
- "GMO and its associated lethal pesticides and herbicides are dangerous poisons. Eating genetically..."
- "Here's another problem: You have NO idea what you are talking about. A few examples:fyi, the methanol..."