The figure shown below represents the best measurement of the top quark mass ever obtained by a single experiment, and it is a determination with a less than 1% total uncertainty. It has been approved last week by the CDF experiment at Fermilab.
The CDF experiments collects proton-antiproton collisions delivered by the Tevatron collider, which imparts the projectiles with 1 TeV of energy each, for a center-of-mass energy of 2 TeV. This is still the highest energy ever achieved by a collider, although the record is going to be soon stripped off Fermilab by the Large Hadron Collider, which is due to start colliding protons with other protons at 7 TeV of energy this coming fall.
CDF collected 630 top pair candidates from 4.3 inverse femtobarns of collisions (about 300 trillions of them) in the "single lepton" decay topology: events must have a leptonic W boson decay (or , id est with an energetic electron or muon decay), plus four hadronic jets. The reconstruction fit for the top quark mass uses a matrix element technique which determines both the most likely top quark mass and the offset from a perfect calibration of the jet energy, the so-called "jet energy scale" factor.
Jet energies are the least well determined quantities in the top decay, and an imprecise calibration is the largest source of systematic uncertainty: by fitting for both quantities together the uncertainty in the top quark mass is minimized, through the use of a two-dimensional likelihood function.
The figure shows the two quantities determined together as contours of equal probability. The top mass is measured as (the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the residual one due to the jet energy scale systematics, and the third one is due to other systematical sources of error), or 172.6 +- 1.6 GeV.
This is a less than percent uncertainty, and the best result in the World.
Kudos to my colleagues in CDF for this new stellar result! And kudos to old members of CDF like me, who using merely 7 candidates measured the top mass for the first time back in 1994 as 174 GeV, a measurement which is amazingly still less than one standard deviation away from the most credited numbers!
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- The Real Meaning Of The Blue Black White Gold Dress
- It's Life, Jim, But Not As We Know It
- What Does Your Gut Microbiome Have To Do With Your Immune System?
- Big Data Tackles How Urban Movement Is Linked To Social Activity
- Naming Game Theory Shows How Zealots Sway Popular Opinion
- Adult Stem Cell Transplants Reach 1 Million Worldwide - And Are Still Underused
- Tracking Parasites With Satellites
- "I appreciate that climate scientists are now beginning to recognize an element of natural variation..."
- "Doug:What do you mean by R in your graphs, and the circle with a radius arrow?If, as in the case..."
- "Of course there's one possible explanation for the lack of warming - one that is so obvious, but..."
- "I guess the reason FC persists is that it works! Under appropriate conditions large numbers of..."
- "The researchers conclude that given past historical patterns of variation in the AMO and PMO, this..."
- Robust scientific evidence that chronic fatigue syndrome is a biological illness
- Life 'not as we know it' possible on Saturn's moon Titan?
- For patients with brain tumors, insurance status linked to differences in patient safety and quality of care
- Anti-stroke drugs, minus the side effects
- Local media coverage positive toward local businesses