Banner
    Is Sign Language Inborn? Kid Gestures Organize Into Language-Like Sequences
    By News Staff | June 8th 2014 02:02 AM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    Young children instinctively use a ‘language-like’ structure to communicate through gestures, a result which suggests that children are not just learning language from older generations, but instead their preference for communication has shaped how languages look today.

    In the paper, the research team examined how four-year-olds, 12-year-olds and adults used gestures to communicate in the absence of speech. The study investigated whether their gesturing breaks down complex information into simpler concepts. This is similar to the way that language expresses complex information by breaking it down into units (such as words) to express a simpler concept, which are then strung together into a phrase or sentence.

    The researchers showed the participants animations of motion events, depicting either a smiling square or circle that moved up or down a slope in a particular manner (eg jump or rolling). Each participant was asked to use their hands to mime the action they saw on the screen without speaking. The researchers examined whether the upward or downward path and the manner of motion were expressed simultaneously in a single gesture or expressed in two separated gestures depicting its manner or path.

    Study co-leader Dr. Sotaro Kita from the University of Warwick’s Department of Psychology said, “Compared to the 12-year-olds and the adults, the four-year-olds showed the strongest tendencies to break down the manner of motion and the path of motion into two separate gestures, even though the manner and path were simultaneous in the original event.

    “This means the four-year-olds miming was more language-like, breaking down complex information into simpler units and expressing one piece of information at a time. Just as young children are good at learning languages, they also tend to make their communication look more like a language.”

    Study co-leader Dr. Zanna Clay from the University of Neuchatel said,  “Previous studies of sign languages created by deaf children have shown that young children use gestures to segment information and to re-organise it into language-like sequences. We wanted to examine whether hearing children are also more likely to use gesture to communicate the features of an event in segmented ways when compared to adolescents and adults.”

    The researchers suggest the study provides insight into why languages of the world have universal properties.

    Kita added, “All languages of the world break down complex information into simpler units, like words, and express them one by one. This may be because all languages have been learned by, therefore shaped by, young children. In other words, generations of young children’s preference for communication may have shaped how languages look today.”

    Citation: Young Children Make Their Gestural Communication Systems More Language-Like, Segmentation and Linearization of Semantic Elements in Motion Events, Zanna Clay, Sally Pople, Bruce Hood, Sotaro Kita, Psychological Science June 4, 2014

    Comments

    This is a confusing study. All speech is articulation, and all languages, be they signed or vocal (or even tactile) require articulatory gestures in order to "flatten" conceptual information into strings of signal data. Also, the human faculty for language is inborn. It's hard to see what their point is.

    Hank
    A desire to make signaling functional is not the same as an innate ability to organize signing. I think that an innate ability to sign may have impacted language - rather than the other way around - is interesting conjecture. Of course, you are correct that little about neuroscience will really have any answer in 2014 but it takes baby steps.
    Oh! Yes, you're right, that sign language may be prior to vocal language rather than the other way around is a super interesting hypothesis! I have some experience in experimental linguistics, and that particular order of precedence is central to my understanding of the human language faculty, but this is evidence in support of that, which is no small feat! Thanks for sharing!