Banner
    UDFy-38135539 Is Most Distant Galaxy Ever Measured
    By News Staff | October 20th 2010 12:03 PM | 13 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    Astronomers report they have measured the distance to the most remote galaxy and have found that they are seeing it when the Universe was only about 600 million years old (a redshift of 8.6), making those the first confirmed observations of a galaxy whose light is clearing the opaque hydrogen fog that filled the cosmos at this early time. 

    “Using the ESO Very Large Telescope we have confirmed that a galaxy spotted earlier using Hubble is the most remote object identified so far in the Universe” , says Matt Lehnert (Observatoire de Paris) who is lead author of the paper reporting the results. “The power of the VLT and its SINFONI spectrograph allows us to actually measure the distance to this very faint galaxy and we find that we are seeing it when the Universe was less than 600 million years old.” 

    Studying these first galaxies is extremely difficult. By the time that their initially brilliant light gets to Earth they appear very faint and small. Furthermore, this dim light falls mostly in the infrared part of the spectrum because its wavelength has been stretched by the expansion of the Universe — an effect known as redshift. To make matters worse, at this early time, less than a billion years after the Big Bang, the Universe was not fully transparent and much of it was filled with a hydrogen fog that absorbed the fierce ultraviolet light from young galaxies. The period when the fog was still being cleared by this ultraviolet light is known as the era of reionization.

    UDFy-38135539
    CLICK IMAGE ABOVE FOR LARGER SIZE.   Astronomers using ESO’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) have now measured the distance to the most remote galaxy so far, UDFy-38135539 (the faint object shown in the excerpt on the left), which we see as it was when the Universe was only about 600 million years old (a redshift of 8.6). These are the first confirmed observations of a galaxy whose light is clearing the opaque hydrogen fog that filled the cosmos at this early time.
    Credit:NASA, ESA, G. Illingworth (UCO/Lick Observatory and University of California, Santa Cruz) and the HUDF09 Team.


    Despite these challenges the new Wide Field Camera 3 on the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope discovered several robust candidate objects in 2009 that were thought to be galaxies shining in the era of reionization. Confirming the distances to such faint and remote objects is an enormous challenge and can only reliably be done using spectroscopy from very large ground-based telescopes, by measuring the redshift of the galaxy’s light.

    Matt Lehnert says, “After the announcement of the candidate galaxies from Hubble we did a quick calculation and were excited to find that the immense light collecting power of the VLT, when combined with the sensitivity of the infrared spectroscopic instrument, SINFONI, and a very long exposure time might just allow us to detect the extremely faint glow from one of these remote galaxies and to measure its distance.”

    They obtained telescope time on the VLT and observed the candidate galaxy called UDFy-38135539 for 16 hours. After two months of very careful analysis and testing of their results, the team found that they had clearly detected the very faint glow from hydrogen at a redshift of 8.6, which makes this galaxy the most distant object ever confirmed by spectroscopy. A redshift of 8.6 corresponds to a galaxy seen just 600 million years after the Big Bang.


    A European team of astronomers using ESO’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) has measured the distance to the most remote galaxy so far, UDFy-38135539. By carefully analysing the very faint glow of the galaxy they have found that they are seeing it when the Universe was only about 600 million years old (a redshift of 8.6). These are the first confirmed observations of a galaxy whose light is clearing the opaque hydrogen fog that filled the cosmos at this early time.  Credit:  ESO. Editing: Herbert Zodet. Written by: Richard Hook and Douglas Pierce-Price. Narration: Dr. J. Music: movetwo. Footage and photos: ESO, NASA, ESA, G. Illingworth (UCO/Lick Observatory and University of California, Santa Cruz) and the HUDF09 Team, A. M. Swinbank and S. Zieleniewski, M. Alvarez, R. Kaehler and T. Abel and José Francisco Salgado (josefrancisco.org). Directed by: Herbert Zodet. Executive producer: Lars Lindberg Christensen.

    One of the surprising things about this discovery is that the glow from UDFy-38135539 seems not to be strong enough on its own to clear out the hydrogen fog. “There must be other galaxies, probably fainter and less massive nearby companions of UDFy-38135539, which also helped make the space around the galaxy transparent. Without this additional help the light from the galaxy, no matter how brilliant, would have been trapped in the surrounding hydrogen fog and we would not have been able to detect it”, explains co-author Mark Swinbank (Durham University).

    Co-author Jean-Gabriel Cuby (Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille) remarks: “Studying the era of reionisation and galaxy formation is pushing the capability of current telescopes and instruments to the limit, but this is just the type of science that will be routine when ESO’s European Extremely Large Telescope — which will be the biggest optical and near infrared telescope in the world — becomes operational.”

