The Rock And The Hard Place Of Homer
The well-known expression: 'between a rock and a hard place' almost certainly has its earliest origins in Homer's Odyssey. In that saga, Ulysses has to take his ship between Scylla and Charybdis, two rock-monsters which are a bow-shot apart. It is impossible to avoid both monsters - a course must be steered which leads to the least loss of life.
Unravelling Homer's Yarn
Aspirations of winning the Nobel? Maybe a purchase at this shop will help you along your journey. Or at least you can say you knew the shop
back when it was just a little shop in Philadelphia, instead of a famous retail laureate.
On a science site, we can make anything about science, including religious holidays. Of course, there are some things that we can never know, because they involve the subjective nature of people and a history that's necessarily muddled. We can't get people to agree on what happened during the Bush presidency despite millions of monkeys writing about it on the internet so deciphering what happened and why some 2,000 years ago is a special sort of impossible.(1)
Using Encryption to Block Spam
Tackling the problem of spam is a problem in communication. If spam is noise as against wanted communications, then the spam problem is a signal to noise filtering problem. Unwanted emails, especially broadcast spam emails, consume about 80%
of currently available bandwidth. We need to filter out the 80% noise so as to increase the efficiency of the web in distributing the 20% of traffic that is the wanted signal.
Every once in a while people ask me about various features or functionality so, since it's a Saturday on a holiday weekend and there won't be as many people reading as usual (who want good science and not rubbish from me) I figure this is a good time.
1) The comment tracker in the upper right is my default way to know what is going on. Why? Because I have a lot of people on my friend list so if one of you has commented on an article, the comment tracker tells me; that basically means the community has already done the work telling me what is worth talking about.
A surprisingly warm sunny morning sparked a return trip to the Cretaceous-Jurassic exposures near Harrison Lake, British Columbia. The lake and hotsprings at Harrison are an easy one to two hour drive from Vancouver. My work leads me a ways past the town exploring logging roads along the lake.
Without goggles you could easily lose an eye working the unyielding siltstones. Much of my collecting was spent wincing as small, bullet-like projectiles went pinging past my face… others making contact but not enough to deter my efforts. No pain no gain.
Part 1, which begins our examination of the question 'what is time?' can be viewed here
Part 2 Some travels through time can be viewed here
Part 3 discussing language, sequence and order, can be viewed here
Part 4 a brief discussion of clocks, Steno, Foucault and Allais, can be viewed here
this blog on time is speculative
, not established fact.
There is bad science and then there is bad science, that is to say there is science which does not meet with the standards of care and objectivity through lack of skill, and competence and then there is science which is rotten to the core, because either it’s practice, or it’s ends are unethical.
Which of the two is most predominant I could not say, it would require me to make up a best guess statistic, which might be bad in both senses. However whilst the former is unethical if there is no intent to take on board the critics and corners continue to be cut, I do not regard it in anything like the same light as science which is downright unethical by any measure.
Lest we let you wander the streets thinking that the people of Pittsburgh are either really cool or really weird
or both. Here is the real story
on the Google/artist/community collaboration.
A recently released British film The Age of Stupid
, uses good science
to good effect in a projection of a possible future. The theme is that if we do nothing about global climate change, then we are not living in an age of reason, but in an age of stupid. In another blog, I posed the question: Is this the age of stupid?
I propose to name the not stupid
, and shame the stupid