you stupid f*** american creole is not an equivalent to ebonics it is recognized as a languge by all international actors and they offer creole courses in some major us universities. we dont have black vs mulatto crap that you are talking about and since we are more educated than african-american we dont have light skin dark skin arguments idiot do some research on the haitian population, it is because of that we were able to fight for our independence rather than settle for second class citizenship.

I have read all the comments here.
I understand all the sorrow, hurt and pain that goes into trying to find an ultimate "justice" or "injustice"
or reasons for both.
However having lived a life as a person of mixed race, (north european Vs south european, and having lived as a white amongst semitic peoples and as an italian amongst northern europeans and as a north european amongst italians.. an outsider in some countries and an insider in others I can only say that there will NEVER be absolute justice, equality or any form of absolute equalness, there will ALWAYS be a hierarchical form.
EVERY person will have feelings of injustice and ALL people cherish their own values more than others.
ALL people are in some form more linked to what they believe they are.
There MAY be racial types that have different abilities and so what?
BLACK people seen by the nordics eye are very temperamental and more prone to impulse behavior ,which is natural as impassiveness may have been good for survival in another environment than the one we have in industrial societies, but at the same time they traditionally have had and still have a more CREATIVE , and Passionate bent, and they FEEL life probably more than some staid european automation going about his life in stillness.
Feelings were created by nature to instill ACTION and many nordics need to DRINK heavily to FEEL anything, this is why the whole northern Europe drinks every weekend and many die prematurely from having drunk too much alcohol .
On the positive side, Northern Europeans are very well organized, and have a great social society and seem very emphatic, althougnthis lie asians is manly from the fear of crating awkward situations and the fear of being "noticed" a feature of communal tribal societies.
LATIN people as a stereotype (seen from the Nordicis point of view) have more temperamental natures and are more individualistic..but they also have a more cultured approach, less functionally focused than the nordics.
ASIANS have a seemingly communal peaceful approach to life..but the reality is this communality is rooted not in empathy bit in the fear of being outcast and not good enough..the social support systems are not that good even in rich countries like Japan according to my japanese friends..and most of society like n ALL societies are obsessed with hierarchy and SUCESS so this is why most nordic asian societies have the highest level of suicide in the world..people feel shut out, and inadequate i they are not living up to the expectations set for them.
This is the way the universe made process and evolution, by creating hierarchies, processes.

Taller men have an advantage with women.(evolutionary trait)
small men this work harder to gain sucess, power than tall men whom can use charm.
Charm developed as an evolutionary trait to create survival and to get social power.
intelligence developed as a natural selection and developed in people without charm..or beauty.
Peaceful, non temperamental people enjoy a better living standard, regardless of economic power.
People with more communal instincts than individual instincts tend to be less risk prone an overall enjoy happier less dangerous lives.(butmuch more booring, and with a lack of LIFE)
Poor white people feel inferior to middle class white people.
Beautiful people feel superior to ugly people.
(ugly defined by less proportionate and symmetric features)
women like symmetry in faces.
women like symmetry and aesthetics.
women like power because genetically it was in time equal to security and a certain mark of ability and success.
power within certain societies denotes prestige.
in northern societies historically societies developed from small nomadic tribes and there were not many people, and livestock so life was valued and power to any individual seen as dangerous.
Chivalry, empathy and prestige arising from power GIVEN by RESPECT not by taking or fear and use of FORCE has been the tradition amongst Scandinavian societies.
In the north there is a great disrespect from middle class, and intellectual classes for anyone seeking money or fame as its seen as a form of selfishness and the need for power is actually seen as a consequence of ones lack of talent, not being beautiful or enjoyable enough to partake in communal life.
so people with power are often mistrusted and looked down upon.
Why is it so?
In northern europe which was historically less populated by people and livestock, all life forms were more valued which has created a survival instinct amongst northern europeans to value life and to have a certain capacity for empathy-this is why although you see many privileged people from the north you often see these people also helping, and often the women or people from the most well -off families decide to take a life of servility to help poor people, because its respected.
And so goes life, its not possible to say that something is not fair or to clander, or judge people for being what they are..and it has no meaning to search for justice based on absolute fairness or equalness or any other such measure.
the only thing one can do is follow ones instinct to hopefully have a heart filled with more love than hate,
use knowledge that loving feelings create more good and good repercussions than hateful feelings trust and know that if one does good towards others and if ones values are not about prestige but about living an "examined life" than one will not be subject to anyones prejudice or judgement and even if one is ( I am short so i know) then so what?
Tall people may enjoy sexual advantages, but they work for short people.
The point is that we are all different and thank god for that!
Stop looking for the half empty glass and start looking at all thats god and what YOU can do to give back
and to LIVE.
And stop COMPARING, and start APPRECIATING nuances, and SEEING differences.
Life is but 25.000 days on average and most of that is spent growing up, or getting old or sleeping what we have left, 10000 days of good time better be spent thinking positive thoughts and LOOKING at the whole picture and just BE happy to BE!
it will all end soon enough anyway its just a chemical process and earth in statistical terms does not have many years left..so ENJOY what you have.look at the poetic side of life!

I know this is a late post, but you really should have done more research before posting your observations.

Only the first person in your video clips may have been "mulatto". When we say that someone is a mulatto, they appear more white than Black -- much, much whiter than most American Blacks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPHnHRNJGLY .

The Haitian flag -- originally black and red -- represents the unity of Blacks and mulattoes. The LEGAL history of Haiti during French slavery and colonialism was far different from slavery in America -- Haitian mulattoes were very often emancipated, could be educated, and could be the legal heirs to their White forbears. This meant that they eventually accumulated great wealth and could even thwart plans to end slavery or own slaves. The only reason this ended was because they realized that while have more right than slaves, they would not be given certain rights available to White French citizens.

After the end of slavery, mulattoes held on to wealth and property and occupied the highest levels of all political spheres and dominated politics. This excluded people of predominantly African descent and allowed them to be exploited. There were overt actions by elites/mulattoes to keep Africans out of any political and economic domination which increased poverty.

It is not a good idea to compare "colorism" in Haiti to that of the USA, or to think that race and racism are expressed in the same ways in the Caribbean and Latin America -- the laws and history are simply different, and their are real implications. It was also pretty insulting to imply that darker skinned Blacks in Haiti are simply imaging history or inventing a bias, rather than citing history. It's a really serious error when publishing any article on a significant subject.