Whenever I try to explain something about particle physics to a layman, I run into the problem of mass/energy units. A Giga-electronVolt is not something you may expect people to be familiar with, and on the other hand it is not appealing to explain directly how it is defined: "if you take an electron and accelerate it by passing it through a potential difference of one billion Volts, that's the energy it has at the end: one GeV": this distracts the listeners by forcing them to focus on electrostatics, with the potential outcome that the conversation may diverge due to additional questions, like "Does the electric field need be uniform ?" or even, "What is a potential difference ?".
To avoid that kind of trouble you may make the choice of avoiding altogether to mention the funny unit, implicitly equating a GeV to a proton mass. This causes you to end up making statements like "The LHC produces collisions at an energy corresponding to 7000 proton masses", or something similar. The escamotage is effective, but imprecise -a proton only weighs 0.938 GeV, which is over six percent less than a full GeV. And six percent may or may not be relevant to the statements you make. If you do not want to live with that you need to make a correction on the fly, or change system.
A nice, although somewhat problem-specific, solution to the above outreach issue has been concocted by Adrian Buzatu. A post-doc for Glasgow University, where he works at a competitor experiment, ATLAS, but collaborates with me by being a colleague in the CDF experiment, Adrian is also a science writer for a Romanian magazine, EVZ. Wanting to explain the progress made by the LHC experiments in constraining the allowed range of masses of the Standard Model Higgs boson from last summer's results to the most recent ones, Adrian compared the tentative Higgs mass values to the masses of heavy atoms. He thus came out with two sets of periodic tables of elements, with elements compatible with Higgs masses not yet excluded by direct searches highlighted in red.
The Summer 2011 situation saw many elements of the table still compatible with experimental searches for the Higgs boson: these correspond to the mass range 114.4 GeV - 149 GeV, the one where the Higgs production hypothesis had not yet been disfavoured at 95% confidence level.
However, the latest results show a dramatic narrowing down of the masses which are not disfavoured at 95% confidence level:
I think this is a quite nice visualization of the progress made by ATLAS and CMS. For the original article by Adrian (in Romanian) see here.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- The Five Stages Of A Dying Theory
- Something is wrong in the Arctic
- Order Patterned With Chaos - How Climate Is Predicted For Decades - With Exact Forecasts Only For Days
- Is The X(5568) A True Resonance ?
- Anomaly! Book Presentation At CERN On November 29
- Vector Boson Scattering: ATLAS Tests SM Unitarity
- Chess is Smart and Sexy! The Mysterious Psychology of Chess Intelligence 1/3
- "Oh okay maybe they got upset in the same way you did. You could try pointing them towards my Nibiru..."
- "So you can guarantee to me that this is not real yeah thats all i want for this not to be real..."
- "No you don't. It's not real, it's a hoax, any astronomer would just LOL at the idea. These are..."
- "Do I need to do any of that then Mr walker just want the truth are me and my children in any danger..."
- "Oh, don't do any of that. Who has told you to do that? Are they people you would trust with your..."
- Pfizer's Centrum Silver Multivitamins Contain Pesticide, Paint, and Glass
- Fly me to the Moon, but hold the altitude sickness
- What's in an Egg? Demystifying the Labels
- Paper Scandal at Science? Microbeads Lying In the Weeds. With A Stolen Computer.
- Honey, Please Pass The High Fructose Corn Syrup
- A stolen computer and the scandal of a high profile paper