Banner
    One More Prize For Fabrizio Tamburini
    By Tommaso Dorigo | March 12th 2014 06:56 AM | 13 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Tommaso

    I am an experimental particle physicist working with the CMS experiment at CERN. In my spare time I play chess, abuse the piano, and aim my dobson...

    View Tommaso's Profile
    Fabrizio Tamburini, the Italian researcher who has discovered an innovative way to multiply the transmission of electromagnetic signals by exploiting the vorticity of photons, has received last Saturday the "San Valentino prize" at Palazzo Gazzolli in Terni, Italy.

    The annual prize was founded in 1969 by Agostino Pensa and is meant to recognize the professional devotion of scientist and artists to their work. In the past years the prize has gone, among others, to several distinguished physicists: Ugo Amaldi, Carlo Rubbia, Emilio Segre', Tullio Regge. 


    Tamburini (left in the above picture at the prize giving in Terni), who until a few years ago was a practically unknown researcher with no permanent position and allegedly scarce prospects of a career in academia, is the mastermind of a groundbreaking discovery which is going to revolutionize the world of electromagnetic transmissions. He is a striking example of how Italy is incapable of recognizing the talent of its scientists. Now he does not need the support of Academia any longer: he is receiving offers from the major companies in the world, eager to exploit his patented techniques. Below is a token of appreciation he recently received from one of those companies -a Ferrari. Tamburini is an avid pilot and he often regrets having chosen physics rather than professional driving competitions as a career - but we are all happy that he ended up as a scientist!



    Along with his collaborators, Tamburini has recently produced experimental evidence that radio techniques can be used for synthesizing and analyzing non-integer electromagnetic (EM) orbital angular momentum (OAM) of radiation. The technique used amounts to sample, in space and time, the EM field vectors and digitally processing the data to calculate the vortex structure, the spatial phase distribution, and the OAM spectrum of the radiation. The experimental verification that OAM-carrying beams can be readily generated and exploited by using radio techniques paves the way to an entirely new paradigm of radar and radio communication protocols.

    For more information on Tamburini's research, see this article.

    Comments

    So I just found [1] and if I understood it correctly, OAM is an additional modulation method which can be applied additionally to existing modulations like AM, FM and PM? Adding another dof which is intrinsic to it's frequency that means? Now that's really novel.
    Do you know if OAM can only applied to entangled photon-pairs? That's something I didn't quite understood yet (and also has implications on the feasibility in real-life applications outside a lab).
    Also, how many wavelengths does it take to pack in a single bit of information?

    Exciting!

    1. http://www.physics.irfu.se/Publications/Presentations/ThideEtTamburini:A...

    dorigo
    Hi Alex,

    Fabrizio tells me that it is not true that OAM is only applicable to entangled pairs. He says there is a lot of literature on the subject, but I cannot point to anything in particular at the moment.

    Cheers,
    T.
    I've got to disagree with Tommaso on this one. This sounds over hyped: "... is the mastermind of a groundbreaking discovery which is going to revolutionize the world of electromagnetic transmissions..."

    There are many people that are skeptical; here's a summary from an IEEE article:
    http://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/wireless/a-new-twist-on-radio-waves
    "... at its heart, radio transmission using orbital angular momentum is no different from the multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication technology in use today."

    Now, trying to think this out myself. I think it comes down to: Are we missing any free modes in electromagnetism when we use horizontal and vertically polarized modes as our basis?

    Tommaso, what do you think? Are we neglecting some free modes when we do this?

    Orbital angular momentum (OAM) modes can be decomposed into spatial distributions of the polarization freedoms. So this is nothing more than MIMO, and it is being severely misrepresented as a "groundbreaking discovery" allowing potentially infinite channels because there are infinite OAM modes.

    I have yet to read this paper, but from the abstract it sounds for reasons similar to what I gave above, that the radio channel claims by Fabrizio Tamburini would lead to a violation of the second law of thermodynamics.
    http://vixra.org/abs/1209.0107

    In short, there is a lot of reason to be skeptical that these radio techniques provides anything beyond techiques already in use for radio communications today. It does not appear far field radio communications will be able to benefit from this. It is science after all, so let's go test the idea. But extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

    dorigo
    Lagrangians, the tests have already taken place. I think you need to read the literature and then
    give a look at the demonstrations. Unfortunately I have no links in English handy... I will
    look for some information

    Cheers,
    T.
    Tommaso,

    You are correct that "the tests have already taken place", but they show nothing beyond traditional MIMO.

    /Ove E

    Tommaso,
    I agree with the skeptics here. It's one thing to use OAM modes with some wave guide or laser beam, but it is still fundamentally using spatial distribution to encode the extra information. This is not an extra degree of internal freedom. That is why this cannot be used in far field radio transmissions.

    I think Lagrangians's question helps point this out, but you avoided answering. I'll reword it here slightly:
    If we use right and left circular polarization, overall phase, and momentum as our basis for free electromagnetic radiation, are you actually claiming we are missing some modes ... that there are extra degrees of freedom we can't build from this?

    Tommaso, I'm curious to here your answer.
    Hopefully pondering on that will help you understand why Fabrizio's claims are likely wrong. This is nothing more than MIMO.

    Lagrangians,
    To put this in perspective, Tommaso was also willing to give some consideration to cold fusion promoted by an Italian:
    http://www.science20.com/quantum_diaries_survivor/cold_fusion_real-112511
    I think he just has a soft spot for Italian researchers making grand claims.

