Banner
    2012 Wolf Prize In Physics
    By Johannes Koelman | February 15th 2012 10:42 PM | 14 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Johannes

    I am a Dutchman, currently living in the US. Following a PhD in theoretical physics (spin-polarized quantum systems*) I entered a Global Fortune

    ...

    View Johannes's Profile
    Those working on quantum gravity have to accept the fact they are unlikely to ever compete for a Nobel in physics. No matter how brilliant and how widely accepted the contribution, a Nobel prize in physics is not awarded as long as the work has not been verified experimentally. I am not sticking my neck out very far when I predict that a direct detection of quantum gravity effects will not happen before the end of this century. And as Nobels don't get awarded posthumously, the Hawkings of this world have to put their hopes on alternative prizes that are less focused on experimental verification.

    Fortunately, such alternative prizes do exist. Their status amongst physicists varies widely. And although none of them competes with the Nobel in physics in terms of status, one prize is generally considered the next best thing next to a Nobel: the Wolf Prize in Physics.

    Jacob BekensteinJacob Bekenstein has been announced as the latest recipient of this prize. He will receive the award – a certificate and prize money to the sum of US$ 100,000 – in recognition of his groundbreaking work in formulating the thermodynamics of black holes. Bekenstein joins black hole theorists like his doctoral advisor John Wheeler, as well as Roger Penrose and Stephen Hawking, all of them earlier recipients of this prize.

    Why all these Wolf Prizes for black hole physics? Surely quantum gravity is a much wider subject that extends far beyond black holes!

    True. However, black holes provide the perfect playground for quantum gravity researchers. Black holes are to quantum gravity what hydrogen atoms are to quantum mechanics: a model system that renders the unexplored new physics most visible. As long as we don't fully understand black holes, there is no hope of mastering quantum gravity. 

    Jacob Bekenstein was the first to apply thermodynamics to black holes. This led to the identification of the surface area of the black hole horizon with its entropy. This in turn triggered Hawking to come up with the concept of black-hole radiation, and also led to the formulation of the holographic principle by Susskind and 't Hooft. Black hole thermodynamics continuous to be an active area of research, and a lot of dust needs to settle before we can claim to understand black holes from a quantum perspective. Bekenstein's contribution, however, stands firm and forms the basis of current research such as entropic gravity

    A Wolf prize long due and well deserved!

    Bekenstein will be presented with the award by Israel President Shimon Peres, at a special ceremony at the Knesset on May 13th.

    Comments

    The way physics is developing, the Nobel prizes for physics are probably getting too conservative. The flip side is that no award of this prize got regretted later. Good to see the Physics Wolf go to Bekenstein.

    May I propose something to think about?
    Hard to prove, even if we assume that gravity is not an attraction force but the statistical result of a dual opposing quantum impulse system,see: the inertia oscillator figure 10. will not do the job.
    http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0024v3.pdf

    Quantum Gravity and Electro magnetic forces in quantum Function Follows Form theory.

    I disagree that we may have to wait 90 yrs for QG verification, as it may have already happened. Last summer, French researchers looked at data from the INTEGRAL sat for signs of polarization dispersion in gamma rays, & found such, corresponding to a scale of quantum gravity 14 decades below the Planck length or about 10^ -49 meters. Nothing short of mindblowing, this result has been met with deafening silence by the community which has enshrined the Planck scale as the QG sector for 50 yrs.
    In addition, Fermilab is now constructing a dedicated interferometer, the `Holometer' to refine `Planck-scale' noise, first seen in the GEO600 grav wave detector a few yrs ago. QG phenomenology is alive & well in this century.

    Johannes Koelman
    This is incorrect. INTEGRAL has not detected any quantum gravity effects. On the contrary, the INTEGRAL team claims such effects on spacetime granularity to be absent down to at least many orders below the Planck length: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-06-physics-einstein.html
    I would argue that by setting this lower bound of ~10^-49m, they have effectively thrown a monkey wrench (pipe bomb?) into all prior theories of QG, which demand that the granularity of space-time manifest near the Planck scale of ~10^-35m.
    This was canon for 50 yrs & in textbooks. No more.
    Now, QG phenomenology is 14 decades removed from the Planck scale , a stunning result (BTW, the physorg article contains a typo, claiming 13 decades). Similar to the hierarchy problem, whereby radiative corrections should push the Higgs mass up 17 decades to the Planck scale, at least solutions like SUSY & Xtra dims were poisted. This is much more disturbing, as no one knows why this 2nd `Great Desert' should exist, nor why QG effex should be absent from where they were `supposed' to be..

    ok.how does the "dark energy" and black holes INTERACT?given a test mass and a bh,which is the distance in newton's law:from the mass to the center of the bh or only just to some horizon?

    ok.dark energy star,turbulence as d.e.s/b.h membrane paradigm and still have the holographic principle.how about that?

    if proceeding as William H. Depperman(zupper long post),at one time there will be only "black holes(dark energy stars)" and vacuum.not a Gödel universe?dust swirling particles+required fine tuning~today's sparse bh/des hence "singularities",tomorrow's "regular" omni prevailing dust.

    http://publish.uwo.ca/~jbell/Time.pdf of course traveling into the future is nonsense,traveling into the past will became possible UNLESS you already,in your deja-past,in your history,had taken too many wrong turns, wrong paths,that will prevent you from reaching the point,the gateway,to the past.that's about constructing the future,preserving some chance s.scientific development?more like eroding FASTER the limited resources than OPENING, faster ,new ways.that means "the end of the science".that means you/we are dead,pending only supernatural,religious resurrection.

    "of course traveling into the future is nonsense"
    Nonsense? I do it all the time! At this very moment I am travelling to the future of today, which I call 'tomorrow'. And when I arrive there, I have to continue my travel into ever more distant futures.

    derek_potter
    of course traveling into the future is nonsense
    Really?

    Time travel may very well be ruled out for physical reasons but there is no logical argument against it that stands up to a little thought.
    http://publish.uwo.ca/~jbell/Time.pdf
    for example, is a mishmash of unwarrented assumptions and recursive definitions.

     
    fine-tuning?that's the butterfly effect IN THE making! some theories,some experiments are requiring some expensive,technological advanced tools:supercomputers,lhc,etc.how about the oil end,how about COPPER being exhausted(2038,at latest),gold in max 10 years?perelman did prove only with pencil and paper what poincare was almost sure of 100 years before.and you know what?grisha is already OFF.we know fermat's theorem is true but we know almost nothing about it-we cannot prove the way fermat proved it..."modern" reasoning seems to me to be more like kab~balah than as ancient greek geometry...

    about previous post,"einstein,steroids,dirac..." and your bet on neutrino:
    ok.so we have zitterbewegung,brownian motion.is "t"(time) in schrodinger really T=TEMPERATURE?no "zag" for neutrinos?does this look much as wheeler's "one electron world" and feynman answer "there are no equal amount of positrons"(electrons cutting the other way the world line)?how about "sphere eversion"?entropic gravity>temperature?

    The recipients of these awards should be lauded and celebrated like movie stars.
    I don't understand why people don't have that kind of awe for science which they have for other trivial stuff.

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.