Hybridization Among Primates: What Interbreeding Howler Monkeys May Tell Us About Human Evolution
    By News Staff | December 8th 2012 05:00 AM | 1 comment | Print | E-mail | Track Comments

    Whether or not different species of early humans interbred and produced offspring of mixed ancestry - hybridization - has been the subject of recent studies but the findings are not universally accepted.

    A new study of interbreeding between two species of modern-day howler monkeys in Mexico hopes to shed light on why it's so difficult to confirm instances of hybridization among primates —including early humans — by relying primarily on fossil remains. 

     The researchers did analyses of genetic and morphological data collected from live-captured monkeys over the past decade. Morphology is the branch of biology that deals with the form and structure of animals and plants. The two primate species in the study, mantled howler monkeys and black howler monkeys, diverged about 3 million years ago and differ in many respects, including behavior, appearance and the number of chromosomes they possess. Each occupies a unique geographical distribution except for the state of Tabasco in southeastern Mexico, where they coexist and interbreed in what is called a hybrid zone. 

     Howler monkeys are among the largest of New World monkeys, with male mantled howlers weighing up to 22 pounds. Fourteen species of howler monkeys are currently recognized. They are native to Central and South American forests, in addition to southeastern Mexico.

    Between 1998 and 2008, the researchers sampled 135 adult howler monkeys from Tabasco, Mexico, along with 76 others from Veracruz, Campeche, Chiapas and Quintana Roo states in Mexico and Peten in Guatemala. The field team collected blood, hair and morphometric measurements from the anesthetized animals before releasing them in the same locations. Sample collection from wild monkeys was carried out in accordance with U-M's University Committee on Use and Care of Animals protocol #09319, and in collaboration with researchers at the Universidad Veracruzana in Mexico.

    The animals were weighed, and 16 body-part measurements were made: trunk, tail, leg, foot, arm and hand length; chest and abdominal girth; head circumference and breadth; head, mandible and ear length; interorbital breadth; internasal distance; and testicular volume.

     A total of 128 hybrid individuals were detected. They found that most were likely the product of several generations of hybridization or of mating between hybrids and pure individuals. They analyzed different types of genetic markers, from both mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, to trace the ancestry of each howler monkey they studied. The use of molecular markers made it possible to approximate the relative genetic contributions of the parental species to each hybrid.

    Subsequently, they performed statistical analyses on body measurements and found a large amount of morphological variation in individuals of mixed ancestry. However, when individuals were classified according to the amount of their genome they shared with each parental species, it became clear that individuals of mixed ancestry that shared most of their genome with one of the species were physically indistinguishable from the pure individuals of that species. Even individuals that were more "intermediate" in their genetic composition were not completely intermediate in their appearance.

    The researchers found that individuals of mixed ancestry who share most of their genome with one of the two species are physically indistinguishable from the pure individuals of that species.

    "The implications of these results are that physical features are not always reliable for identifying individuals of hybrid ancestry. Therefore, it is possible that hybridization has been underestimated in the human fossil record," said Liliana Cortés-Ortiz, evolutionary biologist and primatologist at the University of Michigan.

    Anthropologists have attempted to infer hybridization among human ancestral species based on the fossil record. Given the utility of living primate models for understanding human evolution, the howler monkey study suggests that the lack of strong evidence for hybridization in the fossil record does not negate the role it could have played in shaping early human lineage diversity, say the authors.  They say the study is the first to assess genetic ancestry of primate hybrids inhabiting a natural hybrid zone using molecular data to explain morphological variation. 

    So does this lend weight to the hypothesis that neanderthals may have bred with anatomically modern humans tens of thousands of years ago in the Middle East, contributing to the modern human gene pool? They conclude that the process of hybridization - the production of offspring through the interbreeding between individuals of genetically distinct populations- and the factors governing the expression of morphology in hybrid individuals along with the extent of reproductive isolation between species, it should should be given further consideration in future research projects.

     Published in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology


    Okay, I'll bite.
    The article infers that you can compare monkeys with Great Apes where we, all things said, are a subspecies of.
    The distinction is that most monkeys procreate on a fairly tight schedule which is defined by the fertility cycle of the female so: No fertility: No sex, whereas the Great Apes generally
    have a sexual itch that is de-coupled from fertility, so sex takes place; fertile or not female.

    Furthermore, the article does not take into account that the ways females advertise their possibility of fertility with monkeys is extremely specific. It is pheromone driven in combination with visual, auditive and behavioral clues about a female's willingness to engage into procreative activities.
    What while blow the males 'hornpipes' for in species, will at best leave males from other species totally frigid and at worst (more often) invoke aggression.

    With Greap Apes, like the Bonobo (Pan Paniscus) and YES us, the Homo Sapiens Sapiens (I prefer
    to see as Pan Sapiens) and to some extent the Chimp (Pan Trogloditus), the clues are mostly behavioral and to some extent visual, but there are established cases where Chimp and Bonobo get it on and produced viable hybrid offspring.

    Furthermore, since all PAN species are, unlike monkeys, effectively always 'Ready to Roll' they are more likely to find themselves to engage in sex, even if their partner may look a bit funny. I mean, within the Human variation there is plenty of evidence that when 'the kettle is on the boil', matters of aestetic attraction have a tendency of ending up under the bus, and bodily congress will take place anyway. I mean, being (perceived) ugly does not inhibit procreation and in time of need, one peels potatoes with an axe, so if a burly Cro-Magnon meets a winsome Neanderthal wench, there'd be little in the line of aversion to stop them from giving in to their urges and pleasantly seek contentment in the middle.

    I know people within my own species which I would consider abhorrent as sexual mate than I would probably find a pretty and willing Neanderthal mate. Certainly on a cold, dark and windy night, I could very well be able to overlook certain adversely perceived features and just cuddle up. We all know what happens with cuddling up, so that probaly accounts for the 2% to 4% of established Neanderthal genes that I have in my genetic load and which I have bestowed upon my own offspring.