It has taken a while, but the rare decay of B_s mesons (particles composed of a bottom and an anti-strange quark) to muon pairs has finally been seen. The authors of the find -we cannot yet call it an observation given the scarce statistical significance of the signal- are the members of the LHCb collaboration, one of the four experiments working with the proton-proton collisions delivered by the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
The decay of the B mesons to muon pairs are quite rare -of the order of one in a billion- but very important, because they proceed via loop quantum diagrams within which existing particles may circulate. And since these loops are virtual, even very massive particles, even ones we do not know yet about, would produce a significant contribution. So measuring the rate of the rare decays allow us to gauge whether there is new physics in store for us, or whether there is just a desert of Standard Model physics awaiting us at the high-energy frontier.
The CDF and DZERO collaborations at the Tevatron collider have sought for these rare decays for two decades, and now the CERN experiments have taken over. The LHCb detector is quite well suited to spot these decays, since it looks at very forward-going proton-proton collisions, ones which produce B quarks in large amounts. Eventually CMS and ATLAS will take over (they have collected a larger integrated luminosity), so now is the time for LHCb to show their stuff. And they do.
The figure below, hot off the press, shows the LHCb data in a reconstructed dimuon mass distribution. A B_s signal seems to be there (the red component; the blue line is the total fit, which includes backgrounds), although the statistical significance is still in the range where fluctuations might be the real source of the bump. LHCb estimates it as a 3.5 standard deviations effect.
For more information on the analysis, see here. Tomorrow a seminar at CERN will provide all the details on this new search. What can be noted already, despite the fact that the decay has not been "observed" as canonically required with five standard deviations of more, is the fact that many new physics theories receive a hard blow by the very good match between Standard Model prediction and observed rate.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Vitriolic Abuse Of Anita Sarkeesian: Why The Games Industry Needs Her
- Sam Ting On AMS Results: Dark Matter Might Be One Seminar Away
- Why Natural Gas, Including Fracking, Is Better For The Environment Than Wind And Solar
- Factor In Space Bubbles Or The Terrorists Win
- Triclosan In Utero May Disrupt Growth Of Boys, But BPA Doesn't
- Scientists Are Not Trusted By Americans - Here's Why
- Mysterious 1808 Eruption - The Real Cause Of The Coldest Decade Of The Last 500 Years
- "The potential for a discovery is there Anon. It's in the high-energy data and the antiproton data..."
- "It's amazing to see the PR machine that Ting has put together at work. Not only do we have to wait..."
- ":) Actually amphetamine salts were not sustainable as an ADHD solution for me. They actually did..."
- "Hi Hontas. This caught my eye: That said, it may be that there simply is no strong signal of inflation..."
- "1.) Fundamentally one can never prove any theory. That's what makes a theory different from..."
- Stop taking patients in cardiac arrest to hospital, says expert
- Dying brain cells cue new brain cells to grow in songbird
- Being sheepish about climate adaptation
- Asteroid named for University of Utah makes public debut
- Does size matter? MRI imaging sheds light on athletes most at risk for severe knee injury