Have a look at the figure on the left. It shows the number of visits to this site broken down in hours of the day -the time of the server used by the visitor. The statistics of each bar is sufficient that the uncertainty on their height is of the order of 2%, so almost indistinguishable by eye. What you can see, therefore, are real variations with time of the traffic to this site, and not random fluctuations up and down.
You immediately note the night dip: people stop reading this blog after midnight, and resume after 8AM. Also note its asymmetric nature: the decrease is exponential, with a "hardcore" bottom of sleepless visitors; while the increase after 6AM shows a typical turn-on shape, the one you get if you integrate a Gaussian shape. It reflects the higher and higher active users as the morning progresses, when the time of start of their operations has a Gaussian shape.
But there is much more to note. For instance, the dip at 2PM: it is significant, and evidences the lunch break that some take at around that time. Even more significant is the fall after 5PM, which is due to people leaving office and eventually having dinner. Activities increase again after 9PM, to then drop as night falls.
I think this graph -or similar ones one might draw with large-traffic sites not connected to business- carries some sociological implications. It clearly demonstrates that people spend their working hours on the internet, more than their ours off work. It also gives an idea of the fraction of night browsers, which is larger than I thought. Finally, but this is a less-well founded hypothesis, the decrease of visits from 10AM to 5PM evidences our diminishing attention span as the day progresses.
Do you have similar plots to compare ? I bet there are internet sites which devote a lot of attention to these issues. If you have a good link to share, let me know.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Part I: Bee Deaths Mystery Solved? Neonicotinoids (Neonics) May Actually Help Bee Health
- Bitcoin And Anonymity: User's Identity Can Be Revealed Much Easier Than Thought
- Part II: Bee Deaths And CCD - Flawed Chensheng Lu Harvard Studies Endanger Bees
- Violence, Sex And Taboo: The Original Brothers Grimm Fairy Tales Back In Print
- Reasons Serious Scientists Should Not Fear The Winnower and other OA Open Review Journals.
- Volunteer-Based Peer Review: A Success
- Diversity Fatigue: Why Businesses Struggle To Close The Gender Gap
- "At three weeks into testing using these concentrations, the health of the bee colonies was positively..."
- "As someone who has received NIH funding, I can tell you the answer is magic and pure coincidence..."
- "I never thought of diminutive as having a positive or negative association. I often describe people's..."
- "For the most part, I found your article compelling. It reminded me of the time in graduate school..."
- "Indeed, my little experiment does not prove anything; it is not scalable. Not the $10, not the..."
- Why do people with autism see faces differently?
- Endangered hammerhead shark found migrating into unprotected waters
- Female color perception affects evolution of male plumage in birds
- Diagnosing deafness early will help teenagers' reading development
- 'Utter neglect' of rheumatic heart disease revealed by results from global study