Fake Banner
    Science != Hard?
    By Project Calliope | September 8th 2009 03:01 PM | 4 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Project

    'Project Calliope' is a pico-satellite funded by Science 2.0 and being launched in 2011 by a mad scientist who is a space & music enthusiast...

    View Project's Profile
    I ran into an interesting linguistic stumbling block.  I'll call it the "It's science, so it must be hard" frame of mind.  I wrote to some friends and family about this project, saying:
    I'm launching a satellite for fun, to make music from space.  It's called Project Calliope, and I'm writing about it up at: http://scientificblogging.com/satellite_diaries/feed
     
    It's pretty much just me, with some friends helping with different parts of it, and a couple of sponsors helping cover costs (hopefully). I'll be the first to admit it's unusual, but I've always wanted to be part of the space race.
    And I received one particular reply of:
    Hi-in English what does this actually mean??Sounds, well , different
    In English, what I meant to say is, "I'm launching a satellite for fun, to make music from space..." [etc].  Just as written above.  To me, this is English.

    My thought is many people just have a hard time with scienc-y things.  Once they hear something is science, that equals "hard, eek!" in their minds, and they turn off their usual keen filters (that can follow the plot of '24' across a full season or map the stats of an entire Red Sox season without stress.)

    If I'm at a party and talking about Project Calliope, I don't get the usual "science glaze" that I might when discussing, oh, the solar Colaninno Minima.  Folks get it.  It's like Sputnik, with music.

    However, this is just a theory.  Maybe when I write, it really does sound like technobabble.  But really, what is at all complicated about sampling ionospheric magnetic fields in real time with a MIDI-based sensor array sending HAM signals to downlinks scattered around the rough circle defined by the polar orbit in order to allow sonification of the input data for remixing using synthesizers before an eventual thermal demise due to atmospheric heating?

    Is that so hard to understand?

    To space,

    Alex, the daytime astronomer

    Track The Satellite Diaries via RSS feed and Twitter @skyday

    Comments

    Hank
    I talked to people about it and just said 'music from space' and most got it.  Well, Becky was the only one who didn't understand but I didn't have ...
    sampling ionospheric magnetic fields in real time with a MIDI-based sensor array sending HAM signals to downlinks scattered around the rough circle defined by the polar orbit in order to allow sonification of the input data for remixing using synthesizers before an eventual thermal demise due to atmospheric heating
    ... available so I couldn't quite explain it in a way she would understand better.
    Maktub
    A new dimension to music.... let it live on.
    OK, Alex... here's the main question:

    What sensor data inputs will you map to what MIDI parameters? Have you figured that out yet? Putting some real thought into that is the difference between creating something that is listened to once and then relegated to obscurity versus something that actually charms and delights people.

    Very interested on your thoughts regarding this. I have thoughts as well.

    antunes
    Hi Kevin,

    Excellent points, I'm glad you raised them here.  The quick answer is, I'm working with the sensors manufacturer (Infusion Systems, makers of I-CubeX), hopefully a Berkelee-trained musician, possibly a career science-confiier, also an ionospheric expert in California, and using my own scientific info, to best figure out what inputs to map to create effective music, rather than just noise.  I also plan to build a prototype 'fake ionosphere' and try different configurations.

    The more accurate (yet annoying) answer is, I'm still wrapping up funding issues so I have to wait a couple of weeks before I can get back into the fun stuff of sensor design and really tackle this head on.  It frustrates me to no end.  But as with any project, the funding and management take the bulk of the time.  Fortunately, we're "front end loaded", meaning once funding is secured I can stop the eternal chase for launch support and concentrate on the mission at hand.

    But I completely agree, if we just arbitrarily say "our sensors return MIDI", that's like saying "we produce noise".  There will be much work and fine tuning for this to be effective and meaningful.

    You mention you have thoughts on this.  So now my question to you and any other reader is, do you have a science or music background that can help us in this, and do you want to contribute?  Because, come October, I'll be finally delving deep into the details of sensor design and calibration, and am happy to take input from informed people.

    Email me (satellitediaries at gmail or my personal email) if you want to go into this in depth... but as mentioned, until October I'm still swamped with initial funding stuff.  Ah, reality, how you intrude into dreams.
     
    Cheers,
    Alex

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.