Biodiversity Informatics: the emergence of a field Indra Neil Sarkar1,2,3 1 Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA 2 Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, VT, USA 3 Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering and Mathematical Science, University of Vermont, VT, USA author email corresponding author email BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 14):S1doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-S14-S1 The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/S14/S1 Published: 10 November 2009 © 2009 Sarkar; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Introduction Recent years have seen great technological advances that have helped usher in a new generation of approaches to understand and share knowledge about the planet in which we live. A number of major initiatives that aim to catalyze necessary technological and biological advances synergistically have emerged globally. Of these enabling initiatives, the Encyclopedia of Life (EOL; http://www.eol.org webcite) and the Barcode of Life (BOL; http://barcoding.si.edu webcite) are projects that have collectively help lay a framework within which we will see the next generation of taxonomic innovation and discovery. The successes of both EOL and BOL have the potential to impact multiple facets of society - from the discovery of new species, to the development of conservation strategies for endangered life, to insights into infectious disease hosts and vectors, to the discovery of life-saving medicinal plants, to the piquing of general interest about life on Earth and our role in the complex web of life. Both the EOL and BOL initiatives are possible thanks to a number of significant advancements in knowledge discovery, integration, and management techniques. Collectively termed 'biodiversity informatics,' this new suite of methodologies and tools extends contemporary computer science and informatics principles within the context of biodiversity data. This supplement, made possible through funding from both EOL and BOL, brings forth some of the pioneering work from leading biodiversity informatics researchers. While nascent as a discipline, biodiversity informatics has proven to not only adopt, but also help significantly challenge and advance the most recent technological advances and computational approaches for managing complex data. In contrast to bioinformatics, which in primarily focused on managing relevant molecular biology data, biodiversity informatics requires frameworks and approaches that can accommodate the full range of biological information - from molecules to morphological features, to populations, to habitats - collectively developing the ultimate computational Web of knowledge about life on Earth. This supplement starts with a piece from Chavan and Ingwersen that goes through some of the fundamental principles for disseminating biodiversity information, discussing both the hindrances and opportunities . Hill et al. then describe how one might leverage existing technological infrastructure for enabling georeferencing of biodiversity data . Demonstrating how biodiversity informatics can often benefit from the latest advances in searching strategies, Hajibabaei and Singer describe an approach for making use of Google to identify relevant information with respect to DNA sequences . Next, Page discusses the nuances of biological global unique identifiers, which may be necessary to link relevant biodiversity data across various spheres of knowledge . In consideration of the necessary continual curation required for disparate biodiversity knowledge, Smith et al. describe a Drupal-based technology called "Scratchpads" for managing and sharing biodiversity knowledge . In parallel to the emerging infrastructure for managing and disseminating biodiversity information, DNA Barcode analysis methods represent a crucial entry point into the realm of biodiversity knowledge. The last four articles thus focus on some recent advances in DNA Barcoding analytic approaches. The first of these articles, from Bertolazzi et al., presents a machine learning approach for classifying species according to DNA Barcode derived information . Chu et al. then describe a 'composition vector' approach for making use of large datasets of DNA Barcodes for classification . In light of molecular sequence alignment as an often rate-limiting step in many classification approaches, Kuksa and Pavlovic present an alignment-free approach for DNA Barcode data . In light of the range of approaches associated with DNA Barcode based classification, Austerlitz et al. present an overview of common phylogenetic and statistical methods most commonly considered . A unifying theme in the articles of this supplement is the diversity of issues that remain to be resolved going forward. It is my hope that this issue helps continue and inspire new dialogue across the full range of disciplines associated with this burgeoning field. Competing interests The author declares that he has no competing interests. Acknowledgements I am extremely grateful to the generosity of both the Encyclopedia of Life (EOL) and Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) leadership for their sponsorship to make this issue possible. Dr. James L Edwards (EOL), Dr. David Schindel (CBOL) and their staff helped ensure that the entire process from conception to fruition happened without any issues. Key members of the BioMed Central team (Jo Baker, Nadine McKoy, and Isobel Peters) were also instrumental throughout the process. Finally, my sincerest thanks goes to the contributors and the numerous reviewers who helped make difficult choices in selecting the manuscripts for publication in this supplement. This article has been published as part of BMC Bioinformatics Volume 10 Supplement 14, 2009: Biodiversity Informatics. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10?issue=S14. References 1.Chavan VS, Ingwersen P: Towards a Data Publishing Framework for Primary Biodiversity Data: Challenges and Potentials. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 14):S2. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text Return to text 2.Hill AW, Guralnick R, Flemons P, Beaman R, Wieczorek J, Ranipeta A, Chavan V, Remsen D: Location, Location, Location: Utilizing pipelines and services to more effectively georeference the world's biodiversity data. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 14):S3. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text Return to text 3.Hajibabaei M, Singer GAC: Googling DNA Sequences on the World Wide Web. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 14):S4. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text Return to text 4.Page RDM: BioGUID: resolving, discovering, and minting identifiers for biodiversity informatics. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 14):S5. BioMed Central Full Text Return to text 5.Smith VS, Rycroft SD, Harmen KT, Scott B, Roberts D: Scratchpads: a data-publishing framework to build, share and manage information on the diversity of life. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 14):S6. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text Return to text 6.Bertolazzi P, Felici G, Weitschek E: Learning to Classify Species with Barcodes. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 14):S7. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text Return to text 7.Chu KH, Xu M, Li CP: Rapid DNA Barcoding Analysis of Large Datasets Using CV Method. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 14):S8. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text Return to text 8.Kuksa P, Pavlovic V: Efficient Alignment-free DNA Barcode Analytics. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 14):S9. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text Return to text 9.Austerlitz F, David O, Schaeffer B, Bleakley K, Olteanu M, Leblois R, Veuille M, Laredo C: DNA barcode analysis: a comparison of phylogenetic and statistical classification methods. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 14):S10. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text Return to text
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- Reassuring SUSY Seekers
- Science 2.0: Network Modeling To Seek Out Misinformation Diffusion
- The Great War Began 100 Years Ago Today: Here's History That Gets Ignored
- Anxiety Linked To Seizures Mistaken For Epilepsy
- "Extraordinary Claims, The 0.000029% Solution" And The 38 MeV Boson AT ICNFP 2014
- Pushing More Math, Science Linked To More High School Dropouts Among Minorities
- IRC 0218 9.6 Billion Years Ago Is Farthest Lensing Galaxy Yet
- "Ah sorry, re-reading the last sentence of the post I see that the explanation was as explicit as..."
- "Sick article. Biased...."
- "That's the same as saying guns don't kill people, it's gun policies, and there is a difference..."
- " Bear-- I must admit philosophy is not my strong point. I am much more suited to science. I was..."
- "There's nothing complicated about it. Surely you can distinguish between a program and the implementation..."
- Doctor of Grace - A Critical Reappraisal of Augustine
- Clues to curbing obesity found in neuronal 'sweet spot'
- Pepper and halt: Spicy chemical may inhibit gut tumors
- Study reveals one reason brain tumors are more common in men
- Understanding how neurons regulate metabolism in response to a high-fat diet