Fake Banner
Why Raw Dairy Farms In California Accelerated The H5N1 Bird Flu Pandemic

Californis is the largest dairy producer in the United States. It is also the most anti-science...

Affirmative Action In NIH Grants Revealed

The Supreme Court recently issued another ruling that seeks to end racial discrimination. most...

Environmentalists, What Are You Asking From Dedmoroz Lenin For Earth Day This Year?

Tomorrow is Earth Day. It is also Lenin's birthday. That's not coincidence. The leader of...

How Ancel Keys Went From MAHA Hero To MAHA Villain

If a lot of the food and health claims you read and hear today seem like things left over from...

User picture.
picture for Tommaso Dorigopicture for Heidi Hendersonpicture for Fred Phillipspicture for picture for Hontas Farmerpicture for Atreyee Bhattacharya
Hank CampbellRSS Feed of this column.

I founded Science 2.0® in 2006 and since then it has become the world's largest independent science communications site, with over 300,000,000 direct readers and reach approaching one billion. Read More »

Blogroll
We syndicate some of our articles through Blogburst and we were #64 overall last quarter and highest among science sites, so readers at Reuters, USA Today, etc. like us.
I discovered a site called Megite today that has 1 article from physorg.com, 1 from something called rebelscience.blogspot.com, 1 from Washingtonpost.com and a few others - and none from us. Ever. A site that wants to be go-to for news that doesn't have a top 20 science site or even one of our 7,000 articles needs some help, so I am linking to him. EDIT: February 29th, 2008. I pulled the link back off. If he hasn't bothered to find us by now, the guy is too incompetent to deserve the linkboost we give him.
Study Shows over 68% of Science Stories Have Scientific Errors How accurate is that article? I have no idea, but I am willing to believe it just like most people are willing to believe science journalism. I don't mind honest errors, it's intentionally advocacy and spin that concerns me.
I got spammed with a 'carnival' that looks suspiciously like another self-promotion effort, namely because it's chock full of the usual suspects and a few token outside pieces from people no one anyone has ever heard of - but you can check it out for yourself: Natural sciences carnival.

When people in a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill study were told that anorexia nervosa had a biological or genetics-based cause they were less likely to put any personal accountability on anorexics than when they were told it was personal or cultural.

That makes sense. A disease that is egalitarian and exculpatory like a genetics or biological mutation is different than a syndrome. We can't blame kids with Autism for having Autism, though we do teach them to moderate their behavior - and that's a key point.

Anorexia nervosa is characterized by an obsessive desire to be thin and results in self-starvation and related medical complications.

There's a site called the blog readability test. It basically tells you what level of education you need to read a site and generally, it claims, how smart your readers are. This is the bad news for us: