Banner
    Easterlin Paradox: Chinese Discover Money Does Not Buy Happiness
    By News Staff | May 15th 2012 01:30 PM | 2 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    Things would seem to be good in China.  They are the only world economy not in a financial demilitarized zone, things are booming.  

    Yet more money is not making people there happier. They're actually less happy today than shortly after the Tiananmen Square protest in Beijing was crushed by the military, says economist Richard Easterlin, researcher in "happiness economics" and namesake of the Easterlin Paradox.

    The problem is the same as in any growing country.  When everyone is miserable, everyone is somewhat happy. When gains in prosperity are unequal, those left behind have increasing unhappiness. In 1990, a large majority of Chinese people across age, education, income levels, and regions reported high levels of life satisfaction.  68 percent of those in the wealthiest income bracket and 65 percent of those in the poorest income bracket reported high levels of satisfaction in 1990. 

    China is substantially more prosperous now but the percentage of the poorest Chinese who say they are satisfied with their lives has fallen a lot. Only 42 percent of Chinese people in the lowest income bracket reported high levels of life satisfaction in 2010, while the happiness of the wealthiest Chinese grew about 3 percentage points, to 71 percent.  That's still a lot of happiness for rich people, which is why the New York Times contends maybe money does buy happiness after all.

    Overall, life satisfaction among Chinese fell sharply in the early 1990s, bottomed out in the 2000s and has since recovered to about the same or slightly lower levels of individual happiness — despite the largest period of economic growth in history and a quadrupling of China's GDP per capita. The analysis uses a wide range of data sets on self-reported life satisfaction and is the first to track happiness trends in China over a long period (from 1990 to 2010) rather than using simple comparisons of points in time.

    The overall downward trajectory in life satisfaction among low-income people in China, the most populous country in the world, is similar to observed trends in the transition countries of central and eastern Europe, and in both areas reflects the emergence of substantial unemployment and the dissolution of the social safety net, correlating to declining satisfaction in particular areas of life such as household finances and health.


    "There are many who believe that well-being is increased by economic growth, and that the faster the growth, the happier people are. There could hardly be a better country than China to test these expectations," said Easterlin, University Professor and Professor of Economics at the University of Southern California. "But there is no evidence of a marked increase in life satisfaction in China of the magnitude that might have been expected due to the enormous multiplication in per capita consumption. Indeed people are slightly less happy overall, and China has gone from being one of the most egalitarian countries in the world in terms of life satisfaction to one of the least."

    On one of the surveys, people in China were asked a general question about how they viewed their own health. In 1990, a majority of Chinese people in both the wealthiest bracket and the poorest bracket rated their health as "good" or "very good" — with only a four percentage point divide across income levels. By 2007, the divide in perception about personal health had grown to 28 points, driven by a decline in self-reported health among the poorest Chinese and an increase among the wealthiest.

    "One may reasonably ask how it is possible for life satisfaction not to improve in the face of such dramatic per capita economic growth," said Easterlin. "There is more to life satisfaction than material goods, and there is an important policy lesson here for the Chinese government and policymakers generally: among ordinary Chinese people, especially the less educated and lower-income, jobs and income security, reliable and affordable health care, and provision for children and the elderly, are of critical importance to life satisfaction."


    Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    Comments

    Tony Fleming
    Yes I think this article has hit upon a truth; money is only so good up to a certain level. Then material wealth leaves a vacuum if not a disaster area. A TV show I watched today spoke about the 'cancer cities' in poor remote regions of China where toxic wastes are stored with frequent catastrophic results. Often these toxic wastes leech into rivers used by the local farmers for irrigation who then grow carcinogenic crops resulting in cancer clusters in the remote population. 
    China needs to balance the way it seeks to develop and learn from the mistakes of the West.  
    Tony Fleming Biophotonics Research Institute tfleming@unifiedphysics.com
    Bonny Bonobo alias Brat
    Tony, I also watched this same shocking SBS Dateline documentary about how these thousands of rural Chinese, their children and also their animals are paying this terrible cost with their lives and health, often dying from cancers caused by China's thriving economy and its resultant toxic waste dumps and pollution and the complete lack of  safety controls and regulations in these rural area's water supplies. This excerpt from the documentary about hundreds of  'cancer villages' is only about 16 minutes long and very well worth watching but it is also very disturbing! There is also a map for Chinese people to refer to at http://www.sbs.com.au/dateline/story/related/aid/569/id/601459/n/China-s-Cancer-Villages Xinglong, featured in Adrian’s report, is one of the places that’s had the most media attention, but it’s estimated there are more than 500 cancer villages across China.


    I

    Investigative journalist Deng Fei helped put together this map showing the spread of villages in 2009. Many are near the east coast, but studies since suggest increased movement inland to poorer and less educated areas.The cancer areas have also been mapped by Lee Liu from the University of Central Missouri for Environment Magazine.

    He believes water contamination from industrial pollution is the main cause of cancer villages. Many are clustered around major rivers, which have become heavily polluted from industry based near waterways.
    “These industries have contributed to rapid GDP growth in their regions,” he writes, but “this growth has been achieved at the expenses of the health and lives of poor villagers… leading to the devastation of the village economies.”
    Lee Liu is critical of government controls on the media, legal system and NGOs, which he says have allowed the problem to spread because of a lack of reporting. Reliable figures on cancer deaths in China are hard to obtain, but at least an 80% increase in cancer deaths has been reported since the start of economic reforms more than 30 years ago. Chinese farmers are now said to be four times more likely to die from liver cancer than the global average. Rural areas have also reported higher mortality rates than urban areas from liver, stomach, oesophageal and cervical cancers.
    Testing pollution
    Last year, Greenpeace carried out tests in Xinglong to assess the pollution. In an underground aquifer, it found water that tested hundreds of times over the safe limit for chromium. 
    Chromium is a heavy metal used in the manufacture of materials like stainless steel and tanned leather. It occurs naturally in small amounts in the earth's crust, but according to the World Health Organization, larger amounts can pollute drinking water and cause cancer. Ma Tianjie from Greenpeace reported that people were planting crops barefoot and putting their animals out on the contaminated land, because they just weren’t aware of the danger from the 5,000 tons of hazardous waste dumped nearby.
    Greenpeace says its research and the subsequent media attention have helped, with China’s Ministry of Environmental Protection announcing a national crackdown on chromium waste sites. But chromium is extremely difficult to dispose of. Greenpeace says some contaminated sites in the US are still not completely clean after 30 years of work, so China still has a long way to go.
    Sources: China Digital Times/Environment/Guardian/Greenpeace/World Health Organization




    Make love not war