Banner
    Neuroimaging Love - Romance Is More Scientific Than You Think
    By News Staff | October 24th 2010 12:25 AM | 6 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    Do you fall in love using your heart or your brain?   It depends.    For your brain, says a new analysis by Syracuse University Professor Stephanie Ortigue that won't discourage drug use, falling in love elicits the same euphoric feeling as using cocaine,  but it also affects intellectual areas of the brain.  That's a pretty big endorsement of the brain being number one in romance.
    So if love is in the brain and not the heart, is there 'love at first sight' after all?   The science says yes, according to the researchers, who found falling in love only takes about a fifth of a second.
     
    Their meta-analysis revealed that when a person falls in love, 12 areas of the brain work in tandem to release euphoria-inducing chemicals such as dopamine, oxytocin, adrenaline and vasopression. The love feeling also affects sophisticated cognitive functions, such as mental representation, metaphors and body image, which may explain why peoples' abilities and behaviors are all over the psychology map when they are in a new relationship.

    Other researchers also found blood levels of nerve growth factor (NGF), the molecule involved in the social chemistry of humans, also increased. NGF levels were significantly higher in couples who had just fallen in love.

    "These results confirm love has a scientific basis," says Ortigue.

    The findings have interest for neuroscience and mental health research because when relationships don't work out, it can be a significant cause of emotional stress and depression. "It's another probe into the brain and into the mind of a patient," says Ortigue. "By understanding why they fall in love and why they are so heartbroken, they can use new therapies."

    Even better, by identifying the parts of the brain stimulated by love, doctors and therapists can better understand the pains of love-sick patients and maybe ease 'heartbreak'.

    The study also shows different parts of the brain fall for love. For example, unconditional love, such as that between a mother and a child, is sparked by the common and different brain areas, including the middle of the brain. Passionate love is sparked by the reward part of the brain, and also associative cognitive brain areas that have higher-order cognitive functions, such as body image.

    So, seriously, does your heart fall in love or the brain?   Final answer!

    "That's a tricky question always," says Ortigue. "I would say the brain, but the heart is also related because the complex concept of love is formed by both bottom-up and top-down processes from the brain to the heart and vice versa. For instance, activation in some parts of the brain can generate stimulations to the heart, butterflies in the stomach. Some symptoms we sometimes feel as a manifestation of the heart may sometimes be coming from the brain."

    That will have to do for now.  Love remains one of the biggest mysteries in science until further notice.

    Citation: Stephanie Ortigue, Francesco Bianchi-Demicheli, Nisa Patel, Chris Frum and James W. Lewis, 'Neuroimaging of Love: fMRI Meta-Analysis Evidence toward New Perspectives in Sexual Medicine', The Journal of Sexual Medicine, DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01999.x

    Comments

    What a bunch of baloney. There is no such thing as "love at first sight." LUST at first sight, yes, but not love. I am disappointed that even scientists seem to be confusing the two. No matter what initial affection or attraction you might feel, you can't truly love a person until you know who they are.
    If they really want to be scientific about this, they need to define what they mean by "love," maybe go back & reference the ancient Greek terms. The English word "love" is just too imprecise and is used to mean vastly different things.
    Eros (sexual-attraction-love) should be distinguished from Philios (friendship-loyalty-love), Storge (natural-affection-family-love) and Agape (charity-love). I will accept that Eros and Storge love can be "at first sight," but the Philios love that is what keeps a relationship going can only develop over time. So first I think you need to be specific about what kind of love you're talking about, and define it precisely, before you can determine from which part of the brain it comes.

    Sukumar
    Most people understand what is meant by "love at first sight"- it is instant attraction. If you want to call it lust, go ahead, but you need to define the term and show that it is different physiologically from other kinds of love. These are distinctions that have been made on moral or religious, not scientific, grounds,
    Sukumar
    "Does your heart fall in love or the brain?" : Was the idea that a muscle (such as the heart) could fall in love? But then why the heart more than the biceps or the calf of the leg?

