Banner
    4 replies [Last post]
    Bonny Bonobo alias Brat's picture
    Offline
    Joined: Jun 23 2010

    Causes, Effects and Management of ‘Blue Green Algae’ Cyanobacteria and their Harmful Algal Blooms in Australian Recreation and Drinking Water with Two Ballina NSW Case Studies 

    Posted 21st June 2014 on Global MND/ALS Awareness Day in memory of Mum

    Cyanobacteria are one of the Earth’s oldest life forms believed to be responsible for colonising the planet and making it habitable for other life forms by reshaping the biosphere 3.5 billion years ago. Australian cyanobacteria otherwise known as ‘blue-green algae’ can reproduce rapidly in the right conditions to form harmful algal blooms (HABs) often referred to as cyanoHABs. CyanoHABs can take multiple shapes, forms and sizes; they may occur as single cells floating free within the water column or in groups as colonies or as straight, coiled or twisted filaments and form films or ‘mats’ that are clearly visible to the human eye.


    Photo of blue green algae blooms taken from Paerl&Paul 2012

    CyanoHABs are only categorised as harmful if their blooms cause harm to other organisms. This harm may be caused by cyanoHABs blocking another organism’s light source, adversely obstructing or chemically disrupting their environment, outcompeting with them for available nutrients and resources or by producing harmful toxins called cyanotoxins, which can damage the health of other organisms in a variety of ways. The majority of cyanotoxins can be regarded as secondary metabolites that are not utilised by the organism’s primary metabolism and which can be classified into two main groups, those that cause acute lethal poisoning to other organisms which are the neurotoxins and hepatotoxins and those that are not lethal to other organisms but demonstrate selective bioactivity which are the cytotoxins (Whitton and Potts, 2000).

    Cyanobacteria are often referred to as ‘blue-green algae’ however this is a misnomer as they belong to the group of organisms called prokaryotes which includes bacteria but does not include algae which are eukaryotes. Prokaryotes do not possess a true cell nucleus and other membrane bound cell compartments like mitochondria and chloroplasts that are found in the eukaryotes, such as animals, plants, fungi and protists. Cyanobacteria do however possess internal gas vacuoles and these enable them to be highly motile and competitive against less motile zooplankton and phytoplankton competitors especially within the water column where they are able to take advantage of nutrients available in different locations,temperatures and depths at different times. Cyanobacteria are capable of photosynthesis across a broad spectrum of ultra violet light and during adverse environmental conditions they can form dormant states such as thick-walled heterocytes containing the enzyme nitrogenase responsible for nitrogen fixation or cyanobacterial spores and akinetes that may re-emerge in the future under more favourable conditions, this also makes them difficult to eradicateand manage.

    Cyanobacteria can exist in fresh or marine water, soil or dust and also in many extreme temperatures and habitats. They are found in abundance at the Earth’s frozen polar ice caps and even in the hollow shafts of polar bear’s fur as well as in hot volcanic, sulphurous or salt springs and deserts and in polluted and nutrient rich beaches, lakes, rivers, estuaries, reservoirs and waterways and even inside underwater marine geysers. Photo Credit: Steven Pierson

    Cyanobacteria often exist in symbiotic relationships with other life forms such as cycads and fungi and provide valuable food and nutrients for many other organisms but although they are an important part ofthe biosphere and life cycle they can be a serious nuisance and pest when they form harmful blooms or cyanoHABs and release cyanotoxins that bioaccumulate or poison other organisms and habitats.

    The causes of cyanobacterial bloom formation are multifactorial and species specific but they usually include the presence of cells or spores for recruitment, warmer temperatures, high light intensity, low turbidity and stable water and air conditions. When these conditions are present, often but not always in nutrient rich environments known as ‘eutrophication’ cyanobacteria can grow quickly and exponentially to create blooms. Globally, strong correlations have been found between total phosphorous inputs and phytoplankton production in fresh water, and between total nitrogen input and phytoplankton production in estuarine and marine waters. There are also numerous examples of increases in nutrient loading being directly linked with the development of large biomass blooms, leading to anoxia and even toxic or harmful impacts on fisheries resources, ecosystems, and human health through recreational and drinking water.

    The connection between eutrophication and an increase in the occurrence of cyanoHABs is well established. Climate changes such as global warming and corresponding hydrological changes have also been implicated (IPCC, 2007, Briand et al., 2004,Elliott et al., 2005, Paerl and Huisman, 2008, Paul 2008, Paerl etal., 2011; cited by Paerl et al., 2012) see figure 1.

    figure1 Anthropogenic and ClimateChange Causes of CyanoHaBs  (taken fromPaerl&Paul, 2012)

    Anthropogenic activities and climate change can increase the likelihood of cyanoHAB events occurring but the factors that cause cyanoHABs are manifold and not always fully understood and cyanoHABs can also occur naturally. Modern cyanoHABs are often caused by stronger storms and weather events, increased temperatures and water evaporation rates, reduced water availability and flow, longer droughts and water residence times, increased agricultural, industrial, residential and urban pollution and environmental degradation and waterway eutrophication.


