Yesterday CMS published the results of a new search for a heavy partner of the bottom quark, by looking for the decay b' -> bZ: that is, the heavy b' is sought in a so-called Flavour-Changing neutral current process. The "neutral current" is an old but still used terminology to indicate the emission of a neutral vector boson, the Z.
Neutral currents, unlike charged currents (W emission) cannot change the flavour of a quark in the Standard Model. However, if we consider new quarks with vector-like properties (a way of saying that the quark couples symmetrically to vector bosons regardless of its helicity), that decay mode is possible, and may even be dominant as the mass of the heavy quark is large.
So far a heavy b' quark had been sought by CDF (268), CMS (550), and ATLAS (645-720), where the number in parenthesis indicates the lower limit on the mass of the quark set by the corresponding search, in GeV. The ATLAS numbers are two because they considered two possible schemes for the fourth generation of quarks, a singlet and doublet scenario.
I should now explain that in all these searches for heavy particles the way one sets a lower limit on the mass is by first determining an upper limit on the number of such particles produced in a given amount of collisions, and then comparing that experimental limit with the number calculated by theorists of particles that would have been produced as a function of the particle mass: since lower masses almost invariably imply higher production rates, the upper limit on the production rate becomes a lower limit on the mass. The reasoning is thus "if these things were lighter than x, there would be more than y of them in my data; but I know there are fewer than that (otherwise I would have detected a signal!!), so they must have mass M>x to exist".
These searches all assumed, for simplicity, a 100% branching fraction of the b' to bZ final states; of course if the branching fraction of the decay is smaller the limit on the production rate worsens, and hence also the mass becomes less constrained.
CMS sought for b'->bZ events in 2012 data (19.6 inverse
femtobarns of 8-TeV collisions) by looking for reconstructed Z->ee
and Z->μμ decays accompanied by a b-tagged hadronic jet (from the
energetic b quark emitted in the decay). The combined mass of the bZ
system can then be fit by a background model and a hypothetical
contribution from the b' signal, as shown below (the signal is shown as a dashed histogram for a mass of 700 GeV).
On the left is the subset of events where the Z is observed to decay in electron-positron pairs, on the right the corresponding data for Z->μμ decays. The shaded bands indicate the total background prediction, and the lower insets in the graphs show the difference between data and background in units of the total uncertainty.
Since the b' quark is assumed to be produced in pairs, there are in principle two b' quarks in the final state. The search is however inclusive, in the sense that one single b' is sought. The other may decay to the same final state, or to tW pairs. CMS set very loose requirements on the additional objects in the final state, such that one does not need to assume a 100% branching fraction to bZ a priori. All that CMS assumes is that the sum of branching fractions to bZ and tW is unity.
The CMS lower mass limit at 95% confidence level, assuming a 100% FCNC branching fraction b'->bZ, is at 700 GeV. CMS also produced a mass limit as a function of the branching fraction. It is shown below: as you see, as the supposed branching fraction becomes small, the mass limit loosens considerably.
As usual, the full black curve indicates the observed limit, and the dashed one (with accompanying "brazil band") shows the expected one.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- A Dimuon Particle At 30 GeV In ALEPH ??
- Journalists Be Aware - Your Unverified "Doomsday" News Terrifies Children And Vulnerable People
- President Obama, Why Humans On Mars Right Now Are Bad For Science
- DDoS war: How zombie fridges bit the internet in the ass today.
- EPA Again Delays Report On Safety Of Glyphosate
- Biofuels Are A Climate Mistake
- Plastic: There's Value In Marine Waste
- "NIBIRU HERE NIBIRU THERE NIBIRU BEING SPOTTED EVERYWHERE now tell me im wrong in fact i will go..."
- "Ok so what about the JESSE VENTURE person you ever heard of him like i said its called conspiracy..."
- "Hallelujah, HEP is saved!..."
- "Yes, some of them Nancy Lieder doesn't have a clue about astronomy, she claims the most absurd..."
- "Any of these names mean anything to you Zechariah stitchin,nancy lieder,gill boussard,steve olsen..."
- Placebo: Bubbles Of Nothing Are Still Not Something
- People Who Take Drugs May Be Likelier to Commit Suicide
- Improved 'Screen Time' Guidelines Could Make Parents & Kids Happier
- Dr. Jamie Wells Named One Of America's Top Pediatricians
- Why Did EPA Delay Its Glyphosate Safety Report?
- Scientists Should Fight Postmodern Public Values