    I've never seen someone point out and discuss the nationality of researchers as much as Tommaso does.
    If some guy in Russia was making these grandious claims about radio waves, do you think Tommaso would still buy it despite all the skeptics? No, I honestly don't.

    Everyone has their biases, but I wish Tommaso would be more aware of his.
    There is nothing quantum going on here. It is classical radio emmisions. This is just MIMO, pure and simple.

    dorigo
    Hi Steve,

    it's funny, but you couldn't be farther from the truth. I am an internationalist :)
    While Tamburini is indeed a friend of mine, I am the last one in a long row of
    enthusiasts for his work. And the fact that he is being pampered by big companies
    should tell you that this is not a theoretical development with no applications but
    something that will soon be used in the telecommunications industry.

    About Rossi: I hope he changes nationality. If you read between the lines of my
    post on his E-CAT and the comments thread you can easily make up your mind about
    what I think of his device (it's a scam).

    Cheers,
    T.
    HenryB
    And the fact that he is being pampered by big companies should tell you that this is not a theoretical development with no applications but something that will soon be used in the telecommunications industry.
    This is not a very convincing argument to counter the issues people have brought up.  I can see what the skeptics are saying, but I don't really understand what your stance is here.

    Do you at least agree with Steve that these radio transmissions are in the classical realm of Maxwell's equations? 

    And John's question regarding the fundamental degrees of freedom here is also relevant. I too am curious about your answer to that.


    Despondingly, I feel a D-Wave coming on.

    I remember reading about "rotationally polarized" radio waves in New Scientist back in 2000 or so. This is it, I guess.

    http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110222/full/news.2011.114.html

    Tamburini thinks that the bandwidth available to mobile phones and laptop computers could be increased by a factor of nine almost immediately, and at relatively little extra cost, by carefully positioning four antennas inside the devices. He estimates that this technology could enter the market within the next two to five years. Technological improvements could make even more bandwith available.

    Taco Visser, an electrical engineer at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, thinks that twisted radio beams would "certainly increase capacity" in telecommunication channels. But he cautions that atmospheric turbulence, which causes fluctuations in the amplitude and phase of a signal, would probably limit the extent to which beams could be twisted and therefore restrict the number of available channels. He also says it is not clear how portable devices such as mobile phones could emit such twisted beams, because each channel would require its own spiral reflector.

    We need some pictures from MATLAB for visualization.

    dorigo
    For more information see the link I attached at the end of the post as an update...
    This is indeed a great technical acchievement, and I was fortune enough to see a demonstration of the technique some time ago, using two channels with the oldschool parabola antenna which could be tuned between the fundamental mode and the OAM mode. Very impressive.
    I also saw that some electrical engineers couldnt believe that a physicist can revolutionize their field. Several of those engineers wrote critical comments, but it turned out they usually lack of fundamental understandings of Maxwell equations. :)

    Looking forward having this technique in my WLAN router.

    A few points about MIMO vs OAM and OAM vs SAM (wave polarisation):

    1. Every EM field from any arbitrary radio or TV antenna, laser, light bulb, star or whatever object that emits radiowaves, lightwaves etc carry angular momentum density. Precisely as they all carry energy and linear momentum density (also known as Poynting vector). This follows directly from Maxwell's equations.

    2. Wave polarisation (left-hand/right-hand, or horizontal/vertical) is the spin part of the electromagnetic angular momentum. It is therefore called SAM (spin angular momentum) and is entirely different from the OAM which is the orbital part of the angular momentum. It is precisely as with the motion of the earth. It spins on its own axis at a rate of approximately 1 rev per 24 h. This is the earhts SAM. It also orbits around the suna ta a rate of about 1 rev per 365 days. This is the earth's OAM. The SAM (24 h) and the OAM (365 days) have nothing to do with each other. The same is true for photons/electromagnetic fields.

    3. MIMO is based on the use of multiple antennas. It is *necessary* for MIMO to be able to increase the spectral capacity to use multiple antennas at both the transmitting and receiving end. OAM can increase the spectral capacity using only a single antenna at the transmitting and receiving ends. The fact that it is *possible* or *sufficient* to use multiple antennas to generate and detect OAM (at least approximately) does not mean that it is *necessary*.

    4. MIMO requires massive, time- and energy consuming digital postprocessing, OAM requires almost none digital postprocessing.

    Short summary of angular momentum radio:

    Transferring information wirelessy with electromagnetic (EM) fields amounts to encoding information
    onto physical observables carried by these fields, radiating them into the surrounding space, and
    detecting them remotely by an appropriate sensor connected to an information-decoding receiver. Each
    observable is second order in the fields and fulfills a conservation law. Of all available observables,
    only the linear momentum is fully exploited in present-day radio. A fundamental physical limitation of
    this observable, which represents the translational degrees of freedom of the fields and of the charges
    (typically an oscillating electric current along a linear antenna), is that it is single-mode. This means that
    a linear-momentum radio communication link comprising one transmitting and one receiving antenna,
    known as a single-input-single-output (SISO) link, can provide only one transmission channel per
    frequency (and polarization). In contrast, angular momentum, which represents the rotational degrees
    of freedom, is multi-mode, allowing an angular-momentum SISO link to accommodate an arbitrary
    number of independent transmission channels on one and the same frequency (and polarization).