    The main sources of nutrients that stimulate algal blooms are sewage, atmospheric deposition, groundwater flow, as well as agricultural and aquaculture runoff. Warming is also a major factor because prokaryotes’ growth rates proliferate at relatively high temperatures (Butterwick et al., 2005 and Watkinson et al., 2005; cited by Paerl&Paul 2012). This also gives CyanoHABs a distinct advantage in nutrient-enriched conditions, when competition with eukaryotic primary producers such as diatoms, chlorophytes, cryptophytes and dinoflagellates is often intense. The growth rates of these eukaryotes usually level off or decline when cyanobacterial growth rates reach their optimum level and then continue to remain high, even when temperatures exceed 25 °C. Surface water warming also intensifies vertical stratification in both freshwater and marine systems and seasonal warming lengthens this period of stratification and cyanoHAB species are able to uniquely exploit these stratified conditions (Paerl&Paul 2012).

    CyanoHABs lower water turbidity in an ecosystem which then restricts light penetration and suppresses the establishment and growth of aquatic macrophytes and benthic microalgae and adversely affects the underwater habitat of benthic flora and fauna (Jeppesen et al., 2007, Scheffer et al.,1997 and Scheffer, 2004; cited by Paerl&Paul 2012). CyanoHAB’s nightime respiration also causes oxygen depletion and bacterial decomposition of dense blooms, which can cause fish kills, and loss of benthic infauna and flora (Paerl, 2004, Watkinson et al., 2005, Garcia andJohnstone, 2006 and Paerl and Fulton, 2006; cited by Paerl&Paul, 2012). Persistent CyanoHABs can lead to long-term loss of benthic habitat (Karlson et al.,2002; cited by Paerl&Paul 2012).

    Finally and probably most importantly, cyanoHABs produce toxic peptides and alkaloids and ingestion of cyanotoxins has been linked to liver, digestive and skin diseases, neurological impairment and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinsons and Motor Neuron Disease (MND) in humans (Holtcamp, 2012, Dunlop etal., 2013) and death (Chorus and Bartram, 1999, Carmichael, 2001 and Humpage,2008; cited by Paerl&Paul, 2012). 


    There are five major groups of cyanotoxins produced by cyanoHABs however 95% of cyanobacteria recently tested (Holtcamp, 2012) have been found to be able to produce the neurotoxinβ-Methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) during blooming and lysis and BMAA has been seriously implicated recently as a potential cause of up to 90% of the neurodegenerative diseases occurring within the ALS-dementia complex (Dunlop et al., 2013). Consequently, toxic CyanoHABs are a major threat to the use of freshwater ecosystems and reservoirs for drinking water, irrigation, and freshwater and marine fishing and recreational purposes (Chorusand Bartram, 1999, Carmichael, 2001, Osborne et al., 2001 and Osborne et al., 2007; cited by Paerl and Paul 2012).

    Case Study 1 - LakeAinsworth

    Lake Ainsworth is an acidic coastal freshwater lowland dune lake in Lennox Head on the far north coast of NSW and it covers an area of 12.4 hectares, it is classified as ‘permanently’ freshwater, although diatom evidence indicates a saline phase that ended in the1930s (Tibby 2007, Anon 2004). It is jointly managed by Ballina Shire Council (BSC) and the Department of Sport and Recreation and considered to be an important recreational water asset by BSC and the local community as it provides a safe, closed body of water less than 100 metres from a surfing beach where sports and recreational activities can be undertaken. It is also a significant tourist attraction and brings income and employment to the area. In recent years the lake has been experiencing regular harmful cyanobacterial blooms primarily during the summer months from September to March and this is a threat to public health and safety (Betts 1999, Anon 2002).


    Figure 2 taken from the BSC Lake Ainsworth Vegetation Study.

    An integrated project report (Jones 1988) of the recreational carrying capacity of Lake Ainsworth with regard to both social and resource capacity identified runoff from the caravan park and surrounding developed areas and alteration of drainage patterns around the lake as potential problems for the future carrying capacity of the lake (Betts 1999, Anon 2002). Jones (1988) also identified beach erosion, leaching from septic tanks and small scale chemical pollutionfrom insect repellant and sun tan lotions and urine from bathers as potential risks to the lake’s water quality in the future however Jones made no mention of cyanobacteria or cyanoHABs occurring at lake Ainsworth and the water quality was described as ‘pleasant’ ‘tea colour’ and of good quality (Jones 1988,pp.8-24). 

    Since then the water quality in Lake Auinsworth has deteriorated significantly and seasonal monitoring has shown that cyanoHABs now occur most years at LakeAinsworth since the early 1990s (Betts 1999, Anon 2002). Several studies have been performed and the main environmental factors that have been identified as potentially contributing towards the cyanoHABs at lake Ainsworth include light and nutrient availability, water temperature and lake mixing processes (Betts 1999, Anon 2002).

    The Ballina Shire Council 2002 Lake Ainsworth Management Report clearly states that ‘better management is needed not only to halt ongoing degradation, but also to rectify past damage,with the overall objective of achieving an integrated, balanced, responsibleand ecologically sustainable use of the area in the future’ (Anon, 2002). To dothis the BSC management report (Anon 2002) recommends ‘the establishment of an integrated catchment management structure for the lake that allows for implementation, monitoring and review of the lake Ainsworth Management Plan’ however no subsequent versions of this management plan appear to have been created and the recommended management structure could not be located. 

