George Clooney used to copy my haircuts.
People who knew me in the 1990s always marveled at my classic, parted-on-the-side, immaculately coiffed style. It was retro, just like the term "marvelous' is today. Prior to that, I had a classic Caesar no-part look. He showed up in the television show "E.R." sporting that and I dismissed it as coincidence but when he then jumped onto my "Mad Men without the goop" look, I became suspicious and switched again, to a slicked-back "1980s martial arts villain" look, before changing to what I have now; a random part, more California, less Northeast serious. When you are young, it is a struggle to be taken seriously in the physics and engineering world but I am older now, so it's all cowboy boots and casual.
He became a giant star with that look so he is stuck with it now. My hair is safe. My language, not so much.
I've been forced to reinvent my catchphrases due to pop culture glomming onto those also. 20 years ago, "awesome" was my emotive of choice. It was bombastic, it was exaggerated, it was hilarious - there is nothing awesome about getting a band-aid in your breakfast at King's in Monroeville, that is why using the term made my kids laugh when it happened.
"Marvelous", on the other hand, was the wrong kind of humor then. Billy Crystal knew it was funny and kitschy for his character Fernando to use "marvelous" for everything on "Saturday Night Live" in the 1980s, so it was the wrong sort of cliché in the United States by then. Not so in Britain. A recent linguistics analysis found that in the 1990s "marvelous" was used 155 times per million 20 words - that is down to 2 times per million now. It's been replaced by "awesome", which sits at 72 times per million words.
Billy Crystal as "Fernando" on Saturday Night Live. Credit: NBC
That means I can no longer use it.
In hindsight, I should have seen this coming when the character "Barney" on the television show "How I Met Your Mother" practically made "awesome" his trademark. At first it made me laugh, since I used it a lot. I then flirted briefly with rejuvenating "totally" but I wanted to see how the 'awesome' thing played played out.
What happened in the UK, that marvelous was the default choice for understated British humor and yet is now a relic? Professor Tony McEnery of Lancaster University says British culture is now George Clooney-ing America when it comes to language. A team from Lancaster and Cambridge has created Spoken British National Corpus 2014, which wants to track the changes in common language over time. And those are the results so far. It is an ill omen.
Imagine if an entire island copied my haircut. It would definitely have to go. So rest in peace "awesome", I am "marvelous" now.
What will I do if George Clooney brings "marvelous" back in style?
I don't know, it will be a totes awky mo mo, though.
Note: Want to send .mp3 recordings of how you talk to the project for posterity? Email the file email@example.com.
- PHYSICAL SCIENCES
- EARTH SCIENCES
- LIFE SCIENCES
- SOCIAL SCIENCES
Subscribe to the newsletter
Stay in touch with the scientific world!
Know Science And Want To Write?
- "It is no longer necessary to read articles with anything near belief of credibility when thire..."
- "Hi Robert,so you play the piano too!I have started to take piano lessons recently as I would like..."
- "This is somewhat bizarre. The paper itself says:There seems to be not just one, but several..."
- "Cool. We're going to start holding doctors accountable for feigned authority and chasing dollars..."
- "Wonderful Offenbach! I remember that particular tune from my schooldays. This performance..."
Books By Writers Here