Fake Banner
Chloe Kim And Eileen Gu In Media As Anti-Asian Narrative

Olympians Chloe Kim and Eileen Gu are both Americans but have Asian descent. Yet Kim competed for...

Misandry Vs Manosphere: Both Use Unscientific Woo To Advance Their Beliefs But One Sells Better

Culture wars are as eternal as shooting wars, and that means there will always be war profiteers...

RIP To Dr. William Foege, The Man Whose Math Eliminated Smallpox

In the modern world, it is easy to be newly concerned about the World Health Organisation. They...

Scholars Who Got Sold On The Academic Life Feel The Pressure

Professor Peter Mitchell got a Nobel Prize in 1978 for a chemiosmotic hypothesis of how ATP is...

User picture.
picture for Hontas Farmerpicture for Fred Phillipspicture for Tommaso Dorigopicture for Atreyee Bhattacharyapicture for picture for Patrick Lockerby
Hank CampbellRSS Feed of this column.

I founded Science 2.0® in 2006 and since then it has become the world's largest independent science communications site, with over 300,000,000 direct readers and reach approaching one billion. Read More »

Blogroll

Loneliness is commonly regarded as a social phenomenon in which individual personality differences contribute to its severity. Some people enjoy solitude, for example, because they never feel lonely, while people with high degrees of loneliness have shorter life expectancies than people who never feel lonely.

There may be more to it than that. Recent research shows that the gene expression in the immune cells of people with chronically high levels of loneliness is different than people who do not feel lonely. Even more telling, some genes were underexpressed in the same subjects, including those in antibody production.

We syndicate some of our articles through Blogburst and we were #64 overall last quarter and highest among science sites, so readers at Reuters, USA Today, etc. like us.
I discovered a site called Megite today that has 1 article from physorg.com, 1 from something called rebelscience.blogspot.com, 1 from Washingtonpost.com and a few others - and none from us. Ever. A site that wants to be go-to for news that doesn't have a top 20 science site or even one of our 7,000 articles needs some help, so I am linking to him. EDIT: February 29th, 2008. I pulled the link back off. If he hasn't bothered to find us by now, the guy is too incompetent to deserve the linkboost we give him.
Study Shows over 68% of Science Stories Have Scientific Errors How accurate is that article? I have no idea, but I am willing to believe it just like most people are willing to believe science journalism. I don't mind honest errors, it's intentionally advocacy and spin that concerns me.
I got spammed with a 'carnival' that looks suspiciously like another self-promotion effort, namely because it's chock full of the usual suspects and a few token outside pieces from people no one anyone has ever heard of - but you can check it out for yourself: Natural sciences carnival.

When people in a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill study were told that anorexia nervosa had a biological or genetics-based cause they were less likely to put any personal accountability on anorexics than when they were told it was personal or cultural.

That makes sense. A disease that is egalitarian and exculpatory like a genetics or biological mutation is different than a syndrome. We can't blame kids with Autism for having Autism, though we do teach them to moderate their behavior - and that's a key point.

Anorexia nervosa is characterized by an obsessive desire to be thin and results in self-starvation and related medical complications.