It has taken a while, but the rare decay of B_s mesons (particles composed of a bottom and an anti-strange quark) to muon pairs has finally been seen. The authors of the find -we cannot yet call it an observation given the scarce statistical significance of the signal- are the members of the LHCb collaboration, one of the four experiments working with the proton-proton collisions delivered by the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
The decay of the B mesons to muon pairs are quite rare -of the order of one in a billion- but very important, because they proceed via loop quantum diagrams within which existing particles may circulate. And since these loops are virtual, even very massive particles, even ones we do not know yet about, would produce a significant contribution. So measuring the rate of the rare decays allow us to gauge whether there is new physics in store for us, or whether there is just a desert of Standard Model physics awaiting us at the high-energy frontier.
The CDF and DZERO collaborations at the Tevatron collider have sought for these rare decays for two decades, and now the CERN experiments have taken over. The LHCb detector is quite well suited to spot these decays, since it looks at very forward-going proton-proton collisions, ones which produce B quarks in large amounts. Eventually CMS and ATLAS will take over (they have collected a larger integrated luminosity), so now is the time for LHCb to show their stuff. And they do.
The figure below, hot off the press, shows the LHCb data in a reconstructed dimuon mass distribution. A B_s signal seems to be there (the red component; the blue line is the total fit, which includes backgrounds), although the statistical significance is still in the range where fluctuations might be the real source of the bump. LHCb estimates it as a 3.5 standard deviations effect.
For more information on the analysis, see here. Tomorrow a seminar at CERN will provide all the details on this new search. What can be noted already, despite the fact that the decay has not been "observed" as canonically required with five standard deviations of more, is the fact that many new physics theories receive a hard blow by the very good match between Standard Model prediction and observed rate.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- How Gut Bacteria Ensure A Healthy Brain – and Could Play A Role In Treating Depression
- Researchers Created A Laser Bullet To See What It Would Look Like - And Here It Is
- We're Too Late To Prevent 137,000 More Ebola Cases, Says Epidemiology Paper
- The Quote Of The Week - Shocked And Disappointed
- The Strange Organic Molecules In Titan's Atmosphere
- Type 1 Diabetes Surges In White Kids
- It Takes More Than Singing To Strike A Chord In Music Education
- "The “non-negotiable mathematical reasons” for raising the height of flood defences are in a..."
- "For background, look at Paul Bloom’s 2004 book Descartes’ Baby. This has interesting material..."
- " It is possible that survival of Ebola virus victims would be much improved if an artificial fever..."
- "Priceless! I really needed a kick in the pants to get me to laugh at myself and this post did it..."
- "You have done an immense amount of work. It would help if you added some boxes to explain how you..."
- US Ebola hysteria and money pit highlight lack of resources to confront diseases that kill far more people
- Addiction can be measured by epigenetics
- Coffee grounds turned biofuel can heat your home
- Bill and Melinda Gates on GMOs: ‘Poor farmers should not be denied choice of life-saving tools’
- Why do foodies love organics? Because they taste like McDonald’s!
- GMO milk? An enviros dream innovation that most enviros oppose
- Global boom in hydropower expected this decade
- For brain hemorrhage, risk of death is lower at high-volume hospitals
- Roman-Britons had less gum disease than modern Britons
- 'Swingers' multiple drug use heightens risk of sexually transmitted diseases
- Were clinical trial practices in East Germany questionable?