Banner
    Mass Squid Death in Tasmania
    By Danna Staaf | February 25th 2011 12:13 PM | 5 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    About Danna

    Cephalopods have been rocking my world since I was in grade school. I pursued them through a BA in marine biology at the University of California...

    View Danna's Profile
    A curious tale! Not least because the writer has no compunctions about referring to squid as fish. While the group "fish" is by no means taxonomically rigorous, and comprises creatures as diverse as hagfish, sharks, and coealacanths, the one thing all fish have in common is that they're vertebrates. Squid are squarely in the invertebrate camp, and therefore excluded from the fish club.

    Linguistic quibbles aside, this really is strange:
    EXPERTS have no answers on what has caused the death of thousands of squid in the River Derwent this week. Dead and dying arrowhead squid have been washed ashore or spotted floating on the water at Austins Ferry and Berriedale since Tuesday.
    Arrowhead or arrow squid, also called (by those in the Linnean know) Nototodarus gouldi, are abundant all around the south of Australia, including Tasmania. But, like all other cephalopods, they are solely saltwater animals. So the fact that they were found dead in a river at first seemed like a no-brainer to me: Duh, rivers are freshwater, squid can't surivive that.

    But then I checked on the Derwent River, and learned that in the area around Hobart, where the squid were found, it's actually an estuary, and probably quite salty. So what went wrong? The EPA director said:
    "It is possible that these fish [sic] have been caught in low-salinity water following the high stormwater discharges over the weekend."
    That seems pretty straightforward. But then the people who've lived in the area forever claim they've never seen anything like it before (and there have likely been plenty of storms before). So is the mass squid mortality a sign of the end times?

    Probably not. Psychology says that we humans are fabulously good at forgetting, and forgetting that we've forgotten, so it's quite possible that those people have seen something like it before. Or maybe they haven't seen it, but it has happened, and they didn't notice it because there was something else in the news that day, or they were busy celebrating a birthday, or what have you.

    It was probably just a lot of unlucky squid that happened to be in the harbor when a surge of freshwater poured in.

    Comments

    Fossil Huntress
    Squid in Tasmania after earthquakes rock that part of the world. Next week they'll get locusts. Then four men on horseback will arrive. I only read the previews but I think the whole thing ends poorly.
    Danna Staaf
    Oh man, I can't believe I missed the earthquake connection. It's an Antipodean Armageddon.
    Somehow I would have expected the EPA director, if not the journalist, to know that squid are not fish.

    Danna Staaf
    You would think.
    Although I suppose it's always possible that the journalist misquoted him.

    Add a comment

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
    • Allowed HTML tags: <sup> <sub> <a> <em> <strong> <center> <cite><TH><ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br> <p> <blockquote> <strike> <object> <param> <embed> <del> <pre> <b> <i> <table> <tbody> <div> <tr> <td> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr> <iframe><u><font>
    • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
    CAPTCHA
    If you register, you will never be bothered to prove you are human again. And you get a real editor toolbar to use instead of this HTML thing that wards off spam bots.