The turnaround of the three physics questions I offered a few days ago, to stimulate your neurons and extract you from the chocolate and alcohol flood caused by the usual string of Christmas parties and dinners, was rather scarce. Despite that, I wish to repeat the offer today, making some adjustments to reach a wider public. The questions I offer here are easier but still not accessible to everybody. However, my plans are that at least the answers I will give in a couple of days will be understandable. Further, anyone can try the bonus question I ask at the bottom of this piece...
So below are three more questions on experimental high-energy physics, a bit more accessible than the previous ones. Please try them and report your answers below. The time you spend on the test will not be wasted!
1) The LHC experiments will search for Z bosons in their early 2010 data. The Z decay to muon pairs, in particular, provides a means to verify the correct alignment of tracking detectors and the precise modeling of the magnetic field inside the solenoid, which bends charged tracks traversing its volume.
If the signal cross section equals 50 nanobarns, and only three decays in a hundred produce muon pairs, calculate the integrated luminosity required to identify 100 candidates, assuming that the efficiency with which a muon is detected is 70%.
Hint: you will need to use the formula , and all the information provided above.
2) In the decay of stopped muons, , the produced electron is observed to have an energy spectrum peaking close to the maximum allowed value. What is this maximum value, and what causes the preferential decay to energetic electrons ?
Hint: you might find inspiration in the answer to the first question I posted on Dec. 26th.
3) The decay to an electron-neutrino pair of the W boson occurs one-ninth of the time, because the W may also decay to the other lepton pairs and to light quarks, and the universality of charged weak currents guarantees an equal treatment of all fermion pairs. The question is: if the W boson had a mass of 300 GeV, what would the rate of electron-neutrino decays ?
Hint: the top quark would play a role...
Bonus question: What do you get if you put together three sexy red quarks ?
Answers in a couple of days... Take your thinking hat and start working now!
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Kudos To "The Independent" Newspaper For Debunking Nibiru "Blood Moon" Hoax
- Your Microbiome Did Not Cause Your Weight Problem
- A Great Blitz Game
- Gödel,Frenkel, Kurzweil, and Hawkins on AI
- Control Cancer By Making The Tumor Cell Environment Hostile
- Free Market Validation: Men With Hair Transplants Are Seen As Younger, More Attractive
- Stopping Scars Before They Form
- "Its very much real mr walker and im scared to death now and i mean really really scared ..."
- "Great, glad to hear it and thanks for signing the petition :)...."
- "Well, I´m not worried anymore about nibiru, because I know is a hoax afterall and also I sign..."
- "Thanks, Skynix, glad you like the articles. Yes of course, to many readers of Science20 then what..."
- "Yes that's a good point, the Moon can look reddish just as the sun does when close to the horizon..."
- Gallup Poll: Great Example of How to Bias a Social Science Study
- Another Kardashian Craze Debunked
- Fad Friday: Ditch The Body Wrap!
- Commonly Cited Stat of 10 Bacteria for Every 1 Human Cell Is Wrong
- Why The EpiPen And Other Generic Drugs Are So Expensive
- Latest IARC Report Connects Fatness with More Cancers
- Solving a 48-year-old mystery: Scientists grow noroviruses in human intestinal cell cultures
- Scripps Florida scientists shed new light on the role of calcium in learning and memory
- Volcanic eruption masked acceleration in sea level rise
- Sunflowers move from east to west, and back, by the clock
- Earlier snowmelt reduces forests' ability to regulate atmospheric carbon dioxide