Banner
    Global Cooling : How Wrong Can You Get?
    By Patrick Lockerby | January 15th 2010 11:37 AM | 9 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Patrick

    Retired engineer, 60+ years young. Computer builder and programmer. Linguist specialising in language acquisition and computational linguistics....

    View Patrick's Profile
    Global Cooling : How Wrong Can You Get?

    Despite media reports to the contrary, the Antarctic ice is still melting, as noted here:
    Climate change is warming the Amundsen Sea, which is at the southern margin of the Pacific Ocean. As rising sea levels push the warm water beneath the ice shelves, it melts them from below, pushing the grounding line higher up the continental shelf.
    That statement, from a recent New Scientist article is generally true: it is true of the majority of ice shelves. In the case of one specific site on the relatively small Fimbul ice shelf, the water appears not to be warm enough to increase the existing melt rate.

    In a recent article: Global Cooling: A Good Story, If Only It Were True, I showed how the Daily Mail had got the facts wrong in two stories. On January 12th, 2010, they did it again. "Now tests show the ice ISN'T melting: Sea water under shelf in the East Antarctic is still freezing", states the Daily Mail headline.

    That headline is just plain wrong, as is the article.  The accompanying stock photo is mis-captioned as well. The photo, captioned "Tests: The Fimbul ice shelf, where scientists conducted experiments on the temperature of water there" is a photo, not of an ice shelf, but of an iceberg!

    The terms 'sea water' and 'still freezing' are misleading. In the public mind, 'sea water' is water in, or directly connected to the sea, or the remaining water from recent seawater floods. The term 'freezing', generally applied, means 'below the freezing point of water'. Applied to water, it means 'in process of becoming ice'.

    The report which the Daily Mail has mis-represented demonstrates that the water under, specifically, the Fimbul ice shelf and no other ice shelves, is not subject to penetration by warm ocean water, which suggests that melting under the Fimbul ice shelf does not increase.

    The report does not say that melting does not occur - it says that melting does not increase.

    The data gathering cited by the Daily Mail, ( with no link to the original publication ), refers to temperatures above the freezing point of sea water and refer to trapped water isolated from the ocean. It says nothing whatsoever about the general upwards trend of sea water temperatures around Antarctica.

    Here are the points of interest which the Daily Mail appears to have mis-read:
    The relatively warm deep water found over the continental slope does not seem to penetrate into the cavity beneath the ice shelf.
    ...
    We observed a roughly 50 meter deep layer of water with temperatures very close to the freezing point, about -2.05 degrees, just beneath the ice shelf.
    ...
    We collected three profiles from the underside of the ice to the seabed at 653 meters below sealevel. No trace of the relatively warm deep water that upwells over the continental slope was found. It will be exciting to see if this is the situation all year round, says Ole Anders Nøst.
    Models of the ocean circulation in the area show warm deep water flowing in under the ice shelves. As this is not observed, the models are most likely wrong and should be improved. This is an important step towards an understanding of the processes under the Fimbul Ice Shelf.
    Source:
    http://fimbul.npolar.no/en/news/archive/2009/Nye_data.html

    The point about non-penetration of warm water to the cavity being surveyed needs to be emphasised.
    Warm Deep Water does not have direct access to the ice shelf cavity, while relatively cold coastal waters shallower than 500 m will interact closely with the Fimbul ice shelf.
    Source:
    http://oceanography.npolar.no/export/sites/default/oceanography/Files/No...


    Antarctic Warming.

    The fact of a generally upwards warming trend in the Antarctic cannot seriously be disputed by the media.
    Press Release - First comprehensive review of the state of Antarctica's climate - Antarctic Climate Change and the Environment - 01 Dec 2009
    Based on the latest evidence* from 100 world-leading scientists from 13 countries, the review focuses on the impact and consequences of rapid warming of the Antarctic Peninsula and the Southern Ocean; rapid ice loss in parts of Antarctica and the increase in sea ice around the continent
    Source:
    http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/press/press_releases/press_release.php?id=1065

    Record-tying High Global Surface Temperature in September 2009

    The monthly anomaly of the global average surface temperature in September 2009 (i.e. the average of the near-surface air temperature over land and the SST) was +0.37oC (prliminary value) (based on the 1971-2000 average) which tied with 2005 as the highest record since 1891 ...
    Source:
    http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/tcc/tcc/news/press_20091009.pdf

    There was also a record-tying average of temperatures from January to November 2009:
    The annual anomaly of the global average surface temperature in 2009 (i.e. the average of the near-surface air temperature over land and the sea surface temperature) was +0.31oC above normal (based on the 1971-2000 average) which tied with 2006, 2003 and 2002 as the third highest record since 1891 ...
    Source:
    http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/tcc/tcc/news/press_20091215.pdf

    Why Is This Important?

    Some people will not become convinced that global warming is real until they need scuba-diving gear to visit their own shoreside properties.  Beyond reasonable doubt, the world's sea levels are rising.  I remarked in a recent (10th Jan 2010) comment on this site that the 1953 flood, previously regarded as a 1000 year event has become a 100 year event. A newly-published report supports that view.

