Fundamental Quantum Uncertainty And Stingy Guitar Tuning

There is a very simple high school homework exercise question that I have kept with me for 30 or...

Yes! To Hell With Out Of Africa

Ah, life is good lately; can’t stop winning. Almost never recommend anybody, ‘cuz humans disappoint...

New Heights In Systemic Corrupt Science: Another Hockey Stick; Would You Fund For Retracting?

Well known: Critical science is career suicide. But did you know you are not even allowed to warn...

No Science Distorting Populism For High Trust Society

The prospect of a peaceful right wing revolution from the heart is no more but an April fools’...

User picture.
picture for David Hallidaypicture for Tommaso Dorigopicture for David LePoirepicture for Robert H Olleypicture for Ladislav Kocbachpicture for Samuel Kenyon
Sascha VongehrRSS Feed of this column.

Dr. Sascha Vongehr [风洒沙], physicist and philosopher, studied phil/math/chem/phys in Germany, obtained a BSc in theoretical physics (electro-mag) & MSc (stringtheory) at Sussex University... Read More »

Usually the arXiv does time wasting nasty things like delay and then re-categorize articles with inconvenient truths into unsuitable categories where nobody of the target audience will find it and the usual audience is not interested. This however is 2016, the year where the liberal denial of reality has accumulated so much suffering, for example to the Black community, women, the Middle East ..., that people can no longer stand it.

Everybody, males, females, Whites, non-Whites, ... is nowadays personally harmed by the established anti-scientific ideology of denying the differences between humans and our evolutionary constraints. A positive feedback loop after a certain threshold has now been reached:

Zen cooking according to the teachings of the master-less monk Feng Sa Sha (风洒沙, Wind Sprinkling Sand) is, unsurprising perhaps when considering the radical fundamentality of Zen, not only the most inexpensive and easy as well as perhaps most importantly, great tasting of all cooking, but moreover it is the most healthy and wholesome diet – no surprise that it is consistent with and full of good science.


This is the reply after asking a scientist to endorse putting a draft of an article into a more fitting category on the arXiv, which is a mere preprint archive (not a journal or anything like that) where I already put almost 20 articles, and the endorsement would be anonymous, so this established scientist fears that the enforcers at the PC arXiv may notify his or her University - this is the state of free speech today, the reality of the scientific community:

Hi Sascha,
After more research into the roots as well as the current realities of certain issues, I have removed some articles and revised many (as I usually do, but even more). The US does not have a prison or gun problem; it has a problem with certain races. Since separation (segregation) is no longer possible, the US is forced to build more incarceration facilities. It also needs far more holders of concealed weapons - that such is not necessary in certain other places is no argument against such but rather strengthens the case for that it is necessary, and it becomes so all over the decaying West now.
We already must deal with computers too much rather than too little, and there is already lots of advanced computing done also for example in materials science and nanotechnology, for example molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo simulations.[2] The molecular biologist’s programs for predicting protein folding can also count as nanotechnology. Nevertheless, all of our previous articles* concluded that we need more computing, and several mentioned statistics. This would sound predictable if coming from a statistical physicist with a background in computing, advertising his skills. However, we mean a more efficient computing rather than simply more.
The (Pre-)Neanderthals were the first, you see: