Banner
    Isaiah Scroll Gets A Close-Up - Dead Sea Scrolls Mystery Solved?
    By News Staff | August 6th 2010 09:17 AM | 10 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    The Isaiah Scroll is the oldest-known copy of any book of the Bible and after 12 years of researching the Dead Sea Scrolls,  Robert Cargill, an archaeologist from UCLA, got to visit the underground vault beneath the Shrine of the Book in Jerusalem.

    Religious texts dated between 150 BC and 70 AD and written in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek on parchment or papyrus, the scrolls include the oldest-known surviving copies of the Bible as well as religious commentary that followed the return from the exile in Babylon.  As the on-air investigator for “Writing the Dead Sea Scrolls,” which aired Tuesday, July 27th on the National Geographic Channel, Cargill talked to nine archaeologists and other scholars who are conducting research that is challenging old assumptions about the authorship of the texts. 

    Cargill is known for his work on a three-dimensional computer model of Qumran, a first-century settlement on the shores of the Dead Sea. The Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in 11 nearby caves at various times between 1947 and 1956. In his 2009 book, “Qumran through (Real) Time,” Cargill argued that at least some of the more than 800 scrolls now known to exist were produced at Qumran.


    Archaeologist Robert Cargill examines a full-scale facsimile of the 2000-year-old-plus Isaiah Scroll at Jerusalem's Shrine of the Book.  Credit: UCLA

    “I’ve spent my career reading the work of major scholars involved in the archaeology of Qumran,” said Cargill. “Actually meeting many of them opened up a whole new depth of understanding for me.

    As part of a National Geographic documentary, Cargill visited Qumran and its nearby caves. He also traveled to other first-century settlements on the Dead Sea, including Masada, a mountaintop fortress where similar scrolls were discovered.  He also visits an ancient sewer system beneath Jerusalem that may have been used to smuggle scrolls and other possessions out of the city during the first-century Jewish Revolt.  

    The authorship of the scrolls has been the subject of intense debate since their discovery. They have long been thought to be the handiwork of the Essenes, an obscure breakaway Jewish sect that may have occupied Qumran during the first century A.D. But another hypothesis says different Jewish sects may also have had a hand in producing scrolls. With the destruction of the Second Temple by Roman soldiers in 70 A.D., the sects may have spirited the scrolls through the sewers to the caves around Qumran, tipping the Essenes off to the need to hide their own scrolls there as well.

    "I don't buy it," said Lawrence Schiffman, a professor of Hebrew and Judaic Studies at New York University (NYU), who added that the idea of the scrolls being written by multiple Jewish groups from Jerusalem has been around since the 1950s.  "The Jerusalem theory has been rejected by virtually everyone in the field.  The notion that someone brought a bunch of scrolls together from some other location and deposited them in a cave is very, very unlikely."

    Regarding the Isaiah Scroll, Cargills says.  "Nobody I know has ever been down there.   As a scholar, it’s as close as you can get to a religious experience.”

    Source: Meg Sullivan, UCLA - Scholar highlights new research on Dead Sea Scrolls in TV special

    Comments

    they aren't a "copy" of the bible - since the idea of the bible is fairly modern.

    there wasn't a single volume bible and the scrolls were separated and put back together.

    the individual scrolls were written and edited by a variety of people and eventually ended up in a single book - after some screening for the current agenda and revised and editted and published in many versions

    there has never been any such thing as "the bible", there have been scrolls, there have been collections of selected scrolls and there are edits of that set of selected scrolls for each sub group of christianity

    there are many bibles

    @nina There is only 1 Holy Bible, while there are many different translations=only 1 is TRUE=and that is the ancient scrolls which if you read the article were WRITTEN in hebrew, aramaic and greek the languages of that time period . The oldest transcripts they had before them were only about 1000 yrs old and these go back to possibly 150bc at least prior to 70ad before the destruction of GOD's temple How would you explain there matching up scroll for scroll and letter for letter if they had been so-called editted between 1000yrs difference c'mon. Word's are translated differently in various countries but the meaning remains the same. May GOD/YAHEVAH Bless and keep you.

    Nina is correct, what we call The Bible originated from many separate works, written by separate authors. Over the centuries they underwent a process of editing, eventually becoming merged into one. The Book of Isaiah itself is a good example. The first half of Isaiah does seem to have been written by Isaiah himself who lived in the 700's BC. However chapters 40 thru 66 appear to have been written by someone else living two centuries later.

    Scholars believe that most of The Bible was complete by 450 BC, at the time of the Hebrews' return from the Babylonian exile, still well before the Dead Sea Scrolls.

    @Bill K What scholars? My KJV Bible The WORD of GOD says in the New Testament Isaiah is referred to 21 times, 10 times in the first 39 chapters and 11 times in chapters 40-65. Even Jesus/Yashua referred to him 3 times in the so-called former and once in the latter. Yashua 4 times-is he a liar, GOD forbid. Twice by Matthew, four by Luke, Three by John the Evangelist, twice by John the Baptist and six times by Paul the Apostle. 4+2+4+3+2+6= 21 times referring to the same author, Isaiah teachings from ca. 649bc-588bc.

    Also, the Bible will not be complete until GOD/YEHAVEH sends his SON YASHUA back at the 2nd coming. May YEHAVEH Bless you and keep you.

    Hank
    @Bill K What scholars?
    All of them.  This is not new data.   The KJV was just that - a version - and I am a proud descendant of his.   He used the best sources he could find but they were still translations.    I am not sure what your confusion is.  Do you think all men are flawed except literally everyone who has ever translated a book of the Bible?
    Want more no-nonsense, independent science? Buy Science Left Behind
    @Hank Campbell I still don't know who them is? And since U R a proud descendant of ole KJ, you know he used a couple teams of translators to work on both the Old Testament and the New Testament and what did they use, none other than the ancient Massorah(manuscripts), which is copies of the Hebrew Bible (Massorah manuscripts), ie the Dead Sea Scrolls or like items. BTW-Massorah=mosar=to deliver something into the hand of another, so as to commit to his trust, thats why they had the large and the small massorah added on each page of the manuscripts text, so that over the centuries the translations could not be lost no matter what language you used. Try a Green's interlinear bible it has both ancient text with english translation and use's Strong's Concordance#'s to cross reference Hebrew/Aramic/Chaldee and Greek concordanes and check out KJ's Companion Bible, constructed by one of the greatest scholar's of 19th and 20th centuries=EW Bullinger, also Blue letter bible here on the net. It has all kinds of info and study guides. May GOD/YAHEVAH Bless you and keep you

    the scrolls are not transcripts, they were not dictated to the various writers of the scrolls

    there were many sects of xtians in the early days and each had their own texts - largely lifted from earlier religions, since as Hollywood continues to prove, people like what's familiar - it's an easier sell.

    I am curious how you came to be lucky enough to follow the "one true" version and if you think you'd have come to follow that one if you had been born in a non-christian country?

    as it's said, the only difference between a believer and an atheist is one god - because the beleiver is an athiest to all other faiths expect his own

    and the atheist rejects your one for the same reasons that you reject all the others

    Before the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, the two oldest known versions of the Hebrew Bible were the Masoretic text dating from around 600 AD and the Septuagint, a Greek translation produced in Egypt. As this article states, the Book of Isaiah that was found in the Qumran caves is the oldest copy known.

    handiwork of the Essenes, an obscure breakaway Jewish sect that may have occupied Qumran during the first century A.D. But another hypothesis says different Jewish sects may also have had a hand in producing

    The doubt of originality was known by our creator. Therefor, prophecy and obscure history are included. Unlike other religious writings the prophecies of the bible are 100% accurate. Archeology is also catching up to the historical accounts found in the bible. Many other scientific facts also included like a round world and microbiology are included. It takes more faith to stand outside of these proofs and doubt Christianity than to follow what this world presents as it's truth.