    Radical sea defence rethink urged
    Rising sea levels and more storms could mean that parts of at-risk cities will need to be surrendered to protect homes and businesses, a report warns.
    Source: BBC
    Original report:
    http://www.buildingfutures.org.uk/assets/downloads/Facing_Up_To_Rising_S...



    Further reading and references:
    http://oceanography.npolar.no/oceanography/research/iceshelves.html
    http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/indexe.html
    WMO Greenhouse Gas Bulletin
    http://gaw.kishou.go.jp/wdcgg/products/bulletin.html
    http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/met/SCAR_ssg_ps/ACCE.htm
    http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/bas_research/science/climate/position-statem...

    More on climate from the chatter_box
    Global Cooling: A Good Story, If Only It Were True.
    Global Cooling : Beyond Parochialism
    Join The Navy : See A Nuke
    Himalayan Hype : Reading Between The Lines
    GMST : Discovering Trends
    How To Model A Smoking Gun

    Comments

    If you have been watching ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, or MSNBC you don’t know anything about this because like ACORN they have not broadcast a single story about it, even though it was confirmed in the New York Times.Yes you would have to watch FOX NEWS to hear about this because it does not meet official White House propaganda standards.I'd say that yes it is damaging because it creates unrealistic expectations in the minds of lay people and false beliefs. Misreported science is everywhere and it's often the only science most people see because it's reported in the media they engage with, the tabloid newspapers and tv "news" shows. If someone reports that my study on nutritional supplements for dementia showed a significant improvement in their cognition (when this is SO not the case) and people start using the supplements hoping for an effect, not only are they being financially disadvantaged, but they may also be ignoring other things that do help because the media has created a belief in a particular product or practice.

    I'm confused. Are you saying Fox news is a proponent of Global warming, or that fox news pointed out how wrong the daily mail was when they said ice was increasing?

    I watch fox and they seem to push the denialist stance that it has been cooling despite measurements to the contrary. They claim Antarctica is growing and that all global warming scientists for the past 30 years have been lying for lucrative government grants despite being the lowest funded science in America.

    And quick question did fox tell you the acorn tapes were over dubbed? did fox report on the rape and imprisonment of the woman raped and cover up by her employer KBR?

    It is far more likely that everyone else is telling the truth and you have one liar.. than everyone else is lying to you and the fair and ballacned fox news that justed hired sarah palin to balance out it;s massive liberal voice.. is the one telling you the truth.

    97% of all climate scientists agree that man is increasing the temperature of the earth and you will never hear that on Fox news.

    logicman
    Fox News is still distorting the facts:
    http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/01/11/years-global-cooling-coming-sa...
    The tiny footnote they have added is insufficiently corrective of the errors of fact:
    Editor's note: An earlier version of this article erroneously reported that the NSIDC reports concluded that the warming of the Earth since 1900 is due to natural oceanic cycles.


    ... the issue of cooling resurfaced following an address by Mojib Latif to the World Climate Conference in Geneva. Latif, a climatologist at the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences at Kiel University in Germany, was speaking of the need for greater accuracy in predicting climate change on a decade-by-decade scale. He noted that because of natural variability in the climate, it is theoretically possible that we could see "a decade, or maybe even two, when the temperature cools relative to the present level".
    [my emphasis]
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/29/climate-science-2009

    That statement, in its whole context, boils down to:
    We are experiencing global warming.
    The warming trend is rising.
    Hypothetically it is possible that there might be a decade or two of relative cooling -
    (by implication, followed by further warming) - but, nevertheless, warming is predicted.
    Fox News is notorious for distorting the facts. That's what they do best! ; )

    Eric
    briantaylor
    Nobody should watch Fox news, unless it  to listen to that delightful Glenn Beck, now there is a sane, intelligent, trustworthy news program!
    logicman
    Even the once-trusted BBC has been getting in on the act:
    For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8299079.stm
    compare with data such as:
    http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/info/warming/
    I had to laugh at the comment "once-trusted BBC". Don't worry, heat seekers are still in control, but each new climate-gate/himalaya-gate revelation makes it harder for them to suppress dissent.

    Have a look at this for some perspective:
    http://c3headlines.typepad.com/.a/6a010536b58035970c0120a62f87f3970c-pi

    logicman
    Adam: thanks for the link.  It's a brilliant illustration of bad science plotted on a pretty graph.

    The plotters - an apt term - are Cliff Harris and Andy Mann.
    If you go to their page, you’ll see a graph (which I won’t reproduce here) which shows several ups and downs in global temperature during the past 4500 years. One question comes to mind immediately, where did they get their data? No hints about that, and this doesn’t look like any graph I’ve seen. The most scientific this graph gets is where they try to correlate the cold periods with volcanic eruptions, but their bias comes through when they chart the Hebrew Exodus from Egypt and the birth of Christ.
    http://yetanotheratheistblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/22/sometimes-when-youre-stumbling-you-step-in-a-pile-of-crap/