Banner
Completely Objective Resolution Of The Who To Sacrifice Dilemma

The well-known moral dilemma about sacrificing a few to save many has now been answered by extraction...

Identity Crisis: Authenticity Versus Suppression Of Cognitive Dissonance

As a researcher in the fields of exact science and philosophy, I am obsessed with “truth”,...

The Power Grab Of Science Vs Critical Theory

Those who know the meaning of ‘third culture’, know that since the days when it was lamented...

Nanotechnology Superdangerous Biotech

Globally existential threats due to ‘overpopulation momentum’ together with the top-heavy age...

User picture.
picture for Tommaso Dorigopicture for Samuel Kenyonpicture for John Hasenkampicture for Gerhard Adampicture for Bente Lilja Byepicture for Thor Russell
Sascha VongehrRSS Feed of this column.

Dr. Sascha Vongehr [风洒沙] studied phil/math/chem/phys in Germany, obtained a BSc in theoretical physics (electro-mag) & MSc (stringtheory) at Sussex University, UK, and subsequently researched... Read More »

Blogroll

The fourth FQXi essay contestWhich of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong? is underway.

 

Direct Realism falling in Wittgenstein’s Silence: Accelerating the Paradigm Change that Renders Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Natural

Almost exactly a year ago, I made a medium storm in the water glass by publishing my exchange with what I ironically called the "Future King of Physics". I then asked Perimeter Institute in Canada, Oxford University, and FQXi, to distance themselves from Joy Christian instead of any further supporting his pseudoscience.


The fourth FQXi essay contest is underway. There is a lot questionable about FQXi and what it at times supports, but this year’s topic is just so clearly up my alley that I simply cannot resist:


Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?

 

The following, scary pictures are making it around the net at present:



And here separating the fresh water:


I like to explain stuff so that people like you and me think “aha!”, and not, “this guy knows a lot; I better agree though I have no clue what he is talking about”. In this manner, let me again briefly introduce one of those deeply complex and hugely controversial topics that supposedly require big sophisticated words, and then, like I hope you slowly come to expect from me, present the solution in a way that is obvious and that we all could have thought about a long time ago (if the conclusions were not so damn uncomfortable that people simply refuse even if it is presented on a silver platter).