Banner
    Detailed Seismic Imaging Exposes Yellowstone's Geologic Plumbing
    By News Staff | December 14th 2009 12:00 AM | 5 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    According to four studies appearing in the latest issue of the Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, the plumbing that feeds the Yellowstone supervolcano shows a plume of molten rock rising at an angle from the northwest at a depth of at least 410 miles, contradicting claims that there is only shallow hot rock moving like slowly boiling soup.

    The research also indicates that the banana-shaped magma chamber of molten rock a few miles beneath Yellowstone is 20 percent larger than previously believed, so a future cataclysmic eruption could be even larger than thought.

     The studies of Yellowstone's plume also suggests the same "hotspot" that feeds Yellowstone volcanism also triggered the Columbia River "flood basalts" that buried parts of Oregon, Washington state and Idaho with lava starting 17 million years ago.


    Seismic imaging was used by University of Utah scientists to construct this 3-D picture of the Yellowstone hotspot plume of hot and molten rock that feeds the shallower magma chamber (not shown). Researchers believe "blobs" of hot rock float off the top of the plume, then rise to recharge the magma chamber located 3.7 miles to 10 miles beneath the surface at Yellowstone. The illustration also shows a region of warm rock extending southwest from near the top of the plume. It represents the eastern Snake River Plain, where the Yellowstone hotspot triggered numerous cataclysmic caldera eruptions before the plume started feeding Yellowstone 2.05 million years ago.


    "We have a clear image, using seismic waves from earthquakes, showing a mantle plume that extends from beneath Yellowstone,''  says University of Utah Geophysicist Robert Smith.

      The plume angles downward 150 miles to the west-northwest of Yellowstone and reaches a depth of at least 410 miles, Smith says. The study estimates the plume is mostly hot rock, with 1 percent to 2 percent molten rock in sponge-like voids within the hot rock.

    Some researchers have doubted the existence of a mantle plume feeding Yellowstone, arguing instead that the area's volcanic and hydrothermal features are fed by convection – the boiling-like rising of hot rock and sinking of cooler rock – from relatively shallow depths of only 185 miles to 250 miles.

    Some 17 million years ago, the Yellowstone hotspot was located beneath the Oregon-Idaho-Nevada border region, feeding a plume of hot and molten rock that produced "caldera" eruptions – the biggest kind of volcanic eruption on Earth.

    As North America slid southwest over the hotspot, the plume generated more than 140 huge eruptions that produced a chain of giant craters – calderas – extending from the Oregon-Idaho-Nevada border northeast to the current site of Yellowstone National Park, where huge caldera eruptions happened 2.05 million, 1.3 million and 642,000 years ago.

    These eruptions were 2,500, 280 and 1,000 times bigger, respectively, than the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens. The eruptions covered as much as half the continental United States with inches to feet of volcanic ash. The Yellowstone caldera, 40 miles by 25 miles, is the remnant of that last giant eruption.

    The new study reinforces the view that the hot and partly molten rock feeding volcanic and geothermal activity at Yellowstone isn't vertical, but has three components:

    The 45-mile-wide plume that rises through Earth's upper mantle from at least 410 miles beneath the surface. The plume angles upward to the east-southeast until it reaches the colder rock of the North American crustal plate, and flattens out like a 300-mile-wide pancake about 50 miles beneath Yellowstone. The plume includes several wider "blobs" at depths of 355 miles, 310 miles and 265 miles.

    "This conduit is not one tube of constant thickness," says Smith. "It varies in width at various depths, and we call those things blobs."

    A little-understood zone, between 50 miles and 10 miles deep, in which blobs of hot and partly molten rock break off of the flattened top of the plume and slowly rise to feed the magma reservoir directly beneath Yellowstone National Park.

    A magma reservoir 3.7 miles to 10 miles beneath the Yellowstone caldera. The reservoir is mostly sponge-like hot rock with spaces filled with molten rock. "It looks like it's up to 8 percent or 15 percent melt," says Smith. "That's a lot."

    Researchers previously believed the magma chamber measured roughly 6 to 15 miles from southeast to northwest, and 20 or 25 miles from southwest to northeast, but new measurements indicate the reservoir extends at least another 13 miles outside the caldera's northeast boundary, Smith says.

