Better keep that resolution to hit the gym - you don't want to end up like an astronaut. A recent study by Joyce Keyak of UCIrvine suggests that the bones of astronauts lose up to 30% of their hipbone strength, comparable losses caused by osteoporosis in the elderly.
Studies on the weakened bones of astronauts are hardly new-- we've known that prolonged time in zero gravity effects the bones and muscles of astronauts for as long as we've been putting them in orbit. The reason for this is that the cells responsible for bone maintenance are very sensitive to the force signal of our body's response to gravity. Vastly simplified, the bone repairs its structure using two complementary sets of cells. The purpose of the osteoclast is to march around digesting old bone material, leaving a small void in its wake. This gap is then filled by osteoblasts, which build mineral-dense new bone to replace the old.
The everyday processes of living in the earth's gravitational field-- walking, jumping, even sitting-- provide our bones with daily damage in the form of microcracks. In inert materials like ceramics, microcracks are a big problem-- they provide multiple tiny points where stress spikes, leading to large cracks, material degradation, and hastened failure. The human body uses these heightened stress points to signal osteoclasts to flock to the area, resorbing the microcracks and making way for osteoblast remodeling. Thus microdamage is an important part of our self-healing process-their stress buildup signals our osteoclasts that their service is needed.
In zero gravity, astronauts' bones don't experience enough stress to signal for remodeling. This results in a well-documented loss in bone density, but density is a somewhat indirect measure of bone strength. Keyak's work takes a different approach to quantifying bone strength loss. By using QCT scans, she constructed individualized pre- and post-flight finite element models of the femur and hipbones of thirteen astronaut subjects. Each of these astronauts maintained a strict regimen of resistance and cycling exercise on the space station, but Keyak's work suggests that it wasn't enough. Subtle changes in their bone structure reveal that the strength of these bones, loaded in standing position, has decreasesed to osteoporitic values.
Despite the similarities, it's not time to make astronauts the new poster-children for osteoporosis. The bone strength and density losses are comparable, but the causes are different. Osteoporosis on a cellular level involves the deployment of osteoblasts, but an insufficient deployment of osteoclasts. This results in a bone with increased porosity. Astronauts, on the other hand, lose their bone strength the same way that you and I might lose it if we quit our jobs and watched TV all day-disuse. This means that osteoporosis drugs such as biophosphonates, which stave off osteoclast action to maximize bone density retention, are not much help to astronauts.
The solution to less gravity? More gravity. Keyak and other researchers at UC Irvine have developed the Space Cycle, a human-sized centrifuge that looks a lot like something you'd see at an amusement park. The Space Cycle simulates gravitational acceleration by swinging its occupant in a circular path, creating a centrifugal force that is indistinguishable from gravity. This would permit even the occupants of the space station to perform excercises such as squats in earth-like (or greater-than-earthlike) acceleration, activating the bone-remodeling response that we enjoy here on earth.
Keyak JH, et al., Reduction in proximal femoral strength due to long-duration spaceflight. Bone (2009), doi:10.1016/j. bone.2008.11.014
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Suggestion: The EM Drive Is Getting The Appropriate Level Of Attention From The Science Community
- Animal Sex Is Spicier Than We Thought
- Your Fear Of Radiation Is Irrational
- Will Aspartame Critics Now Be Less Bitter?
- Junk Science Report Card
- GMOs Have Formaldehyde? Bizarre Claim Challenged By Experts
- Miscanes: Genetically Modified Sugarcane Can Grow Farther North
- "Great job on this review article on aspartame and other sweeteners. As mentioned, aspartame is..."
- "Your headline is unscientific and your talking points are old, I feel like I've read this piece..."
- "I guess it's time to plan some farewell glacier tour hikes. The ones in Glacier National Park and..."
- "So how much poison did you ingest sitting at your PC copying and pasting all of that stuff? You..."
- "Wow, you just waste my 20 minutes with your conditioned mind full of shitty concepts..Well played..."
- Excessive or inadequate? Confusion about medication is common
- Breast cancer in young women is rarer than media make it seem
- GE crops could save the planet, if Organic advocates let them
- No excuses to be against science now: Monsanto patent expires
- The Pendulum Swings: Prescribing Hormone Replacement Therapy 13 Years After the Women’s Health Initiative Study
- The search for new blood donors ends at the living – but why?
Books By Writers Here