    A Lake Ainsworth Monitoring study between 1998-1999 monitored the cyanobacterial environmental conditions and their growth and physiological characteristics and identified the lake stratification in summer months, dune erosion, increased nutrients and faecal contamination as major causes of the prolonged cyanoHABannual events (Betts, 1999). Betts (1999) also assessed the effectiveness of a 1997 installation of an aerator to improve lake water circulation and decrease stratification and found that it was having some effect (Betts 1999) butcyanoHABs were still occurring for most years (Anon, 2002). BSC recommendedmore research following a processes study by Australian Water and CoastalStudies in August 1996 (Betts 1999) and at that time the BSC was following the processes outlined in the Estuary Management Manual and the subsequent formation of the lake Ainsworth Estuary Management Committee (Betts 1999).

              Figure 3                 Figure 4                 Figure5

    The main groups that are affected by cyanoHABs at Lake Ainsworth are the sports and recreational users of the lake (Anon 2002). This includes tourists, adjacent caravaners, school children at the sports and recreation camp, local bathers, swimmers, fishers, canoeists, catamaran sailors and kayakers who are all advised by BSC signage not to enter the toxic water during prolonged cyanoHAB events mostly during peak summer vacation periods (Betts 1999, Anon 2002).

    Although the BSC signs warn of health dangers (see figure 3) there are no fines applying for ignoring this advice and many people and children still enter the water at considerable personal risk, see figures 4 and 5 (Betts 1999, Anon 2002). It has been found recently that over 90% of cyanobacteria and CyanoHABs release the neurotoxin BMAA while they are blooming and dying (Holtcamp, 2012) and that this toxin has been seriously implicated in causing long term neurodegenerative diseases by bioaccumulating in seafood, animals and people and potentially causing the misfolding of important proteins required for healthy neurological functioning (Dunlop et al., 2013). Local authorities say that they have never tested and are currently still not testing Lake Ainsworth’s recreational water for the presence of the neurotoxin Beta-Methylamino-L-alanine or BMAA(BSC, 2014). Lake Ainsworth sports and recreational users who have ignored BSC signage may therefore subsequently develop serious neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinsons and Motor Neuron Disease and/or liver diseases and cancer, months or years after accidentally ingesting the invisible BMAA cyanotoxins in the lake water (Holtcamp, 2012). 

    CaseStudy 2 – Emigrant Creek Dam

    At the time of writing this (May 2014) Emigrant Creek Dam has a blue green algae red alert in place from the Northern Rivers Regional Algae Coordinating Committee (NSW RACC 2014). Emigrant Creek Dam (ECD) is a secondary source of potable and drinking water supplied by Rous Water (Akhurst, 2013) that is located close to Ballina (see figure 2). ECD has a surface areaof 0.5 km2, a maximumdepth of 9.5 m and a storage capacity of 820 ML (Akhurst, 2013).

    Emigrant Creek Dam was built in 1968 and supplies drinking water to the local authority areas of Ballina and Lennox Head (see figure 5) and is an important part of the Rous Water supply Network (Akhurst, 2013). The catchment area for Emigrant Creek Dam contains pasture, macadamia plantations, native bush land, orchards, rural residential and cropping (SKM,2004; cited by Akhurst,2013). The surface water quality in the ECD has deteriorated significantly over recent years (Egis, 2001; SKM, 2004; cited by Akhurst, 2013) and the eutrophic ECD reservoir receives high quantities of nutrient rich water from Emigrant Creek arising from these agricultural holdings. In addition, many small tributaries, land-disposed dredged sediment, a stockpile of harvested aquatic macrophytes on the north-western shoreline and a disused cattle dip site all provide point sources that pollute the water quality andupset the biodiversity of the Emigrant Creek Dam (Akhurst, 2013).

    Figure6 © Rous County Council 2011.

    Frequent blooms of nuisance cyanobacteria, high exotic aquatic macrophytes biomasses, low dissolved oxygen and elevated concentrations of nutrients and trace metals, including Al, Cu, Fe and Mn originating from seasonal internal elemental ECD recycling of sediments, are all major problems at Emigrant Creek Dam and are making management and treatment of the drinking water difficult (Egis, 2001; Akhurst,2013). Nutrient and trace metal loads in ECD sediments and the overlying water column are directly linked to reservoir eutrophication and a proliferation of potentially toxic cyanobacteria and their cyanoHABs  (Akhurst et al., 2004;cited by Akhurst, 2013). High accumulations of trace metals and/or nutrients may result in serious ecological degradations (Saygi and Yiğit, 2012; cited by Akhurst, 2013).

    Clean drinking water resources are vital for modern societies; however the presence of potential pollutants and cyanoHABs in the ECD reservoir are a potential health risk not only for aquatic environment degradation but also for human health (Akhurst, 2013). A drinking water quality risk assessment (Egis,2001; cited by Akhurst, 2013) and a water monitoring program in Emigrant Creek(SKM, 2004; cited by Akhurst, 2013) and an aquatic and terrestrial biota survey (EEP, 2003; cited by Akhurst, 2013) were all performed for the ECD; however no reservoir-wide assessments of the ecological risks associated with sediment accumulated elements have been made (Akhurst, 2013).  There are also apparently no tests being performed by Rous Water or the NGO’s that they employ for the presence of the cyanotoxin BMAA in the ECD water, which can still remain after cyanobacteria blooms have been removed by activated carbon and ozone treatments (Rous Water, 2014; Richmond QLD Forensic Department, 2014; House et al., 2010).

