Banner
Enough: Toward A Sustainable Economics

We're no longer surprised that so many people bow down to the Invisible Hand...

COP Meetings – 27 Of ‘em! – With Still No.…

And back at home, Congressman John Curtis (R Utah) tells National Public Radio that the “conservative...

Culture Wars

Count the times the word “culture” came out of reporters’ mouths last week, and you’d think...

Want To Buy A Tech Company?

If you’ve drunk the MBA kool-aid, you believe VCs and M&A bean-counters rationally price their...

User picture.
picture for Hank Campbellpicture for Hontas Farmerpicture for Wes Sturdevantpicture for Helen Barrattpicture for Steve Donaldsonpicture for Patrick Lockerby
Fred PhillipsRSS Feed of this column.

After a dozen years as a market research executive, Fred Phillips was professor, dean, and vice provost at a variety of universities in the US, Europe, and South America. He is now Visiting Professor... Read More »

Blogroll

American business schools, R.I.P.

It’s curious, all the press attention lavished on this recent article1 in Jour. Evolutionary Biology.

Noting the differing proportions of human hands versus those of other primates, Michael Morgan and David Carrier of the University of Utah concluded human hands are better suited for making fists. They wondered whether this confers an evolutionary advantage.

Guns

Guns

Feb 11 2013 | comment(s)

I’m going to go out on a limb, and write about guns. Specifically, handguns and so-called “assault weapons.”

I’m not going to opine about what the law should or shouldn’t be, but only about the personal advisability of owning these kinds of firearms.

Likewise I make no comment about shotguns and single-action rifles. If you enjoy owning them for skeet or target shooting, I’ve got no argument with you, and in fact I agree those activities are kind of fun. If you like them for dove or deer, more power to you, even though I don’t share your passion for hunting.

Pistols

Three reasons why government can look less efficient than it really is:

1. Cherry-picking in privatization. Let’s suppose we could rank government agencies or services in descending order of productivity: 1, 2, 3, and so on, with agency 1 being the most efficient and productive. As a reality check, let’s note that such a ranking is indeed possible, in a rough way.


1. Thou shalt not
screw thine early adopters. They made thou what thou art, even showing patience with thine inattention to upward compatibility. Yea, though they paid high early prices, thou hast refused them free upgrades. Now as they glance at their boxes of obsolete connectors, power sources, software and disk drives, they plan to make their next purchases from thine upstart competitor.
Prior to World War II and dating back to the 1890s, the phrases “social technology” and “social engineering” carried strong connotations of central planning. This became particularly true in the Soviet Union, where the terms appeared in various tracts.