    He says the gravity and other data show the magma body "is an elongated structure that looks like a banana with the ends up. It is a lot larger than we thought – I would say about 20 percent [by volume]. This would argue there might be a larger magma source available for a future eruption."

     Images of the magma reservoir were made based on the strength of Earth's gravity at various points in Yellowstone. Hot and molten rock is less dense than cold rock, so the tug of gravity is measurably lower above magma reservoirs.

    The Yellowstone caldera, like other calderas on Earth, huffs upward and puffs downward repeatedly over the ages, usually without erupting. Since 2004, the caldera floor has risen 3 inches per year, suggesting recharge of the magma body beneath it.

    How to View a Plume
    Seismic imaging uses earthquake waves that travel through the Earth and are recorded by seismometers. Waves travel more slowly through hotter rock and more quickly in cooler rock. Just as X-rays are combined to make CT-scan images of features in the human body, seismic wave data are melded to produce images of Earth's interior.

     The study, the Yellowstone Geodynamics Project, was conducted during 1999-2005. It used an average of 160 temporary and permanent seismic stations – and as many as 200 – to detect waves from some 800 earthquakes, with the stations spaced 10 miles to 22 miles apart – closer than other networks and better able to "see" underground. Some 160 Global Positioning System stations measured crustal movements.

    By integrating seismic and GPS data, "it's like a lens that made the upper 125 miles much clearer and allowed us to see deeper, down to 410 miles," Smith says.

    The study also shows warm rock – not as hot as the plume – stretching from Yellowstone southwest under the Snake River Plain, at depths of 20 miles to 60 miles. The rock is still warm from eruptions before the hotspot reached Yellowstone.

    A Plume Blowing in the 2-inch-per-year Mantle Wind
    Seismic imaging shows a "slow" zone from the top of the plume, which is 50 miles deep, straight down to about 155 miles, but then as you travel down the plume, it tilts to the northwest as it dives to a depth of 410 miles, says Smith.

    That is the base of the global transition zone – from 250 miles to 410 miles deep – that is the boundary between the upper and lower mantle – the layers below Earth's crust.

    At that depth, the plume is about 410 miles beneath the town of Wisdom, Mont., which is 150 miles west-northwest of Yellowstone, says Smith.

    He says "it wouldn't surprise me" if the plume extends even deeper, perhaps originating from the core-mantle boundary some 1,800 miles deep.

    Why doesn't the plume rise straight upward? "This plume material wants to come up vertically, it wants to buoyantly rise," says Smith. "But it gets caught in the 'wind' of the upper mantle flow, like smoke rising in a breeze." Except in this case, the "breeze" of slowly flowing upper mantle rock is moving horizontally 2 inches per year.

     While the crustal plate moves southwest, the warm, underlying mantle slowly boils due to convection, with warm areas moving upward and cooler areas downward. Northwest of Yellowstone, this convection is such that the plume is "blown" east-southeast by mantle convection, so it angles upward toward Yellowstone.

    A Common Source for Yellowstone and the Columbia River Basalts?
    Based on how the Yellowstone plume slants now, Smith and colleagues projected on a map where the plume might have originated at depth when the hotspot was erupting at the Oregon-Idaho-Nevada border area from 17 million to almost 12 million years ago.

    They saw overlap, between the zones within the Earth where eruptions originated near the Oregon-Idaho-Nevada border and where the famed Columbia River Basalt eruptions originated when they were most vigorous 17 million to 14 million years ago.

    Their conclusion: the Yellowstone hotspot plume might have fed those gigantic lava eruptions, which covered much of eastern Oregon and eastern Washington state.

    I argue it is the common source," Smith says. "It's neat stuff and it fits together."

    Citation: Robert B. Smith, Michael Jordan, Bernhard Steinberger, Christine Puskas, Jamie Farrell, Greg Waite, Stephan Husen, Wu-Lung Chang, and Richard O'Connel, 'Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research', Nov. 2009, 188 26–56; doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.08.020

    Comments

    well, that's not cheery following last year this time, the park experienced an unusual number of earthquakes

    Not to worry, nina. The latest seismic data from the USGS indicates that the magma chamber above the mantle plume has branched off into two relatively narrow columns, neither of which being capable of producing a supervolcanic eruption. Now eventually there is going to be an eruption of the Yellowstone caldera. But vulcanologist expect it to a normal volcanic eruption. There simply isn't enough magma near the surface to produce a super eruption. And it doesn't look like Yellowstone is going to erupt anytime soon--at least not in our lifetimes.