    Policies

    Information and advice regarding the existence and management of cyanoHABs in Australian recreation and drinking water is potentially available to the public and to those who are responsible for managing the problem from a variety of global, national, state and local governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) ranging from international, national and state government departments, catchment authorities and NGOs to local government, councils and the NGOs that they employ (Verhoeven, 2014). However, the names and hierarchical structure of these organizations and the advice and information that they provide are constantly being revised and changed, as is the latest scientific research and advice, so it is difficult to outline clearly who is responsible for managing cyanoHABs in recreation and drinking water at any one point in time. Links and references to and from relevant advisory sites and documents are also constantly changing with each successive government departmental restructure, merge or change in hierarchy and those references and links are often not being maintained.

    Examples of global organizations that research and provide global advice on managing cyanoHABs in recreational and drinking water include UNESCO, WHO, GWRA and the EPA (Newcombe et al., 2009). The Australian national organization that primarily researches and provides national advice on managing cyanobacteria and cyanoHABs in recreational and drinking water is Water Quality Research Australia (WQRA formerly WATERRA), which is based in South Australia (Newcombe et al., 2009). Ultimately the responsibility for cyanoHABs occurring in recreational water and drinking water and the consequences of potential mismanagement seems to lie primarily with local governments, catchment authorities and county councils and the water utilities and consultants that they employ, who rely upon various global, national, state and local governmental and NGO water organizations and experts to supply them with safe recreational and drinking water advice and guidelines regarding cyanobacterial and cyanoHAB management, treatment and monitoring services.


    The local authorities ability to manage cyanoHABs in their recreational and drinking water is primarily self reported and self-audited although each of the Australian states and territories do have their own hierarchical infrastructure of governmental departments and authorities and NGOs responsible for monitoring the local and regional management of cyanobacteria and cyanoHABs. For example in NSW the Government Department of Primary Industry oversees and manages various regional algal coordinating committees, catchment authorities and councils that in turn research and monitor cyanoHAB events and are responsible for reporting these cyanoHAB events and their level of harm often as a colour coded level of alert in recreational and drinking water to the public, state and national authorities (NSW RACC 2014).

    The National Water Commission (NWC) that was responsible for auditing the state of Australian recreational and drinking water quality was recently abolished by the current Australian federal government as part of its financial ‘budget’ and cost saving policies, saving $20.9 million (Murray, 2014). The NWC was an independent statutory authority established by the National Water Commission Act 2004 to provide advice to the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) and to the Australian Federal Government on national water issues (National WaterCommission (NWC), 2011). It was responsible for providing independent assurance of governments' progress on water reform and promoting the objectives and outcomes of the National Water Initiative, which was an agreement signed by all governments in Australia (NWC, 2011). Since a COAG review in 2012 and the amendment of the Nation Water Commission Act the NWC was responsible for monitoring, auditing and assessing the state of the Nation’s water resources and their management and was empowered to perform broader activities to promote national water reform objectives (National Water Commission, 2013). The NWC also had additional functions under other Commonwealth acts and regulations, for example the Water Act 2007 authorised the NWC to audit the effectiveness of the implementation of the Murray–Darling Basin Plan and associated water resource plans (NWC, 2011). In 2011, the NWC was also delegated additional functions under the Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Regulations 2011 (NWC, 2013).

    Diffuse source water is a major contributor to nutrient pollution, eutrophication and cyanoHAB events in Australian waterways (NSW DSWP, 2011). The NSW Diffuse Source Water Pollution Strategy (NSW DSWP, 2011) has provided, for the first time, a management framework for coordinating efforts to reduce diffuse source water pollution across NSW. It is a joint initiative by the State's natural resource managers at State, regional and local government levels that promotes partnerships and provides a means to share information on projects and their outcomes across the State (NSW DSWP, 2011). The main aim of the Strategy was toreduce diffuse source water pollution inputs into all NSW surface and groundwater and to contribute towards the community agreed NSW water qualityobjectives and state-wide natural resource management targets to progress towards Goal 22 (Protect our natural environment) of ‘NSW 2021 -A plan to make NSW number one’ (NSW DSWP, 2011).

    The first and also the last NSW Diffuse Source Water Pollution Strategy Annual Report was published in November 2010 and reported on the implementation of the individual actions identified it the Priority Action Plan. It claimed that very few projects had been delayed in their implementation and completion and a range of new initiatives and that projects had been identified that will continue to build on the substantial achievements to date (NSW DSWP, 2011). 

    Conclusion

    The case studies in this paper have shown how in just one small northern NSW Australian town such as Ballina, cyanobacteria and dangerous cyanoHABs are occurring regularly in public lakes and reservoirs and their management is proving to be very challenging to local, state and federal authorities and to the NGOs that they employ. Known cyanotoxins from cyanoHABs such as BMAA that have recently been shown to be potentially causing up to 90% of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinsons and Motor Neuron disease are occurring in our local recreational and drinking water supplies and yet the presence of BMAA is reportedly not being tested for by the relevant authorities. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) does not have health statistics to show how many people are dying from these neurodegenerative diseases in specific locations potentially because of their exposure to cyanoHABs and cyanotoxins such as BMAA in their recreational and drinking water supplies. More research is needed and better monitoring and auditing of recreational and drinking water cyanoHABs. The abolishment of the National Water Commission by the Australian federal government this year may well prove to have been a false economy for the Australian public.