    Sukumar
    Because the muscles of the leg are not known to respond to love, whereas the muscles of the heart do.
    Sukumar
    MISLEADING QUOTE! "... researchers, who found falling in love only takes about a fifth of a second" - the "study", which is a review article, does not say anything about the time it takes to fall in love! It (only) studies people already in love, with a partner, and its main findings are that "different types of love involve distinct cerebral networks, including those for higher cognitive functions such as social cognition and bodily self-representation".
    In particular for passionate love it says: "Passionate love activates specific cortical areas with respect to the other types of love. Notably, passionate love recruits brain areas mediating complex cognitive functions, such as body image, self-representation, attention, and social cognition."

    one can read the article here:
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01999.x/full
    (Ortigue S, Bianchi-Demicheli F, Patel N, Frum C, and Lewis JW. Neuroimaging of love: fMRI meta-analysis evidence toward new perspectives in sexual medicine. J Sex Med 2010;7:3541–3552.)

    I read the article and found these quotes are a good summary:
    - "In addition, the present analysis newly demonstrated that different types of love involve distinct cerebral networks inside and outside the dopaminergic-rich brain network."
    - "Interestingly, the present fMRI results demonstrate that love not only recruits subcortical dopaminergic brain areas, but also activates higher-order cortical brain areas. This reinforces the fact that love is more than a basic emotion. Love also involves cognition."
    - "Passionate love activates specific cortical areas with respect to the other types of love. Notably, passionate love recruits brain areas mediating complex cognitive functions, such as body image, self-representation, attention, and social cognition. Interestingly, the presentation of explicit stimuli vs. implicit stimuli led to different cortical activation, notably in the angular gyrus (i.e., a brain area that mediates cognitive functions related to the perception/representation of one's self, which is a critical function with respect to the psychological model of self-expansion of love [80,89]). This suggests that this activation of this brain area might occur mostly at an implicit level. Further studies need to be done to better understand the temporal dynamics of the differential brain mechanisms that take place during the visual presentation of real beloved stimuli in comparison with the visual presentation of conditioned beloved stimuli."

    And here is the article's original ABSTRACT/SUMMARY:
    - Introduction. Brain imaging is becoming a powerful tool in the study of human cerebral functions related to close personal relationships. Outside of subcortical structures traditionally thought to be involved in reward-related systems, a wide range of neuroimaging studies in relationship science indicate a prominent role for different cortical networks and cognitive factors. Thus, the field needs a better anatomical/network/whole-brain model to help translate scientific knowledge from lab bench to clinical models and ultimately to the patients suffering from disorders associated with love and couple relationships.
    - Aim. The aim of the present review is to provide a review across wide range of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies to critically identify the cortical networks associated with passionate love, and to compare and contrast it with other types of love (such as maternal love and unconditional love for persons with intellectual disabilities).
    - Methods. Retrospective review of pertinent neuroimaging literature.
    - Main Outcome Measures. Review of published literature on fMRI studies of love illustrating brain regions associated with different forms of love.
    - Results. Although all fMRI studies of love point to the subcortical dopaminergic reward-related brain systems (involving dopamine and oxytocin receptors) for motivating individuals in pair-bonding, the present meta-analysis newly demonstrated that different types of love involve distinct cerebral networks, including those for higher cognitive functions such as social cognition and bodily self-representation.
    - Conclusions. These metaresults provide the first stages of a global neuroanatomical model of cortical networks involved in emotions related to different aspects of love. Developing this model in future studies should be helpful for advancing clinical approaches helpful in sexual medicine and couple therapy. Ortigue S, Bianchi-Demicheli F, Patel N, Frum C, and Lewis JW. Neuroimaging of love: fMRI meta-analysis evidence toward new perspectives in sexual medicine. J Sex Med 2010;7:3541–3552.

    Hank
    Outside people can't read the study, that's why articles are sent out.   "1/5th of a second"
    is what they said.   "By understanding why they fall in love and why they are so heartbroken, they can use new therapies" was also not in the study because quotes are not in studies.  

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.