    Earthquakes per se are not necessarily an indicator of an imminent eruption. It's more the types of earthquakes along with the gases being emitted that tell geologists when an a volcano is likely to erupt. Believe it or not earthquakes are a good thing. It is a tool by which geologists can pretty accurately predict an eruption. And geologists have gotten pretty good at predicting eruptions. One breakthrough that has been is the science of long duration seismic events. These are the tell-tale signs of an impending volcanic eruption. This technique was first developed by the geophysicist  Bernard Chouet who was working at the time with the USGS in volcanic seismology.


    Thanks Eric, I really have to watch fewer disaster shows and documentaries.

    I find horror movies don't really cut it anymore to get the adrenaline going.

    You're quite welcome, Nina. And, I know what you mean about watching too many documentaries on potentially catastrophic natural disasters. I mean it's true that we live on a very dangerous planet that appears to keep trying to kill us at every turn. In fact we live in a very dangerous universe that seems bent on our destruction. But if you dwell on this stuff too much, you can drive yourself crazy. And unfortunately, I think a lot of documentaries like to focus on the most terrifying aspects and worst case scenarios, just to get peoples interest up and boost ratings without giving them all of the facts. But, I have been studying volcanoes for quite some time. And people who live around volcanoes need to be cautious, but at the same time they must remember that these volcanoes are very closely monitored by vulcanologists and they have to keep their perspective on things. And the technology of predicting eruptions has come a long way just in the last decade--to the point where it has become a true science.

    In my experience even stratovolcanoes, which are the most explosive and dangerous volcanoes in the world, most of the time are nothing more than a nuisance to the residents living near them. To give you an example, while I was analyzing the seismic data from the Mount Redoubt eruptions using Dr. Chouet's technique for predicting eruptions, I was at the same time communicating daily with a friend in Alaska who lived near Mt. Redoubt. Her biggest complaint was dealing with the volcanic ash that she had to rake up from her lawn. She would have to water down the ash in order to keep it from becoming air-born. I warned her to wear a mask when raking because the ash contains razor sharp microscopic shards of volcanic glass--something that you definitely don't want to get into your lungs and air passages. But other than that, she and her neighbors found the eruptions of Mt. Redoubt a source of entertainment. I, on the other hand, would inform her when the next eruption was most likely to occur based on the seismic data. I got pretty good at it. I was able to be precise enough in my predictions using Dr. Chouet's techniques where I could tell her whether an eruption was going to occur in the morning or the afternoon or at night. And Mount Redoubt is your typical startovolcano that has a history of a long period of eruptions, which makes it ideal to study. I had about a 98% rate of accuracy in my predictions. In fact here's a copy of a seismogram that I saved of one of the eruptions that I predicted.


    Afterward she gave me a full account of the eruption.

    The places to worry about are heavily populated areas like Naples, Italy. There and in other surrounding communities you have to worry about evacuating approximately 3 million people in densely populated areas. With Mount Vesuvius you not only have to worry about suffocating ash, but 900° plus pyroclastic flow that can travel at speeds in excess of 400 mph. And then you have to worry about the lava flows which will destroy anything that the pyroclastic flow already hasn't. And because of the way the crater at the top of Vesuvius is oriented, Naples is in the direct path that the lava flows would follow.

    They recently did a seismic profile of the magma chamber beneath Vesuvius, analogous to an ultra-sound image, and found that it was wider than the base of Vesuvius. And the longer Vesuvius goes without erupting the more pressure will build and the more explosive and devastating the eruption will be. The Italian government has even offered to pay residents to move out of the area. But the residents refuse to go. So that's a stratovolcano that people should worry about and not the Yellowstone caldera. ;-)

    Eric
    quake in southern California today

    looks like the pacific rim is doing a shimmey

    who's next Alaska or BC?