    The evidence in this paper supports Dr Paul Cox and his colleagues recommendations that people and governments should take the threat of BMAA neurotoxins and other cyanotoxins from cyanobacteria and cyanoHABs in our recreational and drinking water supplies much more seriously (Holtcamp, 2012). Federal, state and local governments, catchment authorities, the public and NGO water managers and consumers need to take a closer look at cyanobacterial blooms and the environmental and health effects of cyanoHABs in our recreational and drinking water that may be bioaccumulating in our water and food supply and ultimately in us (Holtcamp, 2012).

    Australia needs to have a vigorous public discourse as to how we manage our land and water and scientists and academics, funded from the public purse, have an obligation to contribute to this discourse. All Australians must become more water literate in order to understand the impact they have on our water resources” (Cullen, 2011).

    References

    Akhurst, D. J. (2013). Sediment geochemistry and short-termbiomanipulations in Emigrant Creek Dam, New South Wales, Australia.

    Anon.(2002) Lake Ainsworth management plan. Ballina (NSW), Department of PublicWorks and Services, Geolink, Ballina Shire Council, NSW, Australia.  http://www.ballina.nsw.gov.au/cp_content/resources/12_30443__Lake_Ainsworth_Management_Plan.pdf(Viewed May 2014)

    Anon.(2004) Unsolved mystery: clues wanted on Lake Ainsworth’s salty past. NorthCoast Advocate 22 Jan 2004: 1–2.

    Betts, J. (1999). Lake Ainsworth monitoring study : final report. Ballina Shire Council. NSW Department of Public Works and Services, Geolink.

    Cullen, P.,&Cullen, V. (2011). This Land, Our Water: Water Challenges for the 21st Century. ATF. http://www.nrc.nsw.gov.au/content/documents/Speaking%20notes%20-%20This%20Land%20Our%20Water.pdf  (viewed May 2014).

    Dunlop, R.A., Cox, P.A., Banack, S.A., Rodgers,J.K. (2013). "The Non-Protein Amino Acid BMAA Is Misincorporated into Human Proteins in Place of l-Serine Causing Protein Misfolding andAggregation". PLOS One 8 (9). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075376.

    Holtcamp, W. (2012). The emerging science ofBMAA: do cyanobacteria contribute to neurodegenerative disease?. Environmentalhealth perspectives,120(3), a110.

    House, J., Ho, L., Baker, P.,&Burch, M.(2010). Management strategies for cyanobacteria (blue-green algae): A guide for water utilities.WQRA Research report 74 [www document]. http://www.awa.asn.au/uploadedfiles/Content/Training_and_Development/Online_Training/Leaks,Smells%20and%20Corrosion/Management_Stratetgies_for_Cyanobacteria_Guide_for_Water_Utilities.pdf(Viewed May 2014)

    Murray D. (2014) ‘What does the first Abbott government budget mean for our environment?’ Australian Conservation Society[web address] http://www.acfonline.org.au/news-media/acf-opinion/what-does-first-abbott-government-budget-mean-our-environment

    Newcombe G., House J., Ho L., Baker P. andBurch M. (2009) Management Strategies for Cyanobacteria (BlueGreenAlgae) and their Toxins: A Guide for Water Utilities. WQRA research report 74. http://www.wqra.com.au/WQRA_publications.htm (ViewedMay 2014)

    Newcombe G., (2011) International GuidanceManual for the Management of Toxic Cyanobacteria (SA Water Corporation, WaterQuality research Australia WATERRA&Global water Research Coalition GWRC).ISBN 978–90–77622–21–6 http://www.waterra.com.au/cyanobacteria-manual/PDF/GWRCGuidanceManualLevel1.pdf(Viewed May 2014)

    National Water Commission NWC. (2011) TheNational Water Initiative-securing Australia‟ s water future: 2011 assessment. Canberra,NWC.

    National Water Commission. (2013). The NationalWater Commission Role and Functions. Canberra, NWC. http://www.nwc.gov.au/organisation/role(Viewed May 2014).

    NSW DSWP Government Department of Environmentand Heritage (DEH) (2011) NSW Diffuse Source Water Pollution (DSWP) Strategy http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/water/dswp.htm(Viewed May 2014)

    NSW RACC (2104) Department of PrimaryIndustries Regional Algal Coordinating Committee Contacts http://www.water.nsw.gov.au/Water-management/Water-quality/Algal-information/Algal-contacts/Algal-contacts(Viewed May 2014)

    Paerl, H. W., &Paul, V. J. (2012). Climate change: links to global expansion of harmfulcyanobacteria. Water research, 46(5), 1349-1363.

    Rous Water Management Plan (Anon 2014) URL www.rouswater.nsw.gov.au (ViewedMay 2014)

    Tibby, J., Lane, M. B.,&Gell, P. A.(2007). Local knowledge and environmental management: a cautionary tale from Lake Ainsworth, New South Wales, Australia. Environmental Conservation, 34(04),334-341.

