The annual AAAS conference is being held next month in San Diego and I went last year (here and here and here) , despite it being a Chicago February, but most of you did not, thus the reason for the title. Yes, I saw Carl Wieman and Dave Deamer, but that is a pretty small subset given our rather large community, so before I commit to lending the 2010 version my journalistic thews I'd like to know if any of you are going.
Last year was, predictably, global warming, since Al Gore was the keynote speaker, and this year the theme this year is bridging science and society. Sounds familiar, right? Indeed, we do it as well as anyone and certainly better than a peer-review journal but it is good that they are taking notice. The actual events are not going to excite you, though.
How to publish in Science, for example, is not exactly going to appeal to the broad science outreach community, since it is a peer-review journal and expensive for the masses. "Come to us before Nature or PLoS or anyone else" will likely be the theme for that.
Learning science in informal environments is being conducted exclusively by people who are paid to teach science in formal environments. Where is the coffee shop science meeting? Where is the Science of Fine Wines, like we did? Want people to learn science? Bring cheese!
Science as Performance: Communication and Education Using Theater, Music, and Dance is something I will go to just so I have something to write about, should I attend. I know another Understanding Climate-Change Skepticism: Its Sources and Strategies vast right-wing conspiracy lament won't cover any new ground. Here is a strategy; tell people to stop making stuff up, stop circling the wagons when they do, and the data will be convincing on its own.
Exaggerating Denialism: Media Representations of Outlier Views on Climate Change could possibly make that case. In the interests of balance journalists often present opposing views but that does not mean they are equivalent. If it's more of the deficit thinking we see too often in science writers (people are uneducated and we just need to show them we are right) it won't go very far. If it promotes critical thinking - and that would include critical thinking about some of the more exaggerated claims among global warming activists - that would be a great value.
So are you going? If so, drop me a note. I'll bring Bloggy!
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Suggestion: The EM Drive Is Getting The Appropriate Level Of Attention From The Science Community
- Animal Sex Is Spicier Than We Thought
- Your Fear Of Radiation Is Irrational
- Will Aspartame Critics Now Be Less Bitter?
- Junk Science Report Card
- GMOs Have Formaldehyde? Bizarre Claim Challenged By Experts
- Miscanes: Genetically Modified Sugarcane Can Grow Farther North
- "Great job on this review article on aspartame and other sweeteners. As mentioned, aspartame is..."
- "Your headline is unscientific and your talking points are old, I feel like I've read this piece..."
- "I guess it's time to plan some farewell glacier tour hikes. The ones in Glacier National Park and..."
- "So how much poison did you ingest sitting at your PC copying and pasting all of that stuff? You..."
- "Wow, you just waste my 20 minutes with your conditioned mind full of shitty concepts..Well played..."
- Excessive or inadequate? Confusion about medication is common
- Breast cancer in young women is rarer than media make it seem
- GE crops could save the planet, if Organic advocates let them
- No excuses to be against science now: Monsanto patent expires
- The Pendulum Swings: Prescribing Hormone Replacement Therapy 13 Years After the Women’s Health Initiative Study
- The search for new blood donors ends at the living – but why?
Books By Writers Here