Yesterday CMS published the results of a new search for a heavy partner of the bottom quark, by looking for the decay b' -> bZ: that is, the heavy b' is sought in a so-called Flavour-Changing neutral current process. The "neutral current" is an old but still used terminology to indicate the emission of a neutral vector boson, the Z.
Neutral currents, unlike charged currents (W emission) cannot change the flavour of a quark in the Standard Model. However, if we consider new quarks with vector-like properties (a way of saying that the quark couples symmetrically to vector bosons regardless of its helicity), that decay mode is possible, and may even be dominant as the mass of the heavy quark is large.
So far a heavy b' quark had been sought by CDF (268), CMS (550), and ATLAS (645-720), where the number in parenthesis indicates the lower limit on the mass of the quark set by the corresponding search, in GeV. The ATLAS numbers are two because they considered two possible schemes for the fourth generation of quarks, a singlet and doublet scenario.
I should now explain that in all these searches for heavy particles the way one sets a lower limit on the mass is by first determining an upper limit on the number of such particles produced in a given amount of collisions, and then comparing that experimental limit with the number calculated by theorists of particles that would have been produced as a function of the particle mass: since lower masses almost invariably imply higher production rates, the upper limit on the production rate becomes a lower limit on the mass. The reasoning is thus "if these things were lighter than x, there would be more than y of them in my data; but I know there are fewer than that (otherwise I would have detected a signal!!), so they must have mass M>x to exist".
These searches all assumed, for simplicity, a 100% branching fraction of the b' to bZ final states; of course if the branching fraction of the decay is smaller the limit on the production rate worsens, and hence also the mass becomes less constrained.
CMS sought for b'->bZ events in 2012 data (19.6 inverse
femtobarns of 8-TeV collisions) by looking for reconstructed Z->ee
and Z->μμ decays accompanied by a b-tagged hadronic jet (from the
energetic b quark emitted in the decay). The combined mass of the bZ
system can then be fit by a background model and a hypothetical
contribution from the b' signal, as shown below (the signal is shown as a dashed histogram for a mass of 700 GeV).
On the left is the subset of events where the Z is observed to decay in electron-positron pairs, on the right the corresponding data for Z->μμ decays. The shaded bands indicate the total background prediction, and the lower insets in the graphs show the difference between data and background in units of the total uncertainty.
Since the b' quark is assumed to be produced in pairs, there are in principle two b' quarks in the final state. The search is however inclusive, in the sense that one single b' is sought. The other may decay to the same final state, or to tW pairs. CMS set very loose requirements on the additional objects in the final state, such that one does not need to assume a 100% branching fraction to bZ a priori. All that CMS assumes is that the sum of branching fractions to bZ and tW is unity.
The CMS lower mass limit at 95% confidence level, assuming a 100% FCNC branching fraction b'->bZ, is at 700 GeV. CMS also produced a mass limit as a function of the branching fraction. It is shown below: as you see, as the supposed branching fraction becomes small, the mass limit loosens considerably.
As usual, the full black curve indicates the observed limit, and the dashed one (with accompanying "brazil band") shows the expected one.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- The Five Stages Of A Dying Theory
- Something is wrong in the Arctic
- Is The X(5568) A True Resonance ?
- Order Patterned With Chaos - How Climate Is Predicted For Decades - With Exact Forecasts Only For Days
- Neanderthals: Not So Dumb
- Anomaly! Book Presentation At CERN On November 29
- Should Pregnant Women Be Concerned About BPA?
- "Oh okay maybe they got upset in the same way you did. You could try pointing them towards my Nibiru..."
- "So you can guarantee to me that this is not real yeah thats all i want for this not to be real..."
- "No you don't. It's not real, it's a hoax, any astronomer would just LOL at the idea. These are..."
- "Do I need to do any of that then Mr walker just want the truth are me and my children in any danger..."
- "Oh, don't do any of that. Who has told you to do that? Are they people you would trust with your..."
- Public Citizen Wants You Dead- Not Bacteria
- Pfizer's Centrum Silver Multivitamins Contain Pesticide, Paint, and Glass
- Fly me to the Moon, but hold the altitude sickness
- What's in an Egg? Demystifying the Labels
- Paper Scandal at Science? Microbeads Lying In the Weeds. With A Stolen Computer.
- Honey, Please Pass The High Fructose Corn Syrup