    Verhoeven, TJ. New South Wales Algal Management Strategy : Integrating the Professions and Community [online]. In: WaterDown Under 94: Groundwater/Surface Hydrology Common Interest Papers; Preprints of Papers. Barton, ACT: Institution of Engineers, Australia, 1994: 73-77.National conference publication (Institution of Engineers, Australia) ; no.94/10.Availability: <http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=747610112540262;res=IELENG>ISBN:085825607X. (Viewed May 2014)

    Whitton, B. A.,&Potts, M. (Eds.).(2000). The ecology of cyanobacteria: their diversity in time and space. Springer.

    My 5 min film 'Hidden Dangers for ALS' entry in the AAN #2015Neurofilm Festival is listed no. 21 of 65 entries at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYNSC2T2aPD7GH6pVWI7I6DjzwbbBKCWK

    Comments

    Anonymous
    Anonymous's picture

    Hi Helen
    This is an important paper. There has been no action on major management plan actions. Has BSC received a copy? I have been pushing council for years now. Are you aware of connection between bass added to lake for fishing and increases in BG Algae? Some work was done in a S Queensland lake? There could be a link to LA problems as bass has evidently been added for fishing.
    Malcolm Milner

    Bonny Bonobo alias Brat's picture
    Offline
    Joined: Jun 23 2010
    No Malcolm, I wasn't aware of the connection between bass being added to lakes for fishing and increases in blue green algae, I will investigate that further. There are definitely fish in Emigrant Creek and Dam and I think there are also bass, I will check that too.

    Only yesterday I was amazed to read that in NSW Australia RACC water authorities are now claiming that they are not required to make public announcements or provide data to the public about blue green algae present in any water storages such as dams or reservoirs where there is no public access, which I didn't know before. It may be a new thing or it may not, I am currently investigating that too. The RACC website now says :-
    Algal alerts are issued by Regional Algal Coordinating Committees (RACCs) who are responsible for local management of algal blooms.

    'The summary report below provides the most recent algal data collated by the RACCs from across NSW. Algal blooms may be present and not reported to the RACCs. Locations identified below were experiencing algal blooms at the date of the report. This report does not contain data from water storages managed by water supply authorities where there is no public access.'

    Emigrant Creek Dam is a potable drinking water source for the Ballina area where my mother lived and died of MND/ALS and my father still lives there and also provides drinking water for the Lennox Head area and last year there was a red alert for toxic blue green algae blooms for several months for both the Emigrant Creek Dam and for the Emigrant Creek which overflows from the Dam and which does have public access, this is historically a regular occurence. 



    Emigrant Creek eventually flows out into the Richmond River in Ballina 100 metres from where my mother lived when she contracted MND/ALS. This year there could be a red alert for blue green algae in Emigrant Creek Dam and I would have no way of knowing and neither would the public who are potentially drinking, fishing and bathing in the treated and untreated water or inhaling spores in spray from the Emigrant Creekand/or Dam and the output flow into Richmond River. 

    There is currently a red alert for toxic blue green algae at Casino Boat Ramp which is on a part of the Richmond River further inland that also eventually flows past 100 metres from my parents and many other people's houses in Ballina.


    I recently complained to Byronshire Council BSC that by their own admission they are not testing the local waterways or Byron Bay beaches for toxic algae unless the public complain and even when I complained and sent them pictures of algal scum on the beaches and pollution in the Belongil Creek they told me this had been tested in the past years ago and was found not to be toxic blue green algae therefore there was no need to retest it now. 


    This is an unscientific approach to the problem because noone can tell just by looking at algal scum or pollution whether it is toxic or not and just because it may not have been toxic in the past, years ago, it does not mean that it is not toxic now. There needs to be regular testing of our waterways and beaches especially places where the public swim and fish. Cyanobacteria can produce harmful toxins at different times under different conditions and can also be benign at other times. This is the reply to my complaint to Byronshire Council that was recently sent to me :-
    'Council acknowledges your recent inquiry about blue-green algae (BGA) (actually known as cyanobacteria) and natural waters in Byron Shire. Dr. Lee Bowling of the NSW Office of Water provided the following information in relation to the technical questions about links between BGA and human health.

    “At this time the link between blue-green algae and motor neuron disease (and other neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinsonism) has been postulate for several years. The hypothesis is under investigation by several research groups in various parts of the world, including in Sydney by a joint venture comprising the University of Technology (UTS), Sydney University and Macquarie University. This group includes Dr. Rachael Dunlop, who wrote the internet article that you refer to in recent discussion.

    As yet, the link between BGA and motor neuron disease is still in the hypothesis stage, although ongoing research is starting to fill in some of the gaps. For example, the work by the UTS team has shown a mode of action as to how β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) can lead to the disruption of motor neuron cells. Like much scientific research, linking cause and effect is likely to be long and difficult.

    The hypothesis is that a neurotoxin, BMAA, is produced by blue-green algae and can accumulate up the food-web and end up in people, causing neurodegenerative illness. High concentrations of BMAA have been found in the brain tissues of persons deceased from Alzheimer’s disease, for example.

    It has also been postulated that BMAA produced by BGA enters the aquatic food web and accumulated in top order carnivores such as dolphins, which eat crabs and other seafood. The proposed linkage between BGA and the indigenous people on Guam that Dr. Rachael Dunlop talks about in her internet article is also part of the hypothesis under investigation.