    Citation: M. D. Lehnert, N. P. H. Nesvadba, J.-G. Cuby, A. M. Swinbank, S. Morris, B. Cle´ment, C. J. Evans, M. N. Bremer&S. Basa, 'Spectroscopic confirmation of a galaxy at redshift z58.6', Nature Oct 21 2010 pp 940-942 doi:10.1038/nature09462

    Comments

    Wondering if there may be a relaiton between that hydrogen fog and Dark matter

    Hank
    Not sure what you mean by 'relation' - they assume a cosmological constant in the study based on the perhaps existence of dark matter and that is how they infer it doesn't have enough photons to ionize the volume necessary for the emissions to escape, meaning a fainter galaxy nearby.
    Bonny Bonobo alias Brat
    “Studying the era of reionisation and galaxy formation is pushing the capability of current telescopes and instruments to the limit, but this is just the type of science that will be routine when ESO’s European Extremely Large Telescope — which will be the biggest optical and near infrared telescope in the world — becomes operational.”
    I wonder when ESO's European Extremely Large Telescope is planned to become operational? Does anyone know?

    G´day Helen... Certainly not earlier than 2018 using the most updated (albeit optimistic) expectations... I myself wouldn´t be surprised if you add some 3-5 years there...

    Amateur Astronomer
    A report in April said operational in year 2018.
    Bonny Bonobo alias Brat
    Thanks guys, a bit of a long wait then :)
    Thanks Mr Campbell. Thanks for taking the time to answer my ? question. Perhaps I should not even be on here?
    Please pardon my ignorance. I have no degree nor formal education in astronomy, Hah, I guess you could tell that.
    I just take great interest in the cosmos in general. and so in my blissful ignorance, i was just wondering
    if that early era hydrogen Fog may have something to do with the unexplainable theoretical Dark matter.?
    Obviously the hydrogen particles were rounded up and used elswhere and so that Fog could not be a leftover fossil of dark matter. Thanks

    Hank
    No worries, we're all here trying to get a little smarter and cosmology is out there - because dark matter is a hypothesis it may end up meaning lots of things but the cosmic fog won't be among them.   We hope - if it does, that introduces a whole new set of problems.    :)

    Nice Macross name, by the way!
    Well, it seems they are quite sure that red shift is proportional to object distance.
    Why so confident about this? Can this be measured without relying on red shift and Hubble law so much?
    Even very weak but omnipresent gravitational field (like gravitational red shift) might influence this measurement significantly. This kind of field is mentioned in many cosmological theories. Standard theory can't explain many things, so we got some magical constructs like Dark Energy (which looks like gravitational field) or Dark Mater. Without good cosmological theory such measurements are useless because Hubble law isn't verified to work correctly for such large distances.

    Hank
    Sure, and you've hit upon the tricky aspect of cosmology - they don't claim in their paper that there is no chance of it being wrong and they are truly in the final frontier.    It sounds like you are saying until the science is perfect nothing can be done - in that instance, you can't have written your comment on a computer since no scientist or engineer can define a magnetic field, yet the $250 billion semiconductor industry uses field theory just fine.  Likewise, we don't know how gravity works at the very large, like in this case, or the very small either, but you won't jump off a building because science can't answer everything.

    I certainly agree some use dark matter today like people used to use religion or aether in the past as a catch-all but these guys have been as rigorous as possible given the tools we have.   If the Obama administration keeps cutting science projects now and promising newer, better stuff 25 years from now, we'll never make advancements.
    Aitch
    If the Obama administration keeps cutting science projects now and promising newer, better stuff 25 years from now, we'll never make advancements.
    I was beginning to think the administration were getting an ammo pile ready to dump on Obama when his time is up....either that, or they're taking magic lessons somewhere away from the eyes of Science...?

    Aitch
    Hank
    In the US, Republicans get lumped in as "anti-science" because most academics vote Democrat for other reasons so it's a good rationalization.  22,000 unemployed NASA people who are out of jobs because Obama decided Bush's Constellation program was dumb (read: it was done by a Republican so we cancel it and announce one with Obama's name on it) have a different take on who is anti-science.     There was even a rather silly partisan hit piece book by a political writer masquerading as a science one blaming all science ills on being Republican - yet when a Democrat was trying to get rid of open access for taxpayer-funded research I was literally the only person in science media who complained.
    Hello!
    Fraternal greetings from a distance ...
    And now with the Senate and House of the elections ...
    how it will affect ...
    like the Republicans and Democrats
    Mark (USA) Northern Great Nation.
    ***
    Caritatis Salutem Fraternam et Scientiae.
    (((((cabd)))))

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.