Science can't catch a break this week. A site devoted to ridiculing Democrats is faux outraged that the NIH funded $3.6 million to study the menstruation cycles of rhesus monkeys on any number of addictive drugs.
That's not really one you or I can criticize the way they do. For starters, that money was over a 10-year period and evaluating pharmacological interventions is necessary because drug addiction is an expensive problem, both for the economy and the culture. Does hormonal status impact drug abuse and addiction? If so, that would be downright revolutionary and exactly the kind of transformative research we should be funding. I am critical of funding for non-science and also waste because both of those things limit actual research funding, so this is okay even if I don't much care what might happen to the menstrual cycles of drug addicts. At least the NIH isn't funding political science think tanks and subsidizing science magazines the way the NSF is.
Anyway, trumping up hyperbole about studies on addiction being a legitimate waste issue is a lose for Republican credibility in science this week.
But Democrats have been just as stupid.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a fringe progressive if there is one, sought to protect NIH funding by invoking that research had "a Biblical power to cure in a very, very special way". Is she trying to be clever? Metaphorical? I assume scientists on her side will rationalize that she is trying to appeal to the religious rubes in the Republican party (and aren't they all rubes?) but she is a flat-out kook, who is just as anti-science as the anti-vaccine hippies in Washington state and shouldn't be let off the hook because she is defending more spending - there is every chance she believes the NIH is a way to perform religious miracles if its budget goes up.
Anyway, if a Republican said something so goofy about science research I assume more than one person in the blogosphere would notice.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Part I: Bee Deaths Mystery Solved? Neonicotinoids (Neonics) May Actually Help Bee Health
- Part II: Bee Deaths And CCD - Flawed Chensheng Lu Harvard Studies Endanger Bees
- Bitcoin And Anonymity: User's Identity Can Be Revealed Much Easier Than Thought
- Is The Micropower Revolution Here?
- Not Neonics: Parasites Are Bad For Honey Bees
- Chronic Pain Isn't All In The Brain
- On integrating out short-distance physics
- "I have always thought that that formulas like (1) are not clear . If G(u) is a primitive of f(u)..."
- "I am indeed checking with vanEnglesdorp even though the matter seems quite clear cut to me: showing..."
- "Hi, the comics linked below seems to deal with a similar stuff. http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=3554#comi..."
- "they don't see how it damages the economic system that made America great in the past. Huh? Empirical..."
- "Hank, any experiment/study can test any thesis. If Lu's goal was to test field realistic doses..."
- Two studies identify a detectable, pre-cancerous state in the blood
- Nervous system may play bigger role in infections than previously known
- NIAID/GSK experimental Ebola vaccine appears safe, prompts immune response
- Heat-conducting plastic developed at U-Michigan
- Trial shows new imaging system may cut X-ray exposure for liver cancer patients
Books By Writers Here