    The cause and effect is currently still hypothesis, with no conclusive evidence as yet.

    However there is circumstantial evidence and research is slowly filling in the gaps. The NSW Office of Water is currently involved with the UTS/Macquarie University group in a research grant proposal put up to the Commonwealth government. Other university researchers are looking at the potential medical implications of BMAA. The Office of Water wants to find out if BMAA is produced by cyanobacterial blooms in NSW, and how common it might be in the environment. This is basic information that local government do not know enough about.

    One of the problems is that BMAA has been very difficult to analyse for, with very few laboratories worldwide capable of doing so. UTS are in the process of considering a proposal to establish a laboratory to analyse for BMAA, which if they can get the funding and can do so, will be a first for Australia.

    The causes of neurodegenerative disease are not known. It appears that genetic causes may result in only 10% of the incidences of motor neuron disease. Environmental triggers such as BMAA may be just one cause, but there are likely to be more than just BMAA and blue-green algae, if these are eventually shown to be an actual cause.

    The Office of Water takes a precautionary approach to BMAA possibly being produced by cyanobacteria and posing a long-term health risk to the public. While we don't know if BMAA produced by cyanobacteria is an actual cause of neurodegenerative disease here in NSW, it is best to be safe rather than to ignore it and find out later that we were wrong.

    However, the potential risk from BMAA produced by cyanobacterial blooms should be already covered if adequate bloom management for other better known public health risks associated with cyanobacteria are being managed when blooms occur.“

    Byron Shire Council relies heavily upon our specialist State Office of Water representatives to advise and provide the best risk management practises to protect the natural environment and human health. As you can appreciate from the information provided above by Dr. Lee Bowling, it is not possible to analyse for BMAA yet. Byron Shire Council adheres to the NSW BGA Management Protocols (revised April 2014) which are in place to protect community health.

    At this time Council is not aware of any BGA blooms in the Belongil Creek or in the marine waters associated with our coastal beaches. The risks relating to BGA are accordingly considered to be very low, and no monitoring actions are considered necessary until a bloom is reported and confirmed by laboratory analysis.

    As also discussed with you on the telephone, the presence of surface scum and foam on beaches and at the water’s edge, especially after strong storm or wave action, are not related to BGA blooms. The past analysis of such materials reveals that diatoms, non-toxic marine algae and seaweed are the major ingredients of the foam and debris washed up on the beaches. Harmful BGA cells have not been found with such material floating in the wave zone, or on the sandy beaches.

    Any further inquiries can be directed to Environmental Services by telephoning (02) 6626 7040 during normal office hours, or by e-mail to council@byron.nsw.gov.au.'

    BMAA from toxic blue green algae may not have been conclusively proven yet to cause MND and ALS but without a doubt cyanobacteria and blue green algae produce a variety of cyanotoxins that are known and have been scientifically proven to be very harmful to people and animals in both the short and long term. Microcystins are a proven cause of human liver cancer and death!

    This Western Australia government Department of Health website publishes this information about the harmful effects of cyanotoxins from blue green algae blooms caused by cyanobacteria in our fresh and marine waters originally published by the World Health Organisation in 1999 so this is not recent knowledge by any stretch of the imagination.
    My 5 min film 'Hidden Dangers for ALS' entry in the AAN #2015Neurofilm Festival is listed no. 21 of 65 entries at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYNSC2T2aPD7GH6pVWI7I6DjzwbbBKCWK
    Anonymous
    Anonymous's picture

    Thanks for your comprehensive reply Helen. Ballina Shire Council are trying to close the eastern road at L Ainsworth currently and also construct better storm water drainage. There seems to be resistance from the managers of the adjacent crown lands. I put together the following thoughts on behalf of the LH Residents Association regarding the management of the lake. Copies will go to all councillors. I have been trying to get action on the management plan for probably 10 years now.

    Management of Lake Ainsworth

    Lake Ainsworth is an acidic coastal lowland dune lake with water entering from direct rainfall and through a small catchment area. Water leaves largely by evaporation with a small seepage through the dunes. It is extremely sensitive to nutrient and sediment contamination. The 2002 Coastal Lakes Inquiry rated Lake Ainsworth in the lowest of all their categories. Little action has been implemented to remedy the weaknesses identified even though a Management Plan was prepared in 2002.

    The ongoing health of the lake is a primary concern to many locals. Current standards for stormwater management are being ignored and as a consequence many poor quality pathogen test results are occurring. Additionally because of the close proximity of busy bitumen roads within both the Council and Sport and Recreation managed lands, sediment materials containing heavy metals will also be directly entering the body of the lake and steadily accumulating. There is currently no monitoring of this. Unfiltered drainage from the Caravan Park to the south also enters the lake riparian zone from four separate drains.

    Since the early 1990’s the lake has also experienced regular algal blooms that result in the lake being closed to users. A trial aerator was installed in the late 1990’s to decrease stratification, and this has subsequently been updated, but its use has not been entirely successful in eliminating blooms of cyanobacteria.

    Stormwater Management

    At the present time there is no water quality improvement infrastructure in place to manage inflows from Council managed areas, the Caravan Park site or from the extensive bitumen surfaces within the Sport and Recreation property. In fact the S and R site directly releases stormwater by concrete drain from a large bitumen area directly into the lake. Council drainage does run over narrow strips of closely mown lawn but these do little to slow flow or absorb contaminants.

