Banner
    Curiosity lands safely! On a scale from 1 to 17 it was a perfect 20.
    By Hontas Farmer | August 6th 2012 12:48 AM | 3 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments
    The Curiosity rover has landed safely on MARS, we have seen the image of the wheel on the surface.    There were good reasons to doubt the "Sky crane" approach to a landing.  Just one computer glitch, just one wrong calculation, just one strange interaction of various systems and the story would be different.  


    The difficulty of this has been compared in recent days to "sticking the dismount" in gymnastics.  This is that times a million.  It's like making a robot that can do the routine and land on it's feet, based only on its AI, while falling from space! It was a perfect 20*. 

    NASA was slated for serious budget cuts in the coming years.  Hopefully this will have ensured more generous funding for them, and for other big science projects in the United States of America, and the world.  Perhaps the team that discovered the Higgs Boson should have a bit of competition for the Nobel?  This is that big of an achievement. 
     
    Congratulations to everyone involved.   


    *Before anyone asks, international gymnastics does not use the scale from 1-10 anymore.

    Comments

    rholley
    Like the Spinal Tap volume control, which goes to 11.
     
    Robert H. Olley Quondam Physics Department University of Reading England
    Hfarmer
    Yeah.  The sport of gymnastics gained a system which creates a significant difference between the winner and 2nd place...but lost the easiest to understand system.  
    I noticed several routines which according to the scores shown on NBC had no execution deductions.  The execution score is out of 10 so it lives on in a diminished form.  It's still not as electric as the build up to a 10 was.   Seeing the scores creep up.  Then the last competitor or two needs that 10 to overtake, when they get it, it was like being hit by lighting! 

    However the concept was flawed.  This beautiful routine from Nadia Comaneci. 



    That would not have been a 10 in more recent times (not to mention impossible due to equipment changes) . 

    Perfect is perfect how can it become not perfect because of some changes to a code of points?  it had to go. 
    Science advances as much by mistakes as by plans.
    BDOA
    Cheers go to NASA for a safe touchdown.
    BDOA Adams, Axitronics