    Recently the lake has recorded poor faecal coliform measurements. Control of such contamination is made challenging because of an off lead dog area immediately to the east of the lake and a large duck population in the south west corner attracted by the caravan park residents who feed them. Without any workable riparian zone, contamination readily reaches the lake. The Council position is that users should not use the lake during rain events or for three days after although this is not clearly communicated by signage. In 2014, using local rainfall figure, this would have resulted in the lake being usable for primary contact recreation for only 28% of the time. This figure becomes even less when days lost due to cyanobacterial blooms are added. No swimming at all would have been possible in January 2014 during the busy holiday period. For the swimming period from 1 October 2013 to 30 April 2014 the period for safe swimming was reduced to 23% of the time.

    It is interesting that Council has a Stormwater Management Policy that, if implemented for all drainage around the lake, would go some way to addressing the water quality issues. There appears to be no planning in place to achieve ANZECC water quality guidelines for primary contact recreational water bodies by any of the agencies managing land in the precinct.

    Current plans by Ballina Shire Council to close the eastern road and reduce traffic on the southern road offer the only chance that adequate stormwater treatment can be achieved in at least part of the catchment of the lake.

    Blue Green Algal Bloom Management

    Residents concerns relating to the commencement of regular algal blooms were reported to council in the early 1990’s and it seems they were not an issue earlier.
    Algal blooms are initiated by a combination of warmer water, nutrient levels and stratification of water in the deeper parts of the lake. Subsequently an aerator was installed to interrupt stratification thereby reducing phosphorus leaching from the sediment and hopefully restricting algal growth rates. This has not completely reduced outbreaks and the lake is regularly closed for periods of time.

    There are at least two possible reasons for this. One is that the aerator only lies along one the two troughs in the lake and may not be inducing enough water movement to break the stratification in the adjoining trough so in affect it is only addressing half the problem.

    The other is that there is a recently growing body of evidence that if the fauna balance of the lake has been impacted by the introduction of species foreign to the local environment then small algal grazing species could be impacted thereby causing the algae population to explode. The introduction of bass has been identified elsewhere as a cause of fauna imbalance and this species has been introduced into Lake Ainsworth in the recent past by recreational fishers. There have been other fish species introduced as well including Gambusia holbrooki and various aquarium discards such as the Green Swordtail. The growing evidence of a relationship in the fauna balance and algal outbreaks should be investigated. Notwithstanding the potential impact on algal outbreaks, the imbalance should be investigated and action taken to prevent other impacts on the natural balance of the lake. The very recent introduction of Redclaw Crayfish will also impact on indigenous crayfish and experts seem very concerned.

    Even more concerning is some recent research that seems to show that the breakdown products of the cyanobacteria could contribute to neurological problems such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinsons disease.

    User Amenity

    The surrounds of the lake available for recreational use are badly degraded with traffic hardened, poorly grassed surfaces. On the eastern side erosion caused by users has reduced the grassed areas to extremely narrow strips that wear quickly due to the concentrated pedestrian traffic. In some instances lake users enter and exit the water directly onto the bitumen road in the face of passing traffic.

    The southern grassed sections are also eroding rapidly and the lake edge is consequently approaching the bitumen here as well. Around the BBQ area a targeted program with special funding managed to re-establish a grass covering but this will require ongoing attention to counter high activity levels.

    Previous traffic studies have also shown the eastern road to be a high risk area with lake users crossing between picnic tables and cars to the lake and leaving the lake directly into oncoming traffic. A similar situation exists on the southern road with caravan park users crossing randomly though passing traffic over the length of the road.

    The extremely narrow and worn grassed strips around the lake are not only completely inefficient as stormwater buffers but inadequate and unattractive for the recreational user.

    Summary

    There are many issues threatening the ongoing viability of the lake as a recreational resource for primary contact recreational pursuits and recent analytical results are an indication that urgent steps need to be taken to address issues that should be clearly evident to the three managers of the lake precinct. The lake is not only an important recreational place for locals but critical for the ongoing successful operation of the Caravan Park, the Sport and Recreation facility and the financial viability of many local businesses.

    All three agencies must work together to ensure the viability of the lake. The sad story of Parramatta Lake, which has flowing water, recently reopened after being forced to close for some 40 years for similar issues should provide some initiative to work together to produce an action plan that ensures the viability of Lake Ainsworth.

    There are state issued guidelines for riparian corridors on waterfront land. These would not allow roads within 40 m of the lake if they were being constructed today. We should take these as a target and aim to achieve the closest we can get to these objectives given the current constraints. Closing the eastern road and using the south road as a car park would go some way toward achieving such goals.

    In the past we seem to have only bickering between the responsible agencies over issues unrelated to lake health or user safety and no reference to the appropriate science that needs to be applied. The road network is of little value if the lake ceases to be an attraction due to poor water quality.

    Mm 5.2.15
    Malcolm

    Anonymous
    Anonymous's picture

    hello. Is there any possibility to neitrolize Cyanotoxins, if yes, what are they ways of doing it?

    Post new comment

    • Allowed HTML tags: <span> <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

    More